Excidium Planetis wrote:I'll stop parodying your argument here and just say this is Bullshit. Point me to any repeal where a player purposefully added in Category and Strength to a repeal. I don't even think that is legal. (Is it? Can one repeal a resolution for being the wrong Category or the wrong Strength?)
Only repeals create game generated text in the body of the proposal. You know that I'm not talking about category and strength because I already told you in discord that I wasn't. All repeals have a single line that reads "[so and so resolution] shall be struck out and rendered null and void." That's enough for me.
Lastly, if the Operative Clause rule is not necessary and indeed useless as you have said so many times, why is it still a rule? Why did you not remove the operative clause rule?
I don't believe the operative clause rule is useless and in fact, my argument is the exact opposite. I am arguing that the text generated by the repeal qualifies as an operative clause and thus satisfies the operative clause rule as it is written. That is why GenSec initially framed this as a change in interpretation and not a change in the rules.
This borders on malicious quote editing. Clearly I said after that:
I'm getting really sick of this from you and Wallie. Report me if you think I broke a rule, don't accuse me.