by James Bluntus » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:39 pm
by Bears Armed » Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:17 am
by Valipac » Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:33 am
by Philimbesi » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:38 am
Saying "My resolution proposes" in the resolution is redundant and unprofessional.
I took the liberty to run correct your spelling at no extra charge.The WA recognizes that privatization causes higher prices, reduced job opportunities and less reliability in the industry that is privatized.
by Grays Harbor » Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:43 am
by James Bluntus » Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:54 am
by Triniteras » Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:05 am
Grays Harbor wrote:What the WA does not need is political ideological postureing
by Meekinos » Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:43 am
by James Bluntus » Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:03 am
James Bluntus wrote:Furtherment of DemocracyA resolution to increase democratic freedoms.
Description: Description: My resolution is to prevent the privatisation of government assets when it isn't in the interest of the people.
The WA recognises that privatisation causes higher prices, reduced job opportunities and less reliabilty in the industry that is privatised.
The WA relises that it needs to do something to moniter the individual cases to prevent unsatifactory proposals getting passed without a WA review. I therefore propose that we form the International Privatisation Regulation Council(IPRC). This Council will oversee the handling of every privatisation of government assets.
This Resolution doesn't prohibit privatisation but it assure that every person gets a say in the privatision, not just the elected representives. Every case has to go through the parliament and if passed has to go to a referendum to be voted on by the people of that country.
Strength:significant
by Serbian_Soviet_Union » Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:41 am
James Bluntus wrote:Furtherment of DemocracyA resolution to increase democratic freedoms.
Description: Description: My resolution is to prevent the privatisation of government assets when it isn't in the interest of the people.
The WA recognises that privatisation causes higher prices, reduced job opportunities and less reliabilty in the industry that is privatised.
The WA relises that it needs to do something to moniter the individual cases to prevent unsatifactory proposals getting passed without a WA review. I therefore propose that we form the International Privatisation Regulation Council(IPRC). This Council will oversee the handling of every privatisation of government assets.
This Resolution doesn't prohibit privatisation but it assure that every person gets a say in the privatision, not just the elected representives. Every case has to go through the parliament and if passed has to go to a referendum to be voted on by the people of that country.
Strength:significant
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Jul 12, 2009 5:00 am
by Glen-Rhodes » Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:19 am
by Morlago » Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:31 am
by Bears Armed » Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:33 am
Glen-Rhodes wrote:(OOC: In my opinion, this resolution is impossible, because it does not fit in any category. Furtherment of Democracy is decidedly for the expansion of political freedoms and rights. I can't see any category that would fit what you are trying to accomplish.)
by James Bluntus » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:12 am
James Bluntus wrote:Furtherment of DemocracyA resolution to increase democratic freedoms.
The WA,
RECOGNISES that privatisation causes higher prices, reduced job opportunities and less reliabilty in the industry that is privatised.
REALISES that it needs to do something to moniter the individual cases to prevent unsatifactory proposals getting passed without a WA review. I therefore propose that we form the International Privatisation Regulation Council(IPRC). This Council will oversee the handling of every privatisation of government assets.
STRESSES not to prohibit privatisation but assure that every person gets a say in the privatision, not just the elected representives. Every case has to go through the parliament and if passed has to go to a referendum to be voted on by the people of that country.
Strength:significant
by Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:27 am
James Bluntus wrote:James Bluntus wrote:Furtherment of DemocracyA resolution to increase democratic freedoms.
The WA,
RECOGNISES that privatisation causes higher prices, reduced job opportunities and less reliabilty in the industry that is privatised.
REALISES that it needs to do something to moniter the individual cases to prevent unsatifactory proposals getting passed without a WA review. I therefore propose that we form the International Privatisation Regulation Council(IPRC). This Council will oversee the handling of every privatisation of government assets.
STRESSES not to prohibit privatisation but assure that every person gets a say in the privatision, not just the elected representives. Every case has to go through the parliament and if passed has to go to a referendum to be voted on by the people of that country.
