In reality, there are 8 other nations tied for 41st. My point was that there were people whining about being 15th when I was just happy to be 41st.
Advertisement

by The Sova Empire » Sat May 04, 2013 5:33 am

by The Sova Empire » Sat May 04, 2013 5:45 am
The Republic of Lanos wrote:So how does all this work out?

by The Serbian Empire » Sat May 04, 2013 10:44 am

by Allinlia » Sat May 04, 2013 4:59 pm


by Milchama » Sat May 04, 2013 11:30 pm

by Equestrian States » Mon May 06, 2013 4:48 pm


by Taeshan » Mon May 06, 2013 6:46 pm
Equestrian States wrote:Glad to be top ten in something for once. Now to get into the top five...
Also, good to see a host bid up now. I can find solid IC and OOC reasons for supporting it.

by Cassadaigua » Wed May 08, 2013 7:05 pm
Taeshan wrote:Equestrian States wrote:Glad to be top ten in something for once. Now to get into the top five...
Also, good to see a host bid up now. I can find solid IC and OOC reasons for supporting it.
I was all about to go oh hey since im undoubtably going to lose the host bid for the Copa Rushmori i might as well finally look to host the WBC, but then i checked the copa rushmori thread and i see i somehow won, making me reconsider.

by Taeshan » Wed May 08, 2013 7:08 pm
Cassadaigua wrote:Taeshan wrote:
I was all about to go oh hey since im undoubtably going to lose the host bid for the Copa Rushmori i might as well finally look to host the WBC, but then i checked the copa rushmori thread and i see i somehow won, making me reconsider.
Ironically, this was my thought process as well.... this being the other option if I lost CR 14.


by Karditan » Wed May 08, 2013 7:20 pm

by Cassadaigua » Wed May 08, 2013 7:22 pm
Karditan wrote:If anyone would really be so swayed towards Cassadaigua's bid merely for the fