Gun Control Test

[Suckeryou]

Gun Obtaining Process
Gun Control- Tighten

Recognizing the fact that guns endanger the life of most if not all people.
Therefore by the power of the World Assembly all peoples wishing to own a gun must:
1. Solicit a fire arm from your countries minister of public safety.
2. Once received the letter of approval from minister, you must present this letter to gun shop and request model and type.
3. Before accepting gun must wait three-weeks during which citizen will take mental sanity test and receive certificate of sanity from county judge.
4. Once all steps are completed, citizen must show both certificate of mental sanity and approval from minister of public safety to receive ordered gun.
Only by following each step in said order, will a firearm be obtained legally.
By tightening gun regulation, crime rates would go down and because of the process stated here, guns will be harder to obtain. Therefore making the world safer and morally correct.

PLEASE CORRECT AND EDIT

Mental Stability Test
Gun Control- Tighten

Recognizing that a firearm of deadly capabilities in the wrong hands can be a threat to society as a whole.

When a fire-arm is purchased the citizen must swear on an oath that this gun will not harm, friend of country or person but only foe of country or used in self defense.

Definition of Self Defense in definition being in protection of ones self when killing is the only option.

Demanding that all governments should issue a mental stability and sanity test to all those who are interested in purchasing a firearms

The test would consist of both personality and morality test.

Questions will vary according to nation but for a fire-arm or even ammunition larger than .30 caliber.

The United Peoples have edited the material provided by the Liberal Mexican ambassador, as requested by the Liberal Mexican's. The United Peoples reccommend removing any material with a strike through it, and reinforcing concepts that we have highlited (If there are any, I can't remember). Have a nice day.

We the corrupt or otherwise competent members of the House, Outhouse, Senate and whatever of the Nation of Suckeryou, Second the motion.

[Grays Harbor]

Congratulations for being the latest nomination of the John Kerry/Dianne Feinstein award for incompetence in Gun Control Writing.

Nicely put.

[Hirota]

Ambassador

I agree with you that the right of free speech is indeed sacrosact however
I stand firm in my position that this resolution should it be passed in its current form is a direct threat to our nation's security.

In the face of such threats I am sworn to act to defend our people.

These are not threats mr ambassador, merely unfortunate truths.

Ahhhh, the cute ickle baby nation wants to invade.

[Philimbesi]

They are so cute at that age aren't they.

[Grays Harbor]

I suppose that should they choose to invade nations 10 or 20 times their size and commit national suicide, that is up to them. It might prove a welcome change for our troops, though, having live targets instead of the plywood cutouts they currently use on the range. Don't want the men getting dulled, now do we? Seriously, though, Brikkel told me that there would be little nations like this who think they are the alpha banty rooster and really are nothing more than perhaps the alpha chickadee.

[Ainocra]

ooc et all

ROFLMAO

that is priceless

in a strictly ooc sense I am sick of gun control nuts they irritate me.
I have a concealed carry permit and generally carry a gun with me everywhere. my kids (13,15, and 16) have never shot anyone.
I have educated them about the dangers of firearms from the time they could walk and talk.

Had they actually ever shot anyone you know who would be at fault?

ME for not teaching them better.

Society would not be to blame in the least.

Again had they actually shot someone would it make sense to curtail your rights involving firearms when clearly I would be the one at fault?

Hell no, deal with those at fault in this scenario.

-----------------

This ooc Rant has been brought to you by a ravening band of Cuthulus!

-------------

Now I am IC again

---------------

*The ambassador is passed out in a drunken heap near his desk snoring lightly*

[Nordicus]

OOC: I agree with Ainocra about where the responsibility lies when a kid shoots somebody. I don't have a problem with a simple mental stability test for gun ownership (I don't think the crazies need to be running around with firearms), so long as it limits itself to actual medically-recognized mental health disorders that would make the individual unsafe as a firearms holder, e.g., schizophrenia. This proposal, however, goes too far with the requirements it sets.

[A mean old man]

OOC: I agree with Ainocra about where the responsibility lies when a kid shoots somebody. I don't have a problem with a simple mental stability test for gun ownership (I don't think the crazies need to be running around with firearms), so long as it limits itself to actual medically-recognized mental health disorders that would make the individual unsafe as a firearms holder, e.g., schizophrenia. This proposal, however, goes too far with the requirements it sets.

I tried to say that earlier and reserved a few specific ideas for a proposal of my own regarding that and regarding keeping guns away from those who are mentally handicapped (not exactly insane) or physically handicapped as well.

[Serrland]

I tried to say that earlier and reserved a few specific ideas for a proposal of my own regarding that and regarding keeping guns away from those who are mentally handicapped (not exactly insane) or physically handicapped as well.

Serrland would support such a notion, if properly defined and precisely worded. However, as has been stated previously, the delegate does not envy the one(s) responsible for attempting to define who is "mentally handicapped." It seems, given the vast differences in levels of functionality, that it would be difficult to pin down who would or wouldn't be eligible based on mental status.

[Itlmany]

you missing the people with back grounds part you could give a guy with murder, arson or etc in his background giving him a gun then he'll go around on a spree.

so no.