Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:33 am
When is the next tournament?
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Britonisea wrote:When is the next tournament?
I just realized that I forgot to vote in Nova Anglicana. Whoops. Sorry.
But I meant to vote for you and you didn't really need it, so congrats anyway! And to everybody else who was voted in as well!
And fantastic job to Saugeais as WBC President. You did a great job and I haven't entered under a different president yet. Great job!
Personally, I don't want to be nominated. Running a twelve-person International Baseball Slam takes up enough of my time, I really don't want to quadruple that.
Nova Anglicana wrote:No hard feelings. I did garner the most "no" votes out of any new Councillor, so does that mean I'm the "bad boy" of the inductees? More than likely, it just means I need to take an SLL track on my RPs and improve them for the next go-round to prove I belong. But thank you to everyone who voted, even if you didn't want me in. I understand your concerns. Thank you to Saugeais for your service as WBC President and executing the duties therein. Incidentally, what are the official enumerated duties of said office?
Oh, and congratulations to everyone who was voted in. I know Imota will break through next round, and New Wolfopolis and Gregoryisgodistan have bright futures. To Welsh Cowboy, kudos for sticking around despite your struggles. I really enjoyed your "search for a nickname" RP line and I wish you best of luck in the future.
Civil Citizenry wrote:
San Jose Guayabal wrote:Sorry to change the topic but seeing the WBC Council criteria, I fill the criteria because I upload a roster and did RP in the two previous WBC's, by that reason I have a question, who's the next step to take part of the council?
Saugeais wrote:San Jose Guayabal wrote:Sorry to change the topic but seeing the WBC Council criteria, I fill the criteria because I upload a roster and did RP in the two previous WBC's, by that reason I have a question, who's the next step to take part of the council?
Yes, you RPed in the 27th WBC, and while you submited a roster both times, I didn't find a single RP in the 28th.
Also, looking at the long forgotten amendment, I seem to have broken one of the rules. So a step down would have to be necessary in this case.
Saugeais wrote:San Jose Guayabal wrote:Sorry to change the topic but seeing the WBC Council criteria, I fill the criteria because I upload a roster and did RP in the two previous WBC's, by that reason I have a question, who's the next step to take part of the council?
Yes, you RPed in the 27th WBC, and while you submited a roster both times, I didn't find a single RP in the 28th.
Also, looking at the long forgotten amendment, I seem to have broken one of the rules. So a step down would have to be necessary in this case.
San Jose Guayabal wrote:Saugeais wrote:
Yes, you RPed in the 27th WBC, and while you submited a roster both times, I didn't find a single RP in the 28th.
Also, looking at the long forgotten amendment, I seem to have broken one of the rules. So a step down would have to be necessary in this case.
So I can't? If I can't what's the required thing to get access to the Council?
Super-Llamaland wrote:Personally, I feel like the bar should be raised a lot higher, say, one roster/3 RPs in two classics or one roster/2 RPs in three classics. Does anyone else feel this way?
Also, I nominated Cassadaigua. In case you wanted to know.
Saugeais wrote:San Jose Guayabal wrote:Sorry to change the topic but seeing the WBC Council criteria, I fill the criteria because I upload a roster and did RP in the two previous WBC's, by that reason I have a question, who's the next step to take part of the council?
Yes, you RPed in the 27th WBC, and while you submited a roster both times, I didn't find a single RP in the 28th.
Also, looking at the long forgotten amendment, I seem to have broken one of the rules. So a step down would have to be necessary in this case.
Free Republics wrote:Super-Llamaland wrote:Personally, I feel like the bar should be raised a lot higher, say, one roster/3 RPs in two classics or one roster/2 RPs in three classics. Does anyone else feel this way?
Also, I nominated Cassadaigua. In case you wanted to know.
I don't see the need. If somebody isn't active enough, we can always vote them down.
Free Republics wrote:Super-Llamaland wrote:Personally, I feel like the bar should be raised a lot higher, say, one roster/3 RPs in two classics or one roster/2 RPs in three classics. Does anyone else feel this way?
Also, I nominated Cassadaigua. In case you wanted to know.
I don't see the need. If somebody isn't active enough, we can always vote them down.
Vaugania wrote:Drawing attention back to the Constitution, it seems that one could stay on the Council for 6 Classics through the use of Sections 2 and 3 in Article 1 and Section 4 of Article 2.
Super-Llamaland wrote:Vaugania wrote:Drawing attention back to the Constitution, it seems that one could stay on the Council for 6 Classics through the use of Sections 2 and 3 in Article 1 and Section 4 of Article 2.
If they hosted, yeah. They could host and then sit out for six WBCs in Host Rehab and then host again.