Ban Black Hole technology

by **Almagarde** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:23 am

Because Black Holes expand forward and Backward through time from their point of origin, I must recommend a ban on man made black holes and the pursuit of that Science on the grounds that they can be used to isolate and erase individuals and family lines from existance.

Considering the only acceptable form of government is one based on consent of the global population We must assume that those in Power are the benificiaries of Representative Government and are thus the benificiaries of the Use of Black Hole Weapons used to remove consent government and replace it with a minority dictatorship.

Ban Black Holes NOW!

Commonwealth of Almagarde

by **Stash Kroh** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:31 am

The Protection of Outer Space Act bans the damaging of Space, Ambassador.

And this is an issue anyway for the General Assembly, not the Security Council. Unless of course you know of some nation you'd like to condemn for their horrific meddling in time/space.

by **Sionis Prioratus** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:31 pm

Almagarde wrote:Ban Black Holes NOW!

No more sewers?

by **Enn** » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:35 pm

Short of speeding up Hawking radiation (something far beyond the capacity of Ennish engineers, although perhaps Almagarde knows something we don't), I am unsure exactly how we 'ban black holes'.

Stephanie Fulton,
WA Ambassador for Enn

by **Hirota** » Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:24 am

Almagarde wrote:Because Black Holes expand forward and Backward through time from their point of origin, I must recommend a ban on man made black holes and the pursuit of that Science on the grounds that they can be used to isolate and erase individuals and family lines from existance.

Considering the only acceptable form of government is one based on consent of the global population We must assume that those in Power are the benificiaries of Representative Government and are thus the benificiaries of the Use of Black Hole Weapons used to remove consent government and replace it with a minority dictatorship.

Ban Black Holes NOW!

Commonwealth of Almagarde

OOC: Someone has spent far too much time watching the new star trek.

by **Ainocra** » Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:21 am

*with a straight face*
we can't my country is in the process of creating the worlds 1,532,366th largest supercollider capable of making black holes once the universe expands to about 50 times its current size.

by **Physilitis** » Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:32 am

Ainocra wrote:*with a straight face*
we can't my country is in the process of creating the worlds 1,532,366th largest supercollider capable of making black holes once the universe expands to about 50 times its current size.

Anicora: lolnouphail.

Almagarde: Generally, this is an internet game not real life, no black hole will extent to NS Planet.And black holes only grow to the size of blue supergiants.

by **Carbarosia** » Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:33 am

Removed.

by **Philimbesi** » Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:24 am

We regret to say that we would enjoin you in this endeavor to ban black holes but as we are currently involved in drafting litigation to ban hurricanes, tsunamis, tornadoes, solar flares and flatulence we are fresh out of time. Once we get these measures past we will be able join you in the rest of the fight against things that only happen naturally.

Signed,
Nigel S Youlkin
USoP WA Ambassador (and mad scientist)

by **Uranus Territory** » Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:00 pm

I'm against because it could be a problem for my nation. There are a large number of black holes in Uranus Territory. Admittedly, they have very little gravity, but they are still black holes.

by **Charlotte Ryberg** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:25 am

In our nation we, in part, among with other sources of futuristic energy, use black holes that already exist for the generation of electricity by physics.

by **Nafistan** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:09 pm

I am unsure what this means. Does this proposal ban the use of black holes or the military use of black holes or something else?

by **Muffasaville** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:15 pm

The The Protection of Outer Space Act only protects space outside of a planets atmosphere. Therefore, on-planet black whole research is permitted under current laws.

However, the investigation and experimentation of black holes is necessary to the continuing of science and scientific study. If you would like to propose a ban on black hole weapons research that would be a different story.

by **Sionis Prioratus** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:29 pm

Muffasaville wrote:If you would like to propose a ban on black hole weapons research that would be a different story.

Now you made me curious... How does one exactly deploy a black hole?

by **Flibbleites** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:10 pm

Sionis Prioratus wrote:
Muffasaville wrote:If you would like to propose a ban on black hole weapons research that would be a different story.

Now you made me curious... How does one exactly deploy a black hole?

Very carefully.

Timothy Schmidt
Bob Flibble's PA

by **Mexar** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:28 pm

Black holes really suck!

by **Bears Armed** » Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:44 am

Are we still allowed to call them 'black' holes?

by **Almagarde** » Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:57 am

Philimbesi wrote:We regret to say that we would enjoin you in this endeavor to ban black holes but as we are currently involved in drafting litigation to ban hurricanes, tsunamis, tornadoes, solar flares and flatulence we are fresh out of time. Once we get these measures past we will be able join you in the rest of the fight against things that only happen naturally.

Signed,
Nigel S Youlkin
USoP WA Ambassador (and mad scientist)

RE: Antitemporal Fallout resulting from Possibility manipulation using blackholes

Hurricanes
Tsunamis
Tornadoes
Solar Flares

by **The Fedral Union** » Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:13 am

A notable Terran researcher, took the time and effort from his pursuit of exploring temporal and dimensional theories and technological applications weighed in via message:

Black holes do not work that way , also as our nation is not part of the world assembly, such a self centered body filled with people clinging to tera I can continue my experiments as I wish. Good day.

(OOC: Black hole bombs are usually used by soft scifi or space opera nations as weapons, there are many bits of technobable that can be applied to make an artificial one. Focusing gravity waves using a "graviton beam" or some thing like that is just one example.)

by **Philimbesi** » Thu Oct 01, 2009 5:16 am

Sionis Prioratus wrote:Now you made me curious... How does one exactly deploy a black hole?

well first you load all the cheese into the back of the minis...

by **Bears Armed** » Thu Oct 01, 2009 5:29 am

Sionis Prioratus wrote:
Muffasaville wrote:If you would like to propose a ban on black hole weapons research that would be a different story.

Now you made me curious... How does one exactly deploy a black hole?

Purely OOC: according to SF author Larry Niven you pour lots of electrically-charged matter (all charged in the same polarity) into it, so that it develops an overall charge of its own, and then use elctromagnetism to move it around...

by **Cinistra** » Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:33 am

This proposal is a joke,eh? If it's not, I am against it. Scientific progress must go on regardless of people's fears and superstitions.

by **Stormcliffe** » Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:31 pm

Every last 'argument' presented here is both invalid and unsound. We recommend that each and every one of you run down to the nearest bookstore and buy a primer on formal logic.
Your mere presences infuriates me with its presumption.