by Silar » Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:43 am
by Enzo Turga » Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:48 am
by Silar » Sun Aug 16, 2009 9:58 am
by Rutianas » Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:09 am
Silar wrote:DRAFT #1
WA Resolution #10: Nuclear Arms Possession Act (Category: International Security; Strength: Mild), for reasons explained in below argument, shall be struck out null and void.
ARGUMENT: Nuclear weapons are extremely hazardous, not only to those attacked by them, but also towards those who produce them. This hazard is due to the following reasons:
1) Nuclear weapons produce a great amount of energy when detonated.
2) A detonation of a nuclear weapon produces deadly radioactive fall out which can cause cancer, usually killing any survivors of the initial explosion.
3) The production of nuclear weapons also creates radioactive waste that poses a hazard to both the environment and near by settlements.
4) Armed nuclear weapons are prone to detonate without warning producing effect described in 1 and 2.
5) Nuclear weapons provide nations with great power. Causing them to be feared by other nations, increasing international paranoia and damaging world security.
6) Nuclear arms provide nations owning them with the power to control nations without nuclear arms by way of fear.
CONCLUSION: For reasons said in above argument, the World Assembly(WA) hereby acknowledges the danger towards international security and any hope of world peace that WA Resolution #10 provides and strikes it out null and void.
by Silar » Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:06 am
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:46 am
by Travancore-Cochin » Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:52 am
Silar wrote:The WA's function is to promote peace
by Rutianas » Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:04 pm
Silar wrote:nuclear arms are not the answer. ya, rouge nations that aren't in the WA would have them, and might attack WA members, but that doesn't mean we should decrease are selves to such barbaric means as nuclear arms! The WA's function is to promote peace not to protect its members.
by Silar » Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:24 pm
by Flibbleites » Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:44 pm
Which is exactly the reason I wrote the NAPA and its predecessor. To ensure that WA members wouldn't be at a tactical disadvantage when dealing with non-members.Silar wrote:nuclear arms are not the answer. ya, rouge nations that aren't in the WA would have them, and might attack WA members,
by Tanaara » Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:00 pm
by Serbian_Soviet_Union » Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:04 pm
Silar wrote:DRAFT #1
WA Resolution #10: Nuclear Arms Possession Act (Category: International Security; Strength: Mild), for reasons explained in below argument, shall be struck out null and void.
ARGUMENT: Nuclear weapons are extremely hazardous, not only to those attacked by them, but also towards those who produce them. This hazard is due to the following reasons:
1) Nuclear weapons produce a great amount of energy when detonated.
2) A detonation of a nuclear weapon produces deadly radioactive fall out which can cause cancer, usually killing any survivors of the initial explosion.
3) The production of nuclear weapons also creates radioactive waste that poses a hazard to both the environment and near by settlements.
4) Armed nuclear weapons are prone to detonate without warning producing effect described in 1 and 2.
5) Nuclear weapons provide nations with great power. Causing them to be feared by other nations, increasing international paranoia and damaging world security.
6) Nuclear arms provide nations owning them with the power to control nations without nuclear arms by way of fear.
CONCLUSION: For reasons said in above argument, the World Assembly(WA) hereby acknowledges the danger towards international security and any hope of world peace that WA Resolution #10 provides and strikes it out null and void.
by Silar » Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:28 pm
by Tanaara » Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:57 pm
by Silar » Sun Aug 16, 2009 4:32 pm
by The Emmerian Unions » Sun Aug 16, 2009 5:06 pm
Ifreann wrote:"And in world news, the United States has recently elected Bill Gates as God Emperor For All Time. Foreign commentators believe that Gates' personal fortune may have played a role in his victory, but criticism from the United States of Gates(as it is now known) has been sparse and brief."
by Bears Armed » Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:22 am
Tanaara wrote:"You want to be a bunch of fluffy bunnies served up on the dinner table"
by Silar » Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:13 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Tachyonet
Advertisement