NATION

PASSWORD

[Split from GA Proposals Q&A] National Sovereignty rule

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 27802
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Capitalizt

Postby Frisbeeteria » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:55 am

Auralia wrote:Again, as I already stated, the makeup of the WA changes over time. The opinions of all the nations who join after a resolution has passed should also be taken into account in the democratic process.

Then come up with additional reasons that appeal to the new majority. We've made this very clear, and the rule isn't going to be changed.

Now unless someone has something new to contribute to this thread, let's stop arguing the same points.

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Auralia » Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:59 am

Frisbeeteria wrote:
Auralia wrote:Again, as I already stated, the makeup of the WA changes over time. The opinions of all the nations who join after a resolution has passed should also be taken into account in the democratic process.

Then come up with additional reasons that appeal to the new majority. We've made this very clear, and the rule isn't going to be changed.

Now unless someone has something new to contribute to this thread, let's stop arguing the same points.


National sovereignty is a reason. It's perfectly valid to believe that something just shouldn't be an international issue.

But you're right - I'll withdraw from this discussion, since I can see that this is pointless.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

Previous

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads