Heavens Reach wrote:Gibbzarj wrote:This whole argument seems to be "this is bad because it's bad". If you do not have any meat to your stance, you aren't debating, you are just arguing.
Do you mean why is slavery bad? It violates rights, like freedom of movement, and freedom from forced labor. You can, abstractly, ask why we consider those to be rights or why we should subscribe to a rights-based ethics in policymaking but, suffice it to say that, per the vote, there is an overwhelming consensus on their importance and applicability.
Writing a document that declares people have the right to something doesn't make it mean anything; this is just a case of imposing an agenda on nations who do not comply with it.











