NATION

PASSWORD

[Draft] Freedom of the Press

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New Rockport
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 446
Founded: May 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby New Rockport » Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:45 am

It would seem to me that Resolution 30, "Freedom of Expression," already covers this. Resolution 30 states, in part,
Requires member states to respect and uphold this right in all available media to all individuals under their jurisdiction;
(emphasis added)
The press and broadcasters would seem to be included in "all available media." The entire resolution can be found here.

Respectfully submitted,
Raj Patel, Esq.
Deputy Counsel to the Ambassador
Republic of New Rockport
Last edited by New Rockport on Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Federal Republic of New Rockport


User avatar
Bergnovinaia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7314
Founded: Jul 26, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Bergnovinaia » Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:47 am

New Rockport wrote:It would seem to me that Resolution 30, "Freedom of Expression," already covers this. Resolution 30 states, in part,
Requires member states to respect and uphold this right in all available media to all individuals under their jurisdiction;
(emphasis added)
The press and braodcasters would seem to be included in "all available media." The entire resolution can be found here.

Respectfully submitted,
Raj Patel, Esq.
Deputy Counsel to the Ambassador
Republic of New Rockport


You could perhaps be right. However, i am not really sure that freedom of the press is the same as freedom of expression.
I am pursuing my undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University in Psychology and Spanish. My goal in life is to be a marriage and family counselor. If you have questions about me or my life, just ask!

My girlfriend and I blog about Christian & general marriage, relationship, and dating advice!

NS member since 2009. WA Resolution Author (mostly all repealed), NS sports fanatic.

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:57 am

Yes, GA #30 does cover many parts of the resolution but there has to be some way to make use of the Free Press category, honoured ambassador to New Rockport. Obviously GA #30 has made much of this draft redundant, regrettably, so it is far from ready.
Last edited by Charlotte Ryberg on Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bergnovinaia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7314
Founded: Jul 26, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Bergnovinaia » Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:07 pm

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Yes, GA #30 does cover many parts of the resolution but there has to be some way to make use of the Free Press category, honoured ambassador to New Rockport. Obviously GA #30 has made much of this draft redundant, regrettably, so it is far from ready.


Why would they even make a free press category if it shouldn't be used?????
I am pursuing my undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University in Psychology and Spanish. My goal in life is to be a marriage and family counselor. If you have questions about me or my life, just ask!

My girlfriend and I blog about Christian & general marriage, relationship, and dating advice!

NS member since 2009. WA Resolution Author (mostly all repealed), NS sports fanatic.

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:42 pm

Looking into the Jolt Archives, the category was created in March 2006, well before the changeover to the WA.

User avatar
Grays Harbor
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Grays Harbor » Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:54 pm

My government would support the ammended version of this proposal as put forth.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
New Rockport
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 446
Founded: May 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby New Rockport » Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:03 pm

I think I might have found a way to make this so that it doesn't overlap Resolution 30. Resolution 30 recognizes the right of individuals to free expression, but does not mention a right of organizations to free expression. Therefore, a resolution that recognizes the press freedom of organizations would appear to be legal because it would not duplicate Resolution 30.

Respectfully submitted,
Raj Patel, Esq.
Deputy Counsel to the Ambassador
Republic of New Rockport
The Federal Republic of New Rockport


User avatar
Bergnovinaia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7314
Founded: Jul 26, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Bergnovinaia » Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:05 pm

New Rockport wrote:I think I might have found a way to make this so that it doesn't overlap Resolution 30. Resolution 30 recognizes the right of individuals to free expression, but does not mention a right of organizations to free expression. Therefore, a resolution that recognizes the press freedom of organizations would appear to be legal because it would not duplicate Resolution 30.

Respectfully submitted,
Raj Patel, Esq.
Deputy Counsel to the Ambassador
Republic of New Rockport


Your right. So perhaps adding a clause saying something like, "The government hearby does not restrict the voices of any press organization," could potentially make it legal.
I am pursuing my undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University in Psychology and Spanish. My goal in life is to be a marriage and family counselor. If you have questions about me or my life, just ask!

