by The Left-Libertarian Hippies » Sun Nov 20, 2011 6:10 pm
by The Left-Libertarian Hippies » Sun Nov 20, 2011 6:12 pm
by Ardchoille » Sun Nov 20, 2011 7:15 pm
by Rotovia- » Sun Nov 20, 2011 7:29 pm
by Rotovia- » Sun Nov 20, 2011 7:31 pm
by Latanii » Sun Nov 20, 2011 9:13 pm
by The Left-Libertarian Hippies » Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:35 pm
Latanii wrote:I am a bit confused, you start by saying "that many of the decisions that have significant and far-reaching impacts on our global economy are made by powerful governments and large corporations, largely irrespective of local concerns." Then further down you speak of "Promoting a balanced economic agenda that favors neither workers nor business interests over each other."
The first statement is obviously alluding to workers/individual's rights or situations, how then do you plan on being impartial when this is at the forefront?
by Eternal Yerushalayim » Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:56 am
by Libraria and Ausitoria » Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:24 am
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:so that important choices that can massively affect the economic growth of WA member states shall be made in a consensus fashion.
DEMANDS that WA member states invest in educating all citizens on economic policy initiatives and the fundamental theories of modern economics in a non-biased and factual manner through secondary and tertiary education.
REQUIRES nations to develop policies that encourage widespread and responsible access to capital, thorugh cooperatives, small businesses, a decentralized corporate structure, publicly-owned enterprises, etc.
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]
by Ardchoille » Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:33 am
OOC: This ain't II. Your ambassador is speaking in the General Assembly chamber, so you' don't need communications with a letterhead. It gives (me) the impression you're making a junior staffer stand up and wave the crest around every time he speaks. Practical reason is, it clogs up the thread.Rotovia- wrote:<snip big logo>
by Keronians » Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:37 pm
by Keronians » Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:55 pm
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:The Economic Consensus Act
Category: Social Justice
Strength: Mild
KNOWING that many of the decisions that have significant and far-reaching impacts on our global economy are made by powerful governments and large corporations, largely irrespective of local concerns.
UNDERSTANDING that this gap between governments, individuals, and corporations in decision making and cohesion can lead to devastating impacts for individuals across the WA member-states.
WISHING to promote a more just, equal, free, and decentralized economic structure for all member-states, regardless of the current economic system that they currently promote and use.
ESTABLISHES the Socioeconomic Policy Forum that will serve the main purposes of:
1. Clarifying the policies of trade unions, businesses, governments, and other organizations through an open and democratic forum.
2. Allowing economic data and decisions to be presented openly to the public at large, so that individuals can have a greater understanding of the economic decisions that are affecting them.
3. Promoting economic solidarity and cohesion on policy decisions, so that important choices that can massively affect the economic growth of WA member states shall be made in a consensus fashion.
4. Promoting a balanced economic agenda that favors neither workers nor business interests over each other.
5.Giving small businesses, family farms, and local trade unions more say in the economic policy decisions that will affect them.
ENCOURAGES WA member states to use both the Socioeconomic Policy Forum and other smaller, regional forums to negotiate disputes between labor, shareholders, business managers, etc.
DEMANDS that WA member states invest in educating all citizens on economic policy initiatives and the fundamental theories of modern economics in a non-biased and factual manner through secondary and tertiary education.
REQUIRES nations to develop policies that encourage widespread and responsible access to capital, thorugh cooperatives, small businesses, a decentralized corporate structure, publicly-owned enterprises, etc.
ENCOURAGES the use of partnerships between the public, private, and social sectors of the economy to strengthen and stabilize economic growth.
RECOGNIZING that a decentralized economic structure and careful consensus management of disputes and strife can lead to lower and more stable income inequality and promote civil and political as well as economic rights of citizens.
ALSO RECOGNIZING that economic globalization and free trade can unleash fair competition between businesses and the free flow of information and creativity and is made stronger by a democratic consensus model that can be applied throughout WA member states.
ADVISES member-states to use wise and careful economic policies such as long-term and stable public borrowing, inflation targeting, and developing measures that will promote near-full employment.
ASSURES that both policy forums and economic democracy initiatives shall not undermine the private and public sectors of WA member states along with the social sector and are not state planning measures.
THIS forum cannot:
1. Take away the national roles of economic decision making of individual WA member states.
2. Enforce or establish new international laws.
3. Set tax or budget policy.
ALL FUNDING for this forum shall come from voluntary contributions by individual WA member states and their citizens.
by Delgrae » Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:55 pm
by Glen-Rhodes » Mon Nov 21, 2011 6:23 pm
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:1. Clarifying the policies of trade unions, businesses, governments, and other organizations through an open and democratic forum.
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:5.Giving small businesses, family farms, and local trade unions more say in the economic policy decisions that will affect them.
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:REQUIRES nations to develop policies that encourage widespread and responsible access to capital, thorugh cooperatives, small businesses, a decentralized corporate structure, publicly-owned enterprises, etc.
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:RECOGNIZING that a decentralized economic structure and careful consensus management of disputes and strife can lead to lower and more stable income inequality and promote civil and political as well as economic rights of citizens.
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:1. Take away the national roles of economic decision making of individual WA member states.
2. Enforce or establish new international laws.
3. Set tax or budget policy.
by Bythyrona » Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:13 pm
by Libraria and Ausitoria » Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:17 am
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]
by Ardchoille » Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:30 am
by Bears Armed » Tue Nov 22, 2011 6:30 am
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:DEMANDS that WA member states invest in educating all citizens on economic policy initiatives and the fundamental theories of modern economics in a non-biased and factual manner through secondary and tertiary education.
by Latanii » Tue Nov 22, 2011 9:18 am
The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:Latanii wrote:I am a bit confused, you start by saying "that many of the decisions that have significant and far-reaching impacts on our global economy are made by powerful governments and large corporations, largely irrespective of local concerns." Then further down you speak of "Promoting a balanced economic agenda that favors neither workers nor business interests over each other."
The first statement is obviously alluding to workers/individual's rights or situations, how then do you plan on being impartial when this is at the forefront?
How does treating workers and business owners equally and impartially have anything in contradiction with the localization of economic decisions?
by The Left-Libertarian Hippies » Wed Nov 23, 2011 3:09 pm
by Libraria and Ausitoria » Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:49 am
Ardchoille wrote:II=International Incidents. A fully RP forum, like NationStates. NS is traditionally explained as more character-oriented, with II being for wars or other massive movements of states, but the boundaries are fluid. However, you'll often see II roleplays opening with a string of national crests as nations jockey for position.
Libraria and Ausitoria wrote:We have a few little objections:The Left-Libertarian Hippies wrote:so that important choices that can massively affect the economic growth of WA member states shall be made in a consensus fashion.
'Shall'? Can we make that 'may'? We don't want it to have to be 'consensus'? Who defines 'consensus'?
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]
by Merfurian » Thu Apr 12, 2012 1:10 am
by Syrkania » Thu Apr 12, 2012 1:38 am
Merfurian wrote:I'm going to put this on tab. Currently, I'm dealing with four repeals, one replacement-for-a-proposal, and three new-resolutions. I am not paid enough to spend lots of time dealing with resolutions, so this will have to wait for my attention until one of the other proposals is disposed of.
Klause Uliyan
etc
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bananaistan, Practrik
Advertisement