by Bergnovinaia » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:45 pm
by Qumkent » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:56 pm
by Bergnovinaia » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:57 pm
Qumkent wrote:Every part of this statute is completely absurd, we cannot hope to be confident that the authors of this mess will have the requisite foresight and perspicacity to compass the work they have presumed to undertake, we strongly urge them to desist and seek less complicated and controversial issues to takle.
Yours,
by Qumkent » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:10 pm
Bergnovinaia wrote:Qumkent wrote:Every part of this statute is completely absurd, we cannot hope to be confident that the authors of this mess will have the requisite foresight and perspicacity to compass the work they have presumed to undertake, we strongly urge them to desist and seek less complicated and controversial issues to takle.
Yours,
What is so contreversial about it? This mainly prevents fraud and sets good standards for banks to abide by.
by Bergnovinaia » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:16 pm
Qumkent wrote:Bergnovinaia wrote:Qumkent wrote:Every part of this statute is completely absurd, we cannot hope to be confident that the authors of this mess will have the requisite foresight and perspicacity to compass the work they have presumed to undertake, we strongly urge them to desist and seek less complicated and controversial issues to takle.
Yours,
What is so contreversial about it? This mainly prevents fraud and sets good standards for banks to abide by.
Your Excellency seriously believes that a statute which directly interferes with member states banking regulations is not controversial ? The structures of thousands of nation's economies are at stake, and we are concerned that your Excellency does not fully comprehend the full import of the matter at hand which further decreases our confidence that your Excellency is prepared to deal properly with it.
That's true. However, I alwyas want more opinions but your's is valued.
Yours,
by Bears Armed » Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:54 am
by Bergnovinaia » Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:58 am
Bears Armed wrote:Imposing more regulations on an industry, as this draft would, is not 'Free Trade'.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:10 am
by Firstaria » Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:23 am
3.Policies to follow when foreclosing
a)Banks are to notify the patron 30 days prior to foreclosing.
b)Banks are to send a secondary notice if 15 days elapse and no payment is received.
c)If payment is received within the 30 day period or another agreement is reached all action of foreclosure against the patron must cease.
d)If a bank does foreclose on a patron’s property, they may do with it as they deem fit.
e)If a bank fails to submit notice of foreclosure 30 days and 15 days prior to foreclosure, the foreclosure is null and void.
by Tanara » Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:20 pm
by Krioval » Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:54 pm
by WallachIX » Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:21 pm
by Bergnovinaia » Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:22 pm
WallachIX wrote:i like the idea of this bill [especially given its pertinence to contemporary real life].
i think it would be better if it targeted the regulation of banks to prevent loss of money rather than dealing with fraud, how to reconcile when it is lost, and what sort of legal action may be taken in such an event.
as in, recognising the important role banking institutions play in the world economy and society's welfare, we should have regulations set up to prevent sub-prime loaning [en masse]; encourage members to adopt a more responsible system. e.g. how about adoption of laws that require banks to insure 80% of the money deposited in them?
by Surote » Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:29 pm
by Altani WA Mission » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:46 pm
by Bergnovinaia » Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:04 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:11 am
by Bergnovinaia » Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:16 am
by Grays Harbor » Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:00 pm
by Stormcliffe » Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:05 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Were this a proposal to regulate interactions between banks on an international scale, we might be able to support this. There does indeed need to be a set of standard international regulations and guidelines set for those transactions. However, it is our belief that for purely domestic banking affairs, it is best for each nations government to decide what is best for their country and people.
by Bergnovinaia » Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:59 pm
by Seculartopia » Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:07 pm
Rhodmire wrote:4/5 for being bold enough to put up what looks like something made from MS Paint.
That takes balls, and you've got them.
All was dark when the armies surrounded the town. There was little bloodshed as they swept in, and they quickly took control. "Success," said a communicator, "a base has been established."
OOC:There. Now, we'll wait for UK to catch up.
by Bergnovinaia » Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:29 am
Seculartopia wrote:A major problem i see with this is maintaining this throughout the NS realm of corporate bordellos to communist police states.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement