Why dont you scroll up and then you will seee
Advertisement

by Great Azarath » Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:41 pm

by Dizyntk » Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:41 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:Great Azarath wrote:No, for a majority I have respond pretty well....buddy.
Now you are simply trying to be obnoxious. The Azarathian delegation has proven to have the mental faculties of a fourteen-year old child. Since the Azarathian delegation will not rise to my challenge for them to submit the proposal and see where it goes, then we can only assume that the Azarathians are in agreement that such a proposal could never pass.

by Dilange » Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:42 pm
Great Azarath wrote:You are twisting it....not once in this resolution does it say that.
Theres more than just bith control and condoms.
Didn't I already say my age? How old are you btw?

by Separatist Peoples » Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:44 pm
Dizyntk wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:
Now you are simply trying to be obnoxious. The Azarathian delegation has proven to have the mental faculties of a fourteen-year old child. Since the Azarathian delegation will not rise to my challenge for them to submit the proposal and see where it goes, then we can only assume that the Azarathians are in agreement that such a proposal could never pass.
"Agreed with Amdassador DaSiablo. And Ambassador, please refrain from insulting fourteen-year olds."

by Great Azarath » Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:47 pm
Dilange wrote:Great Azarath wrote:1- you keep saying that but fail to tell us what the point it.
How do you plan on telling prostitutes the risk when they prolly already know them?2- Are you saying prostitution has nothing to do with sex?
DIdnt say that at all. I said its more of a business transaction...a contract is unnessessary.3- You can get a disease from anyone.....doesnt have to be a prostitute. What abbout your husband or wife?
I know that. But its more likely from a prostitute.4- Again that is not legal, therefore irrelevant.
Actually it is legal, and if not show proof.

by Dilange » Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:52 pm
Great Azarath wrote:1- If they "prolly" know the risk then what exactly is your problem with it?
2- Eh, I sorta agree about the contract
3- No, your just as likely. They both are live beings.
4- Dont remember what is being spoken of...
The problems where brothels aren't safer than just working alone.
by Alqania » Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:54 pm
Great Azarath wrote:Alqania wrote:
"I would like to implore Your Excellency to refrain from implying that there is no difference between Her Royal Highness and a common street thug."
And who are you referring to as a street thug? Btw, did you say dizynkt said she wouldn't have unprotected sex with a stranger?

by Dizyntk » Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:56 pm

by Great Azarath » Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:59 pm
Dilange wrote:Great Azarath";p="6866
427 wrote:You are twisting it....not once in this resolution does it say that.
I think you should re-read your first line of your proposal.Theres more than just bith control and condoms.
And such as? Many others don't have a good liablity rating...and some diseases cant be stopped.Didn't I already say my age? How old are you btw?
You did. I work at a legal office for overseas law and trade. So old enough...

by Dilange » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:02 pm
Great Azarath wrote:No where does it say it can be legalized specifically because it is ancient
I dont know this is the correct spelling, spermicide and others.
and eww
eww? As in..
by Great Azarath » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:02 pm

by Alqania » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:04 pm

by Dizyntk » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:06 pm

by Great Azarath » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:07 pm
Dilange wrote:Great Azarath wrote:1- If they "prolly" know the risk then what exactly is your problem with it?
Its unnecessary.2- Eh, I sorta agree about the contract
Good. Now that we know its more a business than a bodily right....we can stop this entire draft now.3- No, your just as likely. They both are live beings.
False.
Prostitutes have more sexual partners than normal live beings. More likely.4- Dont remember what is being spoken of...
The problems where brothels aren't safer than just working alone.

by Great Azarath » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Dilange wrote:Great Azarath wrote:No where does it say it can be legalized specifically because it is ancient
But you mention it as it is important, no? If its not a reaosn it should be legalized then its not needed..I dont know this is the correct spelling, spermicide and others.
Spermicide doesnt protect from diseases.and eww
eww? As in..

by Great Azarath » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:10 pm

by Dizyntk » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:12 pm

by Dilange » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:12 pm
Great Azarath wrote:Dilange wrote:
Its unnecessary.
Good. Now that we know its more a business than a bodily right....we can stop this entire draft now.
False.
Prostitutes have more sexual partners than normal live beings. More likely.
The problems where brothels aren't safer than just working alone.
1- No it isnt,
2-Heh, nice try
3-True
4-Welp, I am debating like 5 people at one while you only have one...cant blame me

by Libraria and Ausitoria » Sun Aug 28, 2011 9:02 pm
Libraria and Ausitoria wrote:Also there might be the enormous loophole of taxing prostitution into non existence by giving the government 110% tax or something, although we're not sure of the legality of that principal? Anyway, if that loophole is legal, the proposal should plug the hole.
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]

by Dilange » Sun Aug 28, 2011 9:21 pm
Great Azarath wrote:Did you read the resolution? It says unwanted pregnancies as well
and eww as in, your a crusty old man....

by Speculine » Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:32 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Quebecshire, States of Glory WA Office, Witchcraft and Sorcery
Advertisement