by Meldaria » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:42 pm
by Shanti Nilaya » Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:06 am
Decay is inherent in all existing things. All things, including the Worlds, must come to an end. Suffering arises from thininkg we can save the Earth. It, too, must come into oblivion. Let go of fear, and suffering shall end.
by Grays Harbor » Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:52 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:53 am
by Burninati0n » Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:56 am
Grays Harbor wrote:We cannot support any proposal which has at least half of its text as "political goals".
by Bears Armed » Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:59 am
by A mean old man » Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:11 am
Charlotte Ryberg wrote:I'm not sure if 2020 counts as game mechanics since all members immediately come into compliance.
by James Bluntus » Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:55 am
1. Reduce the worlds CO2 emissions by 20 percent before the year 2020.
2. Increase the green and clean energy industry in every nation with a population larger than 10 billion.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:28 pm
by Rutianas » Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:39 pm
by Grays Harbor » Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:16 pm
Rutianas wrote:Oh, good. We're currently in the year 2386 and under 10 billion population. I guess this doesn't apply to us then. We kind of passed one mark already, and haven't reached the second. Also, why should we reduce our CO2 emissions by 20 percent? The plants kind of need that to survive.
In point 4, exactly why should rich nations have to help poorer ones? This isn't exactly the World Charity Assembly, you know.
We're definitely opposed.
Paula Jenner, Rutianas Ambassador
by Bazatia » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:30 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Rutianas wrote:Oh, good. We're currently in the year 2386 and under 10 billion population. I guess this doesn't apply to us then. We kind of passed one mark already, and haven't reached the second. Also, why should we reduce our CO2 emissions by 20 percent? The plants kind of need that to survive.
In point 4, exactly why should rich nations have to help poorer ones? This isn't exactly the World Charity Assembly, you know.
We're definitely opposed.
Paula Jenner, Rutianas Ambassador
Its sounds like an attempt at social engineering and the pushing of the proposers own socialist agenda, at least to us.
Tsaraine wrote:Somewhere in Philadelphia, one school administrator has just smacked another school administrator upside the head. "Damnit, Jenkins! I told you we should just have gone with chastity belts!"
by Freeoplis » Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:35 pm
by Arkinesia » Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:31 pm
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Philimbesi » Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:22 am
Note that all the political goals are not binding as such, but should be interpreted as an initiative all governments should take.
by Esperantujo 2 » Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:33 pm
by Jeffro Topia » Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:20 pm
by James Bluntus » Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:00 pm
by The Palentine » Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:11 am
by Arkinesia » Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:57 am
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: The Grand Republic Of Siepressia, The Ice States
Advertisement