My girlfriend and I blog about Christian & general marriage, relationship, and dating advice!

NS member since 2009. WA Resolution Author (mostly all repealed), NS sports fanatic.

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:12 pm

Since I cannot find a reliable pivotal place to edit and display my current version of the draft I am forced to post it here:

Freedom of Media Organizations
A resolution to promote funding and the development of education and the arts.

Category: Education and Creativity | Area of Effect: Free Press | Proposed by: Charlotte Ryberg

Description:The World Assembly,

• Recognising the rights of media organizations to express their opinion on genuine issues and affairs of the world without fear of repression;
• Seeking to protect the above rights while keeping in mind of the need to protect moral decency;

Hereby,

1. Mandates that:
a) All media organisations in member states have the unalienable right to express their opinion on genuine issues and affairs of the world without fear of repression;
b) Member states must not censor content created by the media organizations any further than the exceptions given in Section 2 and 3.

2. Allows member states to restrict media organizations from publishing, without seeking advice, information that has the potential to:
a) Compromise military and intelligence operations and methods;
b) Put the safety of those involved in such operations at risk;
c) Cause attacks that would damage the critical infrastructure and/or endanger lives.
d) Reveal personal information or invade the privacy of an individual without consent.

3. Provides for member states to regulate the following types of content published by media organizations in the interests of moral decency:
a) Explicit, obscene or adult content (but not to ban them unless it is used unlawfully);
b) Genuinely libellous information about individuals;
c) Content which incites fraud, criminal activities, racial or social hatred;
d) Content which tries to hypnotise the audience into doing certain actions;
e) Content which plagiarises original content or violates applicable copyright laws.

Co-authored by Bergnovinaia.
Last edited by Charlotte Ryberg on Tue Aug 11, 2009 7:43 am, edited 11 times in total.

User avatar
Bergnovinaia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7314
Founded: Jul 26, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Bergnovinaia » Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:14 pm

you mispelled organizations (I spelled it right so just copy it). I think were ready to submit if you are.
I am pursuing my undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University in Psychology and Spanish. My goal in life is to be a marriage and family counselor. If you have questions about me or my life, just ask!

My girlfriend and I blog about Christian & general marriage, relationship, and dating advice!

NS member since 2009. WA Resolution Author (mostly all repealed), NS sports fanatic.

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:29 pm

Ready to submit? That was quick, honoured ambassador. :roll:

I don't think we've spent enough time waiting for the opinions and feedback of other experienced resolution writers. It is worth waiting for further feedback from other experienced resolution writers so the quality of the draft increases.
Last edited by Charlotte Ryberg on Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bergnovinaia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7314
Founded: Jul 26, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Bergnovinaia » Fri Aug 07, 2009 1:31 pm

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Ready to submit? That was quick, honoured ambassador. :roll:

I don't think we've spent enough time waiting for the opinions and feedback of other experienced resolution writers. It is worth waiting for further feedback from other experienced resolution writers so the quality of the draft increases.


yeah that's true. Sorry about that i had this confused with another thread.
I am pursuing my undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University in Psychology and Spanish. My goal in life is to be a marriage and family counselor. If you have questions about me or my life, just ask!

My girlfriend and I blog about Christian & general marriage, relationship, and dating advice!

NS member since 2009. WA Resolution Author (mostly all repealed), NS sports fanatic.

User avatar
Rolovaria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Jul 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Rolovaria » Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:23 pm

Very nice proposal honored ambassador.

