Free Republics wrote:Schiltzberg wrote:Dang, that's stone cold.
Also the OOC reason why I didn't do any counteroffers was because the offers were already incredibly high to a somewhat unrealistic degree, and I thought it would get out of hand if all the nations started bidding each other upwards of $45 million per year, since the top paid player IRL "only" makes $33 million.
I'm sure that's going to change a year from now when quite a few star players hit the free agent market. Rumor has it that teams "low-balled" the free agents this offseason because they're saving money for next year (but I wouldn't call 5 years, $125 million for an aging slugger with comparables whose batting stats fell off a cliff in what would be the equivalent of year 2 of that deal a "low-ball" offer).
That could be true. There is also speculation that salaries have been increasing at an alarming rate for the past decade, which has created sort of a bubble in the market, and that the bubble just popped this offseason, and we have reached the point where teams aren't going to pay $30 million per year for a Darvish or Arrieta anymore.








