Proposal: repeal nuclear arms possesion act

[Separatist Peoples]

Take a good long look at #1.

I declare that I am legally permitted to kill you. Declarations are not automatically true.

Except that in this case, it is legal. According to a WA resolution. So in your analogy, if there is a law saying that you are legally allowed to kill me, then yes, that declaration is true.

[Linux and the X]

I declare that I am legally permitted to kill you. Declarations are not automatically true.

Except that in this case, it is legal. According to a WA resolution. So in your analogy, if there is a law saying that you are legally allowed to kill me, then yes, that declaration is true.

The resolution declares that there is no legislation against x. At present, this is true. The resolution does not declare that there can never be legislation against x. However, let us assume that the right of posession exists, as I did for the original list. Everything else is still fair game.

[Separatist Peoples]

Except that in this case, it is legal. According to a WA resolution. So in your analogy, if there is a law saying that you are legally allowed to kill me, then yes, that declaration is true.

The resolution declares that there is no legislation against x. At present, this is true. The resolution does not declare that there can never be legislation against x. However, let us assume that the right of posession exists, as I did for the original list. Everything else is still fair game.

We don't have a need to assume. Nations are legally allowed to possess and use nuclear weapons according to NAPA. What you would like to to is limit nations' abilities to respond to hostile enemies, especially those outside of the WA. I dont know what kind of fluffy fairyland your nation exists in, but the CDSP is greatly concerned with it's defensive capabilities in regards to our neighbors.