I look forward to seeing if there are any further changes to the draft. I support this piece of legislation and once submitted you can count on my endorsement.
Rhyolith Kortala
Archduke of the Grand Duchy of Rolovaria
WA Delegate of the region of Xziviria

User avatar
Unfreedomia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Jul 04, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Unfreedomia » Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:04 pm

what if the media through their expression of information could cause an event to take place that would not be in the best interests of the people. So under this
Act the media could potentionally cause anarchy through releasing some information. Say for example there was a virus which would kill approx 10% of the population. By releasing this information to the public it causes mass anarchy and the government lose control so people emigrate to other countries and spread the virus further this killing even more people than was predicted.

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:14 pm

Unfreedomia wrote:what if the media through their expression of information could cause an event to take place that would not be in the best interests of the people. So under this
Act the media could potentionally cause anarchy through releasing some information. Say for example there was a virus which would kill approx 10% of the population. By releasing this information to the public it causes mass anarchy and the government lose control so people emigrate to other countries and spread the virus further this killing even more people than was predicted.

This would come under the existing Epidemic Response Act and the future version of a Convention on Emigration

User avatar
Meekinos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 776
Founded: Sep 10, 2004
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Meekinos » Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:27 pm

Anti-social behaviour is too broad. Could the definition be narrowed to illegal behaviour? It would give the nation the liberty it needs but it would be reliant on laws and not just the whims of the population.
Ambassador Gavriil Floros
Meekinos' Official WA Ambassador
Deputy Treasurer, North Pleides Merchant's Syndicate
CEO & Financial Manager of Delta Energy Ltd.
Madame Elina Nikodemos
Executive Senior Delegate
Educator
The Hellenic Republic of Meekinos
Factbook: Your Friendly Guide to Meekinos
The paranoid, isolationist, xenophobic capitalists.

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:34 pm

Refined at section 3c:

3. Further specifies that member states may only regulate the following content of press organizations to preserve moral decency:
c) Content that promotes criminal activities and/or racial/social hatred.

User avatar
New Rockport
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 446
Founded: May 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby New Rockport » Sat Aug 08, 2009 2:01 pm

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:1. Mandates fundamentally that:
a) All press organisations and their journalists in member states have the unalienable right to express and voice their opinion on all issues and affairs of member states and the world without the fear of repression by the government of the member state.
b) Member states are prohibited from disseminating information made by press organizations any further than the exceptions as specified in Section 2 and 3.

I would recommend striking "and their journalists" from Section 1(a). Journalists are individuals and are therefore protected by Resolution 30. Additionally, press freedom does not just protect journalism, but also other publications including art, music, advocacy, academic writing, fiction, poetry, and advertising.

Also, disseminating is not quite the right word in Section 1(b). I recommend replacing it with censoring.

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:3. Further specifies that member states may only regulate the following content of press organizations to preserve moral decency:
a) Explicit or adult content, but not completely outlaw it unless used criminally;
b) Genuinely libellous information about ordinary people or celebrities;
c) Content that promotes criminal activities and/or racial/social hatred;
d) Content that attempts to hypnotise a viewer into doing certain actions.

Section 3 probably should also include exceptions for fraud, plagiarism, and copyright and trademark infringement.

Raj Patel, Esq.
Chief Counsel to the Ambassador
The Federal Republic of New Rockport


User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Aug 09, 2009 4:20 am

New Rockport wrote:I would recommend striking "and their journalists" from Section 1(a). Journalists are individuals and are therefore protected by Resolution 30. Additionally, press freedom does not just protect journalism, but also other publications including art, music, advocacy, academic writing, fiction, poetry, and advertising.

Expanded to cover media organizations instead of just press organizations. It is worth noting that the Free press category mainly covers media organizations.

New Rockport wrote:Also, disseminating is not quite the right word in Section 1(b). I recommend replacing it with censoring.

Got that, honoured ambassador.

New Rockport wrote:Section 3 probably should also include exceptions for fraud, plagiarism, and copyright and trademark infringement.

Refined to read:

3. Further specifies that member states may only regulate the following content of press organizations to preserve moral decency:
a) Explicit or adult content, but not completely outlaw it unless used criminally;
b) Genuinely libellous information about ordinary people or celebrities;
c) Content that promotes or causes fraud, criminal activities and/or racial/social hatred;
d) Content that attempts to hypnotise a viewer into doing certain actions;
e) Content that plagiarises original content or violates national and transnational copyright laws.

See revised version.

User avatar
Grays Harbor
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 18566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Grays Harbor » Sun Aug 09, 2009 7:21 am

We can support this proposal as it currently stands.
Everything you know about me is wrong. Or a rumor. Something like that.

Not Ta'veren

User avatar
Koumpounophobia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 477
Founded: Aug 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Koumpounophobia » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:26 pm

I could easily vote for this to pass. Now to just get it through the trial-by-fire and to the passing point.
Koumpounaphobian President: Veronica Pelt
Koumpounaphobian CEO (vice president): N/A
Koumpounaphobian Negotiator: Marcus Brenner
Koumpounaphobian Battle Advisor: Kyle Tuttle
Koumpounophobian Head of Public Relations: Dan Carlnet

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:40 am

Currently, I am proof-reading the collaborated version to check for potential conflicts with past resolutions (especially GA #30) and I would appreciate the honoured ambassador to update the OP with the collaborated version if they see fit to do so.

However, I am already seeing that the issue of privacy is missing. I might try (under section 2):

2. Allows member states to restrict media organizations from publishing, without seeking advice, information that has the potential to... disclose confidential personal information or invade the privacy of an individual without consent.

User avatar
Bergnovinaia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7314
Founded: Jul 26, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Bergnovinaia » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:43 am

Charlotte Ryberg wrote:Currently, I am proof-reading the collaborated version to check for potential conflicts with past resolutions (especially GA #30) and I would appreciate the honoured ambassador to update the OP with the collaborated version if they see fit to do so.

However, I am already seeing that the issue of privacy is missing. I might try (under section 2):

2. Allows member states to restrict media organizations from publishing, without seeking advice, information that has the potential to... disclose confidential personal information or invade the privacy of an individual without consent.


OK i did it.
I am pursuing my undergraduate degree from Texas A&M University in Psychology and Spanish. My goal in life is to be a marriage and family counselor. If you have questions about me or my life, just ask!

My girlfriend and I blog about Christian & general marriage, relationship, and dating advice!

NS member since 2009. WA Resolution Author (mostly all repealed), NS sports fanatic.

User avatar
Charlotte Ryberg
The Muse of the Westcountry
 
Posts: 15007
Founded: Mar 14, 2007
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:11 pm

Further revisions have been made to this post to take into account of the right to privacy and clearing up of the English, although it will need to be triple-checked to ensure it does not overlap with Greenlandic People's Right to Privacy proposal, knowing that it may pass. As I said it is covering organizational press freedom, which now appears to be compatible with GA #30.

User avatar
Anarchifia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Aug 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: [Draft] Freedom of the Press

Postby Anarchifia » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:47 pm

Even though I am against coporations "Destroying" My nation, I beilieve they have every right to report what they want instead of censoring what the goverment would say was "Lowering moral". However, The fact that The republic of anarchifia dissaproves of news reporters I suport your values and idealology. :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :bow:
The republic of Anarchifia:
President: Adam sanchez
Vice-President: David wurbrington
Secretary: muhammed dilaviv
General(s): olah vilah [Dead], sam balloki.
Millatary
Troops: 20 thousand
Reserves: 10 thousand
Aircraft: 10 thousand
Pilots: 11 thousand
Tanks/Ground veichles: 15 thousand
Ships: 12 thousand

Wars:
Current:
None
Past:
NazioniaVSPeacifia=Won

RussenichVSGerakstan=Won
Country alert:LowIgnored threatNeutral threatWarHigh alertInevtible exterminationDestroyed/Surrender

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: West Barack and East Obama

Advertisement

Remove ads