by Tsumii » Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:17 pm
by Grays Harbor » Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:16 am
by The Most Glorious Hack » Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:51 am
by Tsumii » Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:00 am
by West Newmanistan » Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:28 am
by Enn » Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:03 am
Tsumii wrote:can you give me any pointers on how to do that? maybe i can turn this first idea for the appeal into a resolution later on... by the way can we use real life pictures in our appeals?
thank you,
Tsumi Ookami
by The Altani Federation » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:07 am
by Gobbannium » Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:20 am
BELIEVING such-and-such to be a bad thing,
CONCERNED that something else undesirable is happening,
PADDING it out a bit purely for the purposes of example,
HEREBY REPEALS whichever resolution it was.
by Flibbleites » Mon Nov 09, 2009 8:56 am
So ban the use of nuclear weapons, the NAPA can't stop you from doing that.Tsumii wrote:APPALLED that WA members would CONSIDER the use of weapons of mass destruction against ANY NATION, member or non member.
So establish regulations on what you can target with nuclear weapons. Once again the NAPA doesn't cover that.Tsumii wrote:DISGUSTED that there is no regulation of what the targets can and cannot be.
Again the NAPA doesn't cover this, so you're free to write a resolution that does.Tsumii wrote:WORRIED that there is not any regulation on how the weapons of mass destruction can be handled or how many weapons of mass destruction that any nation can have.
by Ainocra » Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:49 am
by Hairballistan » Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:49 am
Speaking as the official spokesperson of Hairballistan, I submit that Hairballistan is willing to consider a non-aggression treaty with any nation that is willing will share it's WMD technology with Hairballistan.Tsumii wrote:BEFORE we consider the making or possession of weapons of mass destruction, I believe we need to talk things out with the non members and create treaties with them.
by Tsukasa-chan » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:15 am
by The Palentine » Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:10 am
Hairballistan wrote:Speaking as the official spokesperson of Hairballistan, I submit that Hairballistan is willing to consider a non-aggression treaty with any nation that is willing will share it's WMD technology with Hairballistan.Tsumii wrote:BEFORE we consider the making or possession of weapons of mass destruction, I believe we need to talk things out with the non members and create treaties with them.
by Philimbesi » Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:48 am
Hairballistan wrote:Speaking as the official spokesperson of Hairballistan, I submit that Hairballistan is willing to consider a non-aggression treaty with any nation that is willing will share it's WMD technology with Hairballistan.
by Grays Harbor » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:15 pm
Philimbesi wrote:Hairballistan wrote:Speaking as the official spokesperson of Hairballistan, I submit that Hairballistan is willing to consider a non-aggression treaty with any nation that is willing will share it's WMD technology with Hairballistan.
I would caution the good ambassador from Hairballistan that they might wish to further describe the method they wish other nations to share their WMD technology. There are many languages and share means many different things.
by Tsukasa-chan » Wed Nov 11, 2009 6:01 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: The Ice States
Advertisement