by Dilange » Sun Oct 09, 2011 6:33 pm
by Astro-Malsitari WA Seat » Sun Oct 09, 2011 6:46 pm
by Dilange » Sun Oct 09, 2011 6:49 pm
Astro-Malsitari WA Seat wrote:This- I- uh- We- edep-
Ambassador, is this a serious proposal? Because all I can think of right now is Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
by Masoleumi » Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:07 pm
Dilange wrote:Category: Free Trade
Strength: Significant
INTERESTED by the possibilities of new ways to gain commerce and revenue
NOTING that graveyards and cemeteries are becoming over-populated with the dead.
INTERESTED in the advancement of health and medicine in a safe yet practical way.
CONVINCED that nations need a new way to test weaponry and military strategies.
Hereby,
LEGALIZES the practice and business of bodysnatching, that doesnt involves the bodysnatcher murdering the bodysnatchee.
MANDATES that the bodysnatchees must register prior their death, to have their body donated after they die.
RECOMMENDS bodysnatchers donate the bodies to hospitals, military, pharmaceutical companies, univeristies, weapons facilities, or any other medical/military related facility.
MANDATES that bodysnatchers must contact, inform, and gain permission from the families of the bodysnatchees befor they take their corpse from the graveyard or morgue
MANDATES that bodysnatchers contact graveyard owners or caretakers before removing a corpse out of their grave, crypt, maulseloum,etc.
NOTING that each nation has the right to regulate bodysnatching in anyway they want too.
by The Eternal Kawaii » Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:10 pm
Dilange wrote:Can i have some feedbakc please.
by Masoleumi » Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:13 pm
by Creliatoplis » Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:14 pm
by Masoleumi » Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:15 pm
Creliatoplis wrote:I believe this could be a good thing. I would endorse it and vote for it.
by Libraria and Ausitoria » Mon Oct 10, 2011 1:47 am
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]
by New New York » Mon Oct 10, 2011 1:57 am
by SophiaPetrillo » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:35 am
by Masoleumi » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:06 am
Libraria and Ausitoria wrote:Um... could someone define bodysnatching please?
by Masoleumi » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:10 am
New New York wrote:It might be best if this could be written without using the term 'bodysnatching'. Obviously a definition would help, but the term still conjures up ideas of possession/impersonation rather than the use of human remains.
by Masoleumi » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:17 am
SophiaPetrillo wrote:An 85 year old woman looks around the hallowed halls of the World Assembly, herself and her nation admitted into this glorious union. Her stature is Romanesque and short, her face wrinkled, and she is walking through the chamber in her floral dress, support pantyhose, and orthopedic shoes. Around her neck a simple and smart string of pearls. She hears the discussion, which causes her to pause as she approaches her newly appointed seat. A look of indignation appears on her face as he resumes sitting down. She peers at the delegation through her moderately thick lenses on her wide-rimmed glasses.
When the floor quiets, she stands up and speaks, "Greeting, fellow delegates. I am Sophia Petrillo, and I am new to these halls. So forgive me if I seem to be jumping head first into the world of international politics. However, after reading this proposal, and listening to the debate thus far, I am somewhat puzzled that such a resolution is even needed. At my age of life, of course, it would be nice to know some science major at university isn't going to dig me up for some experiment after my time has come. Is it really worth the time and energy of this esteemed body to even worry about such legislation when there are more pressing matters?"
by Vatikahn » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:31 am
Dilange wrote:Astro-Malsitari WA Seat wrote:This- I- uh- We- edep-
Ambassador, is this a serious proposal? Because all I can think of right now is Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
Indedd it is, body snatching is olde practice that can be renovated for current commerce.
And it goes with our new motto. "Well if Legalizing Prostiution got passed, anything is possible."
by Masoleumi » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:38 am
Vatikahn wrote:Dilange wrote:
Indedd it is, body snatching is olde practice that can be renovated for current commerce.
And it goes with our new motto. "Well if Legalizing Prostiution got passed, anything is possible."
