NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Surrender & Prisoner Act

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Monoceria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Sep 03, 2026
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

[DRAFT] Surrender & Prisoner Act

Postby Monoceria » Wed Sep 16, 2026 10:21 pm

Surrender & Prisoner Act
The World Assembly,

Noting the lack of more thorough, polished laws about humanitarian laws and their specific focuses,

Believing the idea of leaving combatants unprotected due to possible loopholes and less attention is cruel and regretful,

Seeking the amendment of the laws protecting prisoners of war and surrenderors in combat, giving an option for mercy in a scorched landscape,

Defines as follows:

1. A prisoner of war (PoW) is a captive under the protection of a belligerent nation or other organization of recognition for being a part of the warfare, due to either voluntary surrender or capture while being unable to agree to captivity. They are considered non-combatants, and are protected from classification as a military asset or target.

a. They may be used as a bargaining asset. In which case, they shall be, if the exchange is confirmed, be returned to friendly soil, seacraft, or any other land belonging to their or an ally’s territory, suitable for the person’s physical conditions, species, and needs for life. For which it would be classified as illegal includes, but is not limited to leaving a being requiring solid ground and oxygen in an area with a lack of even one of the needs.


2. A surrenderor is a person who is showing an internationally recognized sign of parley or surrender, or verbal acknowledgement at a reasonable distance, for the purpose of, including but not limited to, reducing casualties in their organization, surrendering on their behalf, for themselves, escape from certain cruel conditions, and imminent danger. They are unarmed and are considered non-combatants. Certain conditions may apply.


a. In the case of the opposing side being unable to understand or see the surrender due to conditions out of their control, the surrenderor cannot be legally protected. If they are killed attempting to surrender with the opposers having no possibility to see, it is not illegal.

b. A surrenderor may not try to evade capture. The moment they plead for surrender, they don’t hold allegiance to any military and are no longer in combat.
i. This is nullified only in the case of where going through with surrender poses an immediate risk to the surrenderor, receiver, or both, including but not limited to newly discovered landmines, crossfire, or one who is not following the protective laws and is attempting to neutralize the surrenderor, receiver, or both.

c. A surrenderor who attempts to attack at any point is a war criminal, and no longer protected.

Hereby establishes as follows:


1. A new international sign of parley and surrender is established, with member nations being required to agree to the recognition of its existence and required to educate soldiers on applicable conditions for it.


2. Militaries of member nations will be required to accept all surrenderors and cease fire at the sight of the sign.


3. PoW camps will be highly regulated in member nations, with all nations in active combat concerning the physical action of persons within combat zones, being required to have at least one PoW camp with the capacity of at least one hundred prisoners. These must include:

a. Adequate nutrition.

b. Not physically detrimental tasks.

c. Freedom to participate in jobs with choice not to, with compensation of at least a fair
corresponding pay per day.

d. No physical or mental torture.

e. Medical care.

f. No punishment of prisoners without prior permission from an international tribunal.
i. Violation or lack of providing for any of the above will result in disqualification of the PoW camp and will result in all PoWs either moved to another camp or be returned to their own territory.
ii. If the above is violated and not followed with cooperation of the transfer of PoWs, the leadership and others who authorized the action will be held on trial by an international tribunal.
Last edited by Monoceria on Wed Sep 16, 2026 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kshemarashtram
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Mar 30, 2026
Autocratic Socialists

Postby Kshemarashtram » Wed Sep 16, 2026 11:12 pm

A fresh start! I see you have titled it properly and formatted it well, so good job on that!

However, I once again draw your attention to my comments on your previous thread, regarding your first preambulatory clause:
Kshemarashtram wrote: It would be wrong to say there are no humanitarian laws in the Assembly, given the existence of GA#4 (Eliminating Slavery and Trafficking of Persons), GA#6 (International War Crimes Convention), GA#12 (Against Torture), GA#13 (No Punishment Without Prior Law).

Kshemarashtram wrote:Thirdly, your first preambulatory clause ("lack of more thorough, polished laws about humanitarian...")... that's just not true, man. There are quite a few humanitarian laws already on the books, as I said in a previous comment, and there might be a few more by the time this draft is ready (if it does turn out to be ready). Even though they haven't been about PoWs specifically, they are still thorough and polished humanitarian laws with specific focuses (slavery, war crimes, torture etc.). Either edit it to something else, or remove that clause entirely.

Could you address that? If you disagree, what's your reason?
Note: This nation is not socialist. Read about this misleading nation classification.
AtaHana wrote:Adults are just kids who think they've grown up
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Call the doctor - sense of humour transplant required.

