Tenisi Trofe Gapur
Tusjak Open
Quarterfinals
Kamer Dova 3 6 3 4
Vasil Xhepa 6 4 6 6
Lindit Fejzullai 4 6 7 6
Rudin Dova 6 3 6 4
Skerdilaid Fangaj 7 6 6
Tonibler Mujeci 5 4 1
Jakupi Abazaj 7 3 2 6 4
Samet Arapi 6 6 6 2 6
Semifinals
Vasil Xhepa 3 6 4 6 7
Lindit Fejzullai 6 4 6 4 5
Skerdilaid Fangaj 6 7 3 2 6
Samet Arapi 1 6 6 6 4
Final
Vasil Xhepa 7 5 5 4
Skerdilaid Fangaj 5 7 7 6
The opinions were split, already before the final of the tournament got contested. Some acclaimed that it was the start of a new chapter in domestic history, with new stars surfacing in Xhepa and Fangaj, a duo with a combined age of forty-two. Others saw this rather as a bump in the road for the reigning names, as only Mujeci utterly disappointed - it took a long grind and a close fifth set to wave goodbye to Fejzullai and Arapi. With both finalists making their maiden appearance in this stage, it would have to be coincidence, the law of big numbers. I believe both sides in the argument are off in this case, they fail to see the bigger picture. This is no new can of traditional leaders and definitely no fait divers in tournament history. This Tusjak Open marked us closing the book on Lerujkan tennis as we know it.
For decades now, the scene always got its excitement out of clear-cut rivalries, who each after another tell the tale of the sport. The flamboyant Shefget Laska keeping the pragmatic Hermes Lenjani at bay. Fabjo Blaceri using all tricks in the book to halt the rise of Erand Zajmi, who in turn fought intense yet cordial battles against Hyjdhor Rexha. The elegant but fragile Giuliano Merseni seeing his empire cut short by Enkelejd Braho, who added a layer of technique when times went rough. The latest of these duels, these clashes of titans to draw the audiences, would be the one between Lindit Fejzullai, motivated and hungry to make his mark and Tonibler Mujeci, the bohemian whose every move looks so simple. Same tale, different names, a cynic would remark.
Writing Fangaj and Xhepa into this tradition is a sign of laziness. One only needs to cast an eye on 20-year old Skerdilaid Fangaj to note he is little like any of his predecessors. Muscled, he no longer competes in a game but a sport. He is the first to admit that his service is the result of countless hours in the gym, the same place where he got his stamina. No wonder that Samet Arapi muttered that "if he wanted to play a machine, he challenged his ball thrower on training", Fangaj simply returned everything. At 34 and kept off from a record breaking fifth triumph in Tusjak, Arapi has known the halcyon days when training ahead of this opening tournament was considered bad form or even rigging the competition. An eleventh Trofe victory seems further away than ever for the modest gentleman.
Fangaj's opponent Vasil Xhepa represents a different, albeit potentially equally important side of the rise to professionalism. In four years in the circuit, Xhepa never progressed beyond the quarterfinals despite showing glimpses of potential. Over the winter, he switched coaches and now approaches it with more seriousness, Xhepa explained. "We focus on those elements in my skillset where minimal progress allows maximal results. And we take our time to analyse the upcoming opposition." A tried and tested approach in sports but a novel concept in our tennis scene.
What makes this tournament a watershed is not the result from one or another, but the knowledge that far more players can be found where they are coming from: the qualifiers and opening rounds were filled to the brim with youngsters who looked more athletic than any of the former big names. And who were joined courtside by a whole team of trainers, physios and other assistants.
Does that spell the end of the (short) reign from Fejzullai and Mujeci? Both will have to adapt to the new standards or will sooner rather than later sink through the ranks. We give the advantage to Lindit Fejzullai who already represented a first step to more professionalism. A slow starter, he has been aware of the importance to continue his personal development as evidenced by his successful conversion from a clay specialist into an allrounder. Fact is that a happy-go-lucky approach, as talented as you are, will still win you a few games, but no longer the Open.
All in all, this will result in a wider, closer top of the food chain, resulting in narrow and long duels. A new style, but an improvement to the level even if less sophisticated at times. The second set of the final, a fierce and powerful fight over every point showed the beauty - the last set with Fangaj cementing an early lead with predictable yet effective service games demonstrates the flipside. However, we - and the old generation - better get used to it.