You overtax, no misunderstood the world assembly target the deeper aim is to conclusion, would you agree with the 30 humanlaws and they not explecite ban of execoution, execoution is frail ? or prefer a explecit 31 humanlaw that execoution ban?
to your propose it harm the civilfreedom, but would be happend when a human died in arrest? does he/she loose his/her civilrights by law? hm..
by Dilange » Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:40 am
Vatikahn wrote:Dilange wrote:
Indedd it is, body snatching is olde practice that can be renovated for current commerce.
And it goes with our new motto. "Well if Legalizing Prostiution got passed, anything is possible."
You overtax, no misunderstood the world assembly target the deeper aim is to conclusion, would you agree with the 30 humanlaws and they not explecite ban of execoution, execoution is frail ? or prefer a explecit 31 humanlaw that execoution ban?
to your propose it harm the civilfreedom, but would be happend when a human died in arrest? does he/she loose his/her civilrights by law? hm..
by Dilange » Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:42 am
Masoleumi wrote:Dilange wrote:Category: Free Trade
Strength: Significant
INTERESTED by the possibilities of new ways to gain commerce and revenue
NOTING that graveyards and cemeteries are becoming over-populated with the dead.
INTERESTED in the advancement of health and medicine in a safe yet practical way.
CONVINCED that nations need a new way to test weaponry and military strategies.
Hereby,
LEGALIZES the practice and business of bodysnatching, that doesnt involves the bodysnatcher murdering the bodysnatchee.
MANDATES that the bodysnatchees must register prior their death, to have their body donated after they die.
RECOMMENDS bodysnatchers donate the bodies to hospitals, military, pharmaceutical companies, univeristies, weapons facilities, or any other medical/military related facility.
MANDATES that bodysnatchers must contact, inform, and gain permission from the families of the bodysnatchees befor they take their corpse from the graveyard or morgue
MANDATES that bodysnatchers contact graveyard owners or caretakers before removing a corpse out of their grave, crypt, maulseloum,etc.
NOTING that each nation has the right to regulate bodysnatching in anyway they want too.
Ah. An elegantly proposal dear mortal. As the Necromancer Gadol, I love to see more about death and how we can relate it into the living world. In our society, death is a goal in life and one that is brought to us by fortune and the loyal. we will be able to give their bodies, empty shells of ones who lived a new purpose in the world instead of sitting the ground to rot and waste away such as erosion happens to rocks. Medicine and military are key to survival, we would hate to see organ go to waste and go to the greed. This si necessary in the new international world, may the world see this as a way to save lives more than an actual faction of business and capital.
Once our grand order gains enterance into these hallowed halls, we would be happy to support this proposal. We also would like to see what other fine ambassadors have to say. Everyones critism is needed and everyones ideas need to be portrayed. Thank you for your attention.
From the Desk of,
Azazel III
Necromancer Gadol and Future Delegate to the WA
by Dilange » Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:43 am
Masoleumi wrote:New New York wrote:It might be best if this could be written without using the term 'bodysnatching'. Obviously a definition would help, but the term still conjures up ideas of possession/impersonation rather than the use of human remains.
He has a point Mr. Rocchesloan, I feel that people are getting confused by the term "bodysnatching"....maybe you could posibly change the title to "On the Selling Of Corpses" and just go from there.
From the Desk of:
Azazel III
Necromancer Gadol and Delegate to the WA
by Vatikahn » Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:10 am
Dilange wrote:Vatikahn wrote:
You overtax, no misunderstood the world assembly target the deeper aim is to conclusion, would you agree with the 30 humanlaws and they not explecite ban of execoution, execoution is frail ? or prefer a explecit 31 humanlaw that execoution ban?
to your propose it harm the civilfreedom, but would be happend when a human died in arrest? does he/she loose his/her civilrights by law? hm..
Eh-er-I mean- quite-umm.... What the hell did you just say?
by Dilange » Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:16 am
Vatikahn wrote:Dilange wrote:
Eh-er-I mean- quite-umm.... What the hell did you just say?
Try again, you can donate your organs after braindeath when you or a relative say so. Hm.., may you change when you get your reletive back looking like a empty basket, oh you can safe people from dying but no one said to you what they do with the corpus because near zero would say do. So, only with a explicit replacement part book and dediciering those parts, the organextraction by selfdecite is tolerable, your proposal sounds inflationär.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: New Beulah Land, Simone Republic
Advertisement