User avatar
Bonderovia
Secretary
 
Posts: 33
Founded: Aug 30, 2026
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Bonderovia » Thu Sep 17, 2026 1:46 am

Good restart as a beginner. I see no errors so far. But my 2nd question remains in previous thread.

User avatar
Monoceria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Sep 03, 2026
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Monoceria » Thu Sep 17, 2026 11:03 pm

I will edit

User avatar
Meraud
Envoy
 
Posts: 247
Founded: Feb 21, 2024
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Meraud » Fri Sep 18, 2026 9:01 am

IC: The Chief Ambassador of Meraud, Nereida A. Pacífica, enters the General Assembly's conference room dedicated towards the drafting of the 'Surrender & Prisoner Act'.
"Greetings, I look forward to working with you." She takes a seat at the meeting table, brushing her aquamarine hair to the side.

Green = Support | Red = Rejection | Blue = Modification
Surrender & Prisoner Act
The World Assembly,

Noting the lack of more thorough, polished laws about humanitarian laws and their specific focuses,

Believing the idea of leaving combatants unprotected due to possible loopholes and less attention is cruel and regretful,

Seeking the amendment of the laws protecting prisoners of war and surrenderors in combat, giving an option for mercy in a scorched landscape,

Defines as follows:

1. A prisoner of war (PoW) is a captive under the protection of a belligerent nation or other organization of recognition for being a part of the warfare, due to either voluntary surrender or capture while being unable to agree to captivity. They are considered non-combatants, and are protected from classification as a military asset or target.

a. They may be used as a bargaining asset. In which case, they shall be, if the exchange is confirmed, be returned to friendly soil, seacraft, or any other land belonging to their or an ally’s territory, suitable for the person’s physical conditions, species, and needs for life. For which it would be classified as illegal includes, but is not limited to leaving a being requiring solid ground and oxygen in an area with a lack of even one of the needs.

2. A surrenderor is a person who is showing an internationally recognized sign of parley or surrender, or verbal acknowledgement at a reasonable distance, for the purpose of, including but not limited to, reducing casualties in their organization, surrendering on their behalf, for themselves, escape from certain cruel conditions, and imminent danger. They are unarmed and are considered non-combatants. Certain conditions may apply.

a. In the case of the opposing side being unable to understand or see the surrender due to conditions out of their control, the surrenderor cannot be legally protected. If they are killed attempting to surrender with the opposers having no possibility to see, it is not illegal.

b. A surrenderor may not try to evade capture. The moment they plead for surrender, they don’t hold allegiance to any military and are no longer in combat.
i. This is nullified only in the case of where going through with surrender poses an immediate risk to the surrenderor, receiver, or both, including but not limited to newly discovered landmines, crossfire, or one who is not following the protective laws and is attempting to neutralize the surrenderor, receiver, or both.

c. A surrenderor who attempts to attack at any point is a war criminal, and no longer protected.

Hereby establishes as follows:

1. A new international sign of parley and surrender is established, with member nations being required to agree to the recognition of its existence and required to educate soldiers on applicable conditions for it.

2. Militaries of member nations will be required to accept all surrenderors and cease fire at the sight of the sign.

3. PoW camps will be highly regulated in member nations, with all nations in active combat concerning the physical action of persons within combat zones, being required to have at least one PoW camp with the capacity of at least one hundred prisoners. These must include:

a. Adequate nutrition.

b. Not physically detrimental tasks.

c. Freedom to participate in jobs with choice not to, with compensation of at least a fair
corresponding pay per day.

Meraud provides PoW adequate food and shelter as compensation for their labor. PoW that successfully assist Meraudian forces against their own homeland receive more bountiful rewards. This follows the teachings of Sun Tzu.

d. No physical or mental torture.
Modify to only include prevention of physical torture. Meraudian law rejects the existence of mental torture. Note that Meraud has not adopted GA #12 due to its inclusion of "mental" torture.

e. Medical care.


f. No punishment of prisoners without prior permission from an international tribunal.
i. Violation or lack of providing for any of the above will result in disqualification of the PoW camp and will result in all PoWs either moved to another camp or be returned to their own territory.
ii. If the above is violated and not followed with cooperation of the transfer of PoWs, the leadership and others who authorized the action will be held on trial by an international tribunal.
Meraud rejects requiring permission from foreign entities to punish prisoners as deemed necessary. Imagine if the prisoners tried to escape and the tribunal has an ally of the PoW homeland.

"Overall Meraud supports this attempt at providing standardizations for surrender and PoW classifications. The clauses I have rejected or requested modification for would prevent the Meraudian Submariner Corps from conducting their mission."
She rises from her chair and briskly glides out of the room.
Meraud is a fictional underwater nation set 20 years into the future which is a utopia (or dystopia depending on your worldview).

Factbooks of Interest: Faces of Meraud |Wiki-Style Article | Government Structure | Leader Profile | 6Foundations | 8D-PolComp | 8dreams | 8values | 9Axes | Ideosorter | Prism Political Quiz

In real life, I am a 13th generation American non-denominational Christian civil engineer burdened with glorious purpose.

Take this high quality meme as a reward for reading this far. ;)

User avatar
Untecna
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11687
Founded: Jun 02, 2020
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Untecna » Fri Sep 18, 2026 10:54 am

I'll probably come back in later in the day with better feedback, but I want to address this section of the preamble:

Noting the lack of more thorough, polished laws about humanitarian laws and their specific focuses,


This is false. Like, full stop. There are certainly areas which have not yet been covered, POWs being a good example, but this section of the preamble needlessly antagonizes based on a false premise. I would suggest axing it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Untecna ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Starizon's Resident Lizard ~ Minister, Gameside ~ Deputy Minister, Culture
3x LGA ~ 1x GA2 ~ 1x Issues
Always lizardbrained, aren't I?

User avatar
Haguia
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 10
Founded: Nov 12, 2023
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Haguia » Fri Sep 18, 2026 11:54 am

Monoceria, nations of the Assembly, and interested parties,

The resolution appears to be in line with the more humanitarian principles that the Assembly has been adopting.
First, I believe the term “protection” in the following item:

“1. A prisoner of war (PoW) is a captive under the protection of a belligerent nation...”

is incorrect; a PoW is not and will never be under protection—he is in custody. I believe that the vast majority of nations in the world consider their prisoners to be in custody, not under protection, and I think the same should apply in this case.

Second, in item 2c:

“c. A surrenderor who attempts to attack at any point is a war criminal and is no longer protected.”

I think it’s important—to avoid a gray area—to specify, perhaps in a subitem or item d, that a POW who commits a crime while in custody must be prosecuted by the appropriate authorities of the country holding them in custody.
For example, if a POW is caught in their cell with contraband, they must be punished according to the law of the country where they are held, thereby ceasing to be a POW.

Third, I believe it would also be worthwhile to add a clause at the end stating that POW camps, with the authorization of all parties involved, may be inspected by the WA.

Another point: Item ii aligns with another pending resolution that establishes an international court, so you might be able to gain support for it. The draft is on the forum.

Finally, I believe the resolution is important and has a solid foundation. However, I strongly believe you should make the proposed changes.
For now, if the resolution is put to a vote without the above changes being reviewed, Haguia will vote against it.


Imperial Office of the Secretary of Foreign Affairs
Long Live the Emperor!

User avatar
Zetaopalatopia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 681
Founded: Aug 19, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Zetaopalatopia » Fri Sep 18, 2026 3:38 pm

Nations should have the right to refuse surrender in times of war. A requirement to accept surrender will only make the goal to be to eliminate hostile combatants faster than they can surrender. Which has the effect of increasing collateral.
What's this signature thing do?
Unofficial warnings: 1
Personal moto(s):
Always do your best to push the line, but never cross it if you aren't ready for what comes next.
- Myself
The result justifies the deed. (Exitus acta probat)
- Ovid

Mad, adj. Affected with a high degree of intellectual independence.
-Ambrose Bierce

User avatar
The Crusader Kings
Diplomat
 
Posts: 533
Founded: Nov 21, 2025
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The Crusader Kings » Sat Sep 19, 2026 8:33 pm

"polished laws about humanitarian laws"... A: Humanitarian? Forgetting Non-Humans?

"They are considered non-combatants, and are protected from classification as a military asset or target." And if say POW knows dangerous info? I can't put them out of their misery?

"2. Militaries of member nations will be required to accept all surrenderors and cease fire at the sight of the sign." And how exactly are my soldiers meant to know if the enemy is faking? Or holding a bomb?

"i. Violation or lack of providing for any of the above will result in disqualification of the PoW camp and will result in all PoWs either moved to another camp or be returned to their own territory." Ah yes. If my camp has a a single clogged toilet that, for a single second, makes living conditions unfavorable, you're going to return all those troops to my enemy? Brilliant.
Monoceria wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=588275

New law, decided to make a new forum because it would be confusing as the title now has no relation

You can edit the Title you know.

I'm AGAINST due to the Author making a 2nd thread, and for the above

Good day(or night) to you all.
Last edited by The Crusader Kings on Sat Sep 19, 2026 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Crusader Kings My NS stats/Policies DO NOT represent my IRL views
The truth must be held by the sword. There is no place for heretics. God wills it. We chill for the most part.
God helps us, for we are not without error, but without grave sin. God wills our victory and glory, and let it be. Praise the Lord.
Glory to TCK.


User avatar
Kshemarashtram
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Mar 30, 2026
Autocratic Socialists

Postby Kshemarashtram » Sat Sep 19, 2026 8:53 pm

The Crusader Kings wrote:"
I'm AGAINST due to the Author making a 2nd thread, and for the above

I would say a new thread is indeed preferrable for this, since this is a new topic and new proposal entirely, albeit tangentially related. The previous one was about war crimes, this one's about PoWs, so the whole rest of the discussion on the other thread wouldn't be relevant to this new proposal.

Your other objections are valid though.
Note: This nation is not socialist. Read about this misleading nation classification.
AtaHana wrote:Adults are just kids who think they've grown up
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Call the doctor - sense of humour transplant required.

User avatar
Lipizia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 650
Founded: May 01, 2026
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Lipizia » Sun Sep 20, 2026 6:26 am

Please use the tag
Code: Select all
[list=][/list]
instead of all your 123, abc, i ii iii. It does thes same thing and makes te proposal more clear.
I make an example:
Code: Select all
[list=1][/list]
[*]Hi
[*]I
[*]Am
[*]Lipizia
[/list]

Becomes:
  1. Hi
  2. I
  3. Am
  4. Lipizia

If you want the letters or the iiis, use
Code: Select all
[list=a]

For letters, instead
Code: Select all
[list=i]

For the iiis.
Anyway, fixed the technical, I'm against. Clause 3 makes me trest prisoners of war Better of the average Lipiziense.

User avatar
Monoceria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Sep 03, 2026
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Refinition AGain

Postby Monoceria » Sun Sep 20, 2026 8:53 pm

Surrender & Prisoner Act
The World Assembly,

Believing the idea of leaving combatants unprotected due to possible loopholes and less attention is cruel and regretful,

Seeking the amendment of the laws protecting prisoners of war and surrenderors in combat, giving an option for mercy in a scorched landscape,

Defines as follows:

1. A prisoner of war (PoW) is a captive under the custody of a belligerent nation or other organization of recognition for being a part of the warfare, due to either voluntary surrender or capture while being unable to agree to captivity. They are considered non-combatants, and are protected from classification as a military asset or target.

a. They may be used as a bargaining asset. In which case, they shall be, if the exchange is confirmed, be returned to friendly soil, seacraft, or any other land belonging to their or an ally’s territory, suitable for the person’s physical conditions, species, and needs for life. For which it would be classified as illegal includes, but is not limited to leaving a being requiring solid ground and oxygen in an area with a lack of even one of the needs.


2. A surrenderor is a person who is showing an internationally recognized sign of parley or surrender, or verbal acknowledgement at a reasonable distance, for the purpose of, including but not limited to, reducing casualties in their organization, surrendering on their behalf, for themselves, escape from certain cruel conditions, and imminent danger. They are unarmed and are considered non-combatants. Certain conditions may apply.

a. In the case of the opposing side being unable to understand or see the surrender due to conditions out of their control, the surrenderor cannot be legally protected. If they are killed attempting to surrender with the opposers having no possibility to see, it is not illegal.

b. A surrenderor may not try to evade capture. The moment they plead for surrender, they don’t hold allegiance to any military and are no longer in combat.
i. This is nullified only in the case of where going through with surrender poses an immediate risk to the surrenderor, receiver, or both, including but not limited to newly discovered landmines, crossfire, or one who is not following the protective laws and is attempting to neutralize the surrenderor, receiver, or both.

c. A surrenderor who attempts to attack, escape, or commit other crimes that would be illegal for a prisoner by the capturing nation’s laws, they are able to be prosecuted by the capturing nation.

Hereby establishes as follows:


1. A new international sign of parley and surrender is established, with member nations being required to agree to the recognition of its existence and required to educate soldiers on applicable conditions for it.


2. Militaries of member nations will be required to accept all surrenderors and cease fire at the sight of the sign.

a. If the organization who is receiving the surrender has probable cause and reason to have suspicions of a false surrender, which includes but is not limited to frequent suicide bombings through false surrender by the enemy, they may reject the surrender.


3. PoW camps will be highly regulated in member nations, and, with consent between all parties being inspected regularly, with all nations in active combat concerning the physical action of persons within combat zones, being required to have at least one PoW camp with the capacity of at least one hundred prisoners. These must include:

a. Adequate nutrition.

b. Not physically detrimental tasks.

c. No physical torture.

d. Medical care.
i. Violation or lack of providing for any of the above for prolonged periods of more than a week will result in disqualification of the PoW camp and will result in all PoWs either moved to another camp or be returned to their own territory.
ii. If the above is violated and not followed with cooperation of the transfer of PoWs, the leadership and others who authorized the action will be held on trial by an international tribunal.