Strength:significant
This is the Updated version.
by The Palentine » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:59 am
by James Bluntus » Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:41 pm
Efficiancy, competition, profits, and increased jobs comes from the private sector. Of course they are much more risky, but greater risk equal greater rewards. Govermnent run business, by their very nature, are inefficient, heavily subsidized,fail to make a profit, and cannot compete in the free market. Sure the goods produced might seem cheap to the consumers in the nation involved, but they'll pay for it in higher taxes(especially the weathy), thus causing those with capital to leave said country.
by The Palentine » Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:41 am
by Travancore-Cochin » Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:19 am
by Serbian_Soviet_Union » Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:15 pm
James Bluntus wrote:Furtherment of DemocracyA resolution to increase democratic freedoms.
The WA,
RECOGNISES that privatisation causes higher prices, reduced job opportunities and less reliabilty in the industry that is privatised.
REALISES that it needs to do something to moniter the individual cases to prevent unsatifactory proposals getting passed without a WA review. I therefore propose that we form the International Privatisation Regulation Council(IPRC). This Council will oversee the handling of every privatisation of government assets.
STRESSES not to prohibit privatisation but assure that every person gets a say in the privatision, not just the elected representives. Every case has to go through the parliament and if passed has to go to a referendum to be voted on by the people of that country.
Strength:significant
by Bears Armed » Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:37 am
Serbian_Soviet_Union wrote:James Bluntus wrote:Furtherment of DemocracyA resolution to increase democratic freedoms.
The WA,
RECOGNISES that privatisation causes higher prices, reduced job opportunities and less reliabilty in the industry that is privatised.
REALISES that it needs to do something to moniter the individual cases to prevent unsatifactory proposals getting passed without a WA review. I therefore propose that we form the International Privatisation Regulation Council(IPRC). This Council will oversee the handling of every privatisation of government assets.
STRESSES not to prohibit privatisation but assure that every person gets a say in the privatision, not just the elected representives. Every case has to go through the parliament and if passed has to go to a referendum to be voted on by the people of that country.
Strength:significant
Illegal, wrong category,
Does not force 'communism' on member states, becasue it doesn't even ban the privatisation of any assets that are already in government hands let alone require the nationalisation of any other assets: Despite the biased langauge in its preamble, all that it actually does is require governments to hold public referendums (whose results they must heed) before carrying out any privatisations...Serbian_Soviet_Union wrote:partially idealogical as it tries to force communism amoung WA member states. Privatisation must be left to each individual nation states.
by Serbian_Soviet_Union » Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:50 am
by Bears Armed » Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:10 am
Serbian_Soviet_Union wrote:This should solely be left to the individual state as it is a sovereign rights, some nations already hold referendoms regarding privatisation, but not all will do, and those that do not choose to have a referendom regarding privatisation should not be forced to.
by James Bluntus » Fri Jul 31, 2009 5:26 am
The Palentine wrote:The only two products of any value or worth ever produced by government run businesses were vodka and furry hats.
The only business government should be involved with are fire prevention, law enforcement, and National Defense(ie. The military).
It is through the lure of the possibility of making a profit that encourages businesses to take risks and develop new products, better technology, or more cost effective methods of production. A government run business does not have to show a profit, and thus any incentive for research and efficiency are nullified. Why would I as an employee or engineer want to work hard to make something new, if I won't be rewarded for my hard work, and effort. If I'm going to be paid the same as some useless slug sitting next to me, then why bother.
You claim that products are cheaper, if the industry is nationalized. However that business is usally heavily subsidized by the government. Now where in the bloody hell do you think that money is going to come from. It will be coming from your citizens in higher taxes to pay for it all. Yeah, they'll be crushed by higher taxes, but at least they'll have a lot of cheap vodka to drink, and cheap furry hats to wear.
Excelsior,
Sen. Horatio Sulla
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Nu Elysium, Simone Republic
Advertisement