Unless this invite is rescinded, neither of you will receive a vote from me in anything you bid for from this point on because you have shown to be untrustworthy.
Advertisement
by Newmanistan » Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:07 pm
by Somewhereistonia » Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:10 pm
Newmanistan wrote:By inviting Jasi-yun, you have blatantly gone against something you said in your bid thread as an answer to my question:
Unless this invite is rescinded, neither of you will receive a vote from me in anything you bid for from this point on because you have shown to be untrustworthy.
by Newmanistan » Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:19 pm
by Valanora » Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:31 pm
Newmanistan wrote:It's actually quite significant. It allows an additional top-level seed (pot 1 likely) into the competition, therefore making things more difficult for the lower seeds who have RP'd to have success and win the thing. So far, I can't find the RP.
by Newmanistan » Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:37 pm
Valanora wrote:Newmanistan wrote:It's actually quite significant. It allows an additional top-level seed (pot 1 likely) into the competition, therefore making things more difficult for the lower seeds who have RP'd to have success and win the thing. So far, I can't find the RP.
Here is the RP.
Now if you would quit this bickering it would be appreciated. You have made it clear that you no longer wish to be involved in the World Cup for whatever reasons and yet you maintain a sign up to explicitly vote against bidders (as your own post implies). All this looks like to the casual observer is sour grapes over not being successful and deciding to take that out on innocent hosts rather than air the grievances and try to work towards a solution.
by Valanora » Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:40 pm
by Krytenia » Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:00 pm
Valanora wrote:Newmanistan wrote:It's actually quite significant. It allows an additional top-level seed (pot 1 likely) into the competition, therefore making things more difficult for the lower seeds who have RP'd to have success and win the thing. So far, I can't find the RP.
Here is the RP.
Now if you would quit this bickering it would be appreciated. You have made it clear that you no longer wish to be involved in the World Cup for whatever reasons and yet you maintain a sign up to explicitly vote against bidders (as your own post implies). All this looks like to the casual observer is sour grapes over not being successful and deciding to take that out on innocent hosts rather than air the grievances and try to work towards a solution.
by The Weegies » Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:01 pm
by Commerce Heights » Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:51 pm
Krytenia wrote:CH, may I suggest in future you put a little OOC note on your RPs to avoid this problem next time. If it was intended to be counted towards Jasiyun's RP total, it's somewhat ambiguous about it.
by Peisandros » Sat Jun 12, 2010 7:18 pm
by Daehanjeiguk » Sat Jun 12, 2010 8:02 pm
IFL
BoF23 勝|DBC5 勝
WC46(2nd)/52,53(R4)/42,44,49(R8)/39,43,45,47(R16)/40,41,50,51(G)
Host - OFC|CoH31|BoF28|WC41|CoH37 (as Allemenschen)|DBC12
RPs
Active: Reopening Old Wounds
Inactive: n/a/
Inventor of tl;dr
by Peisandros » Sat Jun 12, 2010 8:13 pm
by Starblaydia » Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:50 am
Daehanjeiguk wrote:Good grief, people... this is precisely what I was talking about a few weeks back when I mentioned overtly political gambles/schemes/whateverthehellyouwanttocallit. WCC votes/elections are not designed to be a vote contest; they're just a reasonable and minimally democratic method of choosing one or two people to run a game, like the dungeon master or something.
by The Babbage Islands » Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:53 am
Daehanjeiguk wrote:And to be frank, if you were upset by CH's use of a solitary account for the two participants, then perhaps you should have considered the possibility of telling CH that you felt that SLANI and JSY deserved separate NS accounts - just like everyone else appears to do - rather than wait on the final results and express your complaints after the fact? Because while it may be a legitimate complaint, CH has historically used just one account - pre-dating either your or my first World Cup - for both SLANI and JSY. I'm sure that this isn't the first complaint, but the timing is rather impeccable.
by Candelaria And Marquez » Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:32 am
Valanora wrote:There is no account for JSY as they are a separate federation and not nation.
by Newmanistan » Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:34 am
by Sarzonia » Sun Jun 13, 2010 6:23 am
by Bears Armed » Sun Jun 13, 2010 6:26 am
Candelaria And Marquez wrote:[The in-character status of the two Paripanan associations is irrelevant (Jeruselem and Jeru FC, as far as I’ve ever been able to tell, do not represent separate nations either) – Jasiyun rosters/RPs (!?) should be posted using a separate account, or at the very least accompanied with an OOC note identifying them as such (just as when those juggling two RP’d nations occasionally post using the wrong account).
That there RP was not in any way identified as being a Jasiyun one (indeed, as CH himself points out, it plainly wasn’t intended as one), and that association should not have been invited to, and handed an opportunity to win, the Cup of Harmony
by Commerce Heights » Sun Jun 13, 2010 6:46 am
Peisandros wrote:Okay, so CH updated those ranks (they were done a few games before the end of qualification) and we're using them? Sweet, thanks han.
(edit: can you please confirm this CH)
Candelaria And Marquez wrote:That there RP was not in any way identified as being a Jasiyun one (indeed, as CH himself points out, it plainly wasn’t intended as one), and that association should not have been invited to, and handed an opportunity to win, the Cup of Harmony – again.
by Sarzonia » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:06 am
Commerce Heights wrote:Only people who roleplay due to the incentives offered—viz., bonuses and Cup of Harmony qualification—rather than for their own enjoyment, should be allowed to participate in the Cup of Harmony?
by Krytenia » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:12 am
by Liventia » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:14 am
by Sarzonia » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:19 am
Liventia wrote:The rule has always been two separate nations are required; CH has (since Jolt) used just the one to RP for both his associations (which I do not find particularly fair).
Liventia wrote:However I agree with the view that it wasn't clearly an RP for either association; on that basis, and given CH's posting history within NS sports RP, I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt on this one - but still feel that he, like anyone else, should RP with the right nation.
Liventia wrote:Aside from the current controversy-of-sorts, I'm not comfortable with Newmanistan maintaining a signup for West Pocono just to keep his/her EWCC vote.
by Commerce Heights » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:26 am
by Starblaydia » Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:30 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Chromatika, Oberour Ar Moro
Advertisement