I'll try to apply the format soon.

User avatar
Kshemarashtram
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 439
Founded: Mar 30, 2026
Autocratic Socialists

Postby Kshemarashtram » Mon Sep 21, 2026 7:02 am

Monoceria, please put the latest draft in the first post of your thread by means of editing, so that people can view it instantly upon clicking the thread. Would be a jolly! :)
Note: This nation is not socialist. Read about this misleading nation classification.
AtaHana wrote:Adults are just kids who think they've grown up
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Call the doctor - sense of humour transplant required.

User avatar
Lipizia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 650
Founded: May 01, 2026
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Lipizia » Mon Sep 21, 2026 7:06 am

Monoceria wrote:I'll try to apply the format soon.

Ok! I'm always glad to teach to people BBCode I don't know why :p

User avatar
Haguia
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 10
Founded: Nov 12, 2023
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Haguia » Mon Sep 21, 2026 2:23 pm

Monoceria wrote:Surrender & Prisoner Act
The World Assembly,

Believing the idea of leaving combatants unprotected due to possible loopholes and less attention is cruel and regretful,

Seeking the amendment of the laws protecting prisoners of war and surrenderors in combat, giving an option for mercy in a scorched landscape,

Defines as follows:

1. A prisoner of war (PoW) is a captive under the custody of a belligerent nation or other organization of recognition for being a part of the warfare, due to either voluntary surrender or capture while being unable to agree to captivity. They are considered non-combatants, and are protected from classification as a military asset or target.

a. They may be used as a bargaining asset. In which case, they shall be, if the exchange is confirmed, be returned to friendly soil, seacraft, or any other land belonging to their or an ally’s territory, suitable for the person’s physical conditions, species, and needs for life. For which it would be classified as illegal includes, but is not limited to leaving a being requiring solid ground and oxygen in an area with a lack of even one of the needs.


2. A surrenderor is a person who is showing an internationally recognized sign of parley or surrender, or verbal acknowledgement at a reasonable distance, for the purpose of, including but not limited to, reducing casualties in their organization, surrendering on their behalf, for themselves, escape from certain cruel conditions, and imminent danger. They are unarmed and are considered non-combatants. Certain conditions may apply.

a. In the case of the opposing side being unable to understand or see the surrender due to conditions out of their control, the surrenderor cannot be legally protected. If they are killed attempting to surrender with the opposers having no possibility to see, it is not illegal.

b. A surrenderor may not try to evade capture. The moment they plead for surrender, they don’t hold allegiance to any military and are no longer in combat.
i. This is nullified only in the case of where going through with surrender poses an immediate risk to the surrenderor, receiver, or both, including but not limited to newly discovered landmines, crossfire, or one who is not following the protective laws and is attempting to neutralize the surrenderor, receiver, or both.

c. A surrenderor who attempts to attack, escape, or commit other crimes that would be illegal for a prisoner by the capturing nation’s laws, they are able to be prosecuted by the capturing nation.

Hereby establishes as follows:


1. A new international sign of parley and surrender is established, with member nations being required to agree to the recognition of its existence and required to educate soldiers on applicable conditions for it.


2. Militaries of member nations will be required to accept all surrenderors and cease fire at the sight of the sign.

a. If the organization who is receiving the surrender has probable cause and reason to have suspicions of a false surrender, which includes but is not limited to frequent suicide bombings through false surrender by the enemy, they may reject the surrender.


3. PoW camps will be highly regulated in member nations, and, with consent between all parties being inspected regularly, with all nations in active combat concerning the physical action of persons within combat zones, being required to have at least one PoW camp with the capacity of at least one hundred prisoners. These must include:

a. Adequate nutrition.

b. Not physically detrimental tasks.

c. No physical torture.

d. Medical care.
i. Violation or lack of providing for any of the above for prolonged periods of more than a week will result in disqualification of the PoW camp and will result in all PoWs either moved to another camp or be returned to their own territory.
ii. If the above is violated and not followed with cooperation of the transfer of PoWs, the leadership and others who authorized the action will be held on trial by an international tribunal.



I'll try to apply the format soon.


Monoceria, nations of the Assembly, and interested parties,

Thank you for taking my comments into account. I intend to review the proposal again to come up with some additional suggestions; for now, I recommend that this resolution remain in draft form.

Imperial Office of the Secretary of Foreign Affairs
Long Live the Emperor!


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads