NATION

PASSWORD

Legallizing Biological Weapons (Up For Edit)

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Dystopian Polymarchy
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 165
Founded: May 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Legallizing Biological Weapons (Up For Edit)

Postby Dystopian Polymarchy » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:02 pm

Legalizing Biological Weapons


ACKNOWLEDGING that Biological Weapons are Weapon of Mass Destruction

KNOWING that most nations frown upon there use

WILL ALLOW the use of Biological Weapons in wars as a "Final Resort"

THESE WEAPONS will cause a factor called MAD (Mutaully Assured Destruction) if an attacking/defending nation threatens to use Biological Weapons.

FAILURE to follow the following rules may result in a trade embargo or a serious finacial payment determined by the other Nation.

IF A NATION IS TO USE A BIOLOGICAL WEAPON FOR OFFENCE:

1. The Nation must declare that they have and are ready to use Biological Missiles AND
Must declare what type of Biological Weapon that they are using
2. The Defending Nation Must Respond
3. Then Nation may activate the Bilogical weapon

IF A NATION IS USING A BIOLOGICAL WEAPON FOR DEFENCE/RETALIATION

1. The Nation does not have to declare the use, number of, or type of Biological Weapon
_______________________________________________________________________________________

Please give me some feedback!
Last edited by Dystopian Polymarchy on Thu Nov 26, 2009 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Grays Harbor
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Grays Harbor » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:13 pm

Honestly, these sound more like boardgame rules than an international accord on the use of biological weapons.

Our nation, which does not use biological weapons for any reason, but does understand that some do, finds that the section requiring that for offensive use a nation is required to inform their enemy where, when, how and with what they are attacking, and cannot legally attack until the enemy agree's? Did we read that correctly?
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Brave NewWorld
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 25
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Brave NewWorld » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 pm

We totally disagree. The issue in our council was talked about for just seven minutes. Than the decision was clear

We don't accept this conditions. So the anwser is no.

Elijah Baley, Emissary of The Brave NewWorld.
Last edited by Brave NewWorld on Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Elijah Baley, Enlightned Emissary of The Community of Brave New World.


"But I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin. "
"In fact, you are claiming the right to be unhappy."

User avatar
Omigodtheykilledkenny
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5725
Founded: Mar 14, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Omigodtheykilledkenny » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:49 pm

Don't you have to repeal the bioweapons ban first?
Omigodtheykilledkenny FAQ | "The Biggest Sovereigntist IN THE WORLD" - Chester Pearson

User avatar
Krioval
Minister
 
Posts: 2457
Founded: Jan 24, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Krioval » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:50 pm

One would need to repeal Biological Weapons Conference first. Otherwise, the proposal entered into record here is illegal.

[Lord] Ambassador Darvek Tyvok
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval

User avatar
Dystopian Polymarchy
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 165
Founded: May 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Dystopian Polymarchy » Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:07 pm

It is not that you cannot attack unless that your oponet responds that the akcnowledge (not agree) that you are using a biological weapon
Biological Weapons Spokeperson

Communism is like prohibition; it's a good idea in theory

User avatar
Dystopian Polymarchy
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 165
Founded: May 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Dystopian Polymarchy » Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:11 pm

Krioval wrote:One would need to repeal Biological Weapons Conference first. Otherwise, the proposal entered into record here is illegal.

[Lord] Ambassador Darvek Tyvok
Imperial Chiefdom of Krioval


I did not realise that there was a proposal that banned Biological Weapons. Maybe I should try to repeal that then.
Biological Weapons Spokeperson

Communism is like prohibition; it's a good idea in theory

User avatar
Enn
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1228
Founded: Jan 26, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Enn » Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:11 pm

Dystopian Polymarchy wrote:1. Must declare what virus/bacteria that they are using
2. The Defending Nation Must Respond
3. Then Nation may activate the Bilogical weapon

So prion, fungal and parasitic attacks are all good then?
I know what gay science is.
Reploid Productions wrote:The World Assembly as a whole terrifies me!
Pythagosaurus wrote:You are seriously deluded about the technical competence of the average human.

User avatar
Ilharessa
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 155
Founded: Nov 16, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ilharessa » Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:24 pm

Enn wrote:
Dystopian Polymarchy wrote:1. Must declare what virus/bacteria that they are using
2. The Defending Nation Must Respond
3. Then Nation may activate the Bilogical weapon

So prion, fungal and parasitic attacks are all good then?


"The honoured ambassador also forgot macroscopic biological weapons. The head of our nation's postal service still curls into a fetal position and screams about horrific red eyes and an 'orgy of blood and death' every time he sees a rabbit because of one such incident involving those," Velnayanis said.

User avatar
Chezchopoland
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 178
Founded: Nov 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Chezchopoland » Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:54 pm

I disagree, as you stated they are weapons of mass destruction, they should not be used at ANY time no matter what circumstances
Definetly not the Free-est!

Possesions of Chezchopoland:

User avatar
Fatiguely
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Nov 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Fatiguely » Sun Nov 29, 2009 9:25 pm

I have to question, why, in your proposal, would you have a regulation that requires them to forewarn the nation that biological weaponry will be used, when the whole purpose of biological weaponry is the destruction of life? It would make much more sense(and, as luck proves such, there is a bill) to disallow the use of biological weaponry, which places a higher value, if you will, on the lives of those who would be affected, as compared to allowing them time to...well, know that they will potentially die. Quite frankly, your proposal sounds illogical, and if it came to vote, no would be my spiteful decision.
Yar! Lemon Buccaneer of Fatiguely


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Anjelico

Advertisement

Remove ads