Elections are contested between competing ideologies. Passionate advocates of political causes making their causes to an informed public before uniting in a shared commitment to the wonder of democracahahaha almost made it through that with a straight face.
Lots of things impact elections. Street lights going out depress turnout. Sunny weather increases turnout. Pamphlets with totally misleading statistics, debates that consist of slanging matches won by whosoever’s voice cracks last, spoiler candidates and petty local rivalries overshadowing broader national trends. Why not football results, too?
And in Græntfjall’s case, the football results are going to directly affect – though not outright decide – the election. How does it work?
Prior to each matchday, a set of two lists of options will be promulgated. The first option will be chosen according to the number of goals scored by the home team, the second by the number of goals scored by the away team. After the matchday’s results are announced, an election report will be written up using the prompted options.
Of course the election and World Cup are [IC] months away, so there’s plenty of time to get prepared, but few chances between then and now to test the system. So for this, potentially final, last brace of games in the Eagle’s Cup, the PHORCED-ACRONIM will receive a bit of a shakedown cruise…
The first major scandal of the campaign will involve…
0: David Austmannsson
1: Zóphonías Juliusson
2: Sigjón Þjóðbjörnsson
3: Kaija Michaelsdóttir
4: Queen Júlíana
5+: a frog called Bert
…and a hot…
0: mic
1: man
2: woman
3: dog
4: potato
5+: chilli pepper
The first major endorsement of the campaign will be of the…
0: Blue-Greens
1: Left-slate
2: NDF
3: Progressive Liberals
4: Liberal-Conservatives
5+: S-E-X Party
…by a famous…
0: footballer
1: journalist
2: priest
3: member of the royal family
4: business figure
5+: frog called Bert