Bears Armed wrote:OOC: Personally, I've thought for a long time that those of the rules that can be read IC should be considered to exist IC, and that reference to those rules should therefore be legal. That hasn't been how the Mods interpreted the situation, but maybe now that responsibility for such matters is being passed to GenSec it might -- if the GA community also supports this -- be possible to make a change?
I agree with the general idea. Rules that can be seen as IC should be able to be discussed ICly, including, possibly, mentioning such rules in resolutions. The problem, of course, is: What rules meet that standard? Which rules, Bears (and others) do you feel can be interpreted as IC rules?