Ambassador Gliemann wiped a single tear running down her cheek,
" Mass Zombie Killing has been, I'm afraid already banned,
I think... *sob* "
"As such you might want to take familarize yourself with GA Resolution #38 :
Convention Against Genocide. Which inconveniently states in bold clear lettering for you...
1. (1) Genocide shall be defined as any act committed, or measure enacted, with the intent to destroy, in whole or partially, an identifiable group of persons on the basis of belief, ethnicity, nationality, culture, or a perceived innate characteristic, which for the purposes of this resolution shall include sexual orientation.
(2) Acts of genocide include, but are not limited to: killing or inflicting serious harm upon members of the group, creating living conditions for the group which tend to bring about its physical destruction, forcibly removing children from the group, or taking measures to prevent births within the group.
2. Member nations are prohibited from perpetrating acts of genocide, and must take action against non-state groups undertaking such activities whithin their borders.
The bolded part is your possible loophole. Is a zombie a person?
Or as its later states,
The final goal of action against genocide is to uphold the rights of sapient beings, and actions taken against genocide should be consistent with this higher goal.
Is a zombie a sapient being?
___________
Then there is the
Charter of Civil Rights which clearly states,
c ) All inhabitants of member states have the right not to be and indeed must not be discriminated against on grounds including sex, race, ethnicity, nationality, skin color, language, economic or cultural background, physical or mental disability or condition, religion or belief system, sexual orientation or sexual identity, or any other arbitrarily assigned and reductive categorisation which may be used for the purposes of discrimination, except for compelling practical purposes, such as hiring only female staff to work with battered women who have sought refuge from their abusers.
Is potential infection and cannibalism grounds for discrimination ? I don't know, in fact, thats a good point to bring up with its Author, particularly the potential infection part, which is actually a common source of discrimination and isolation in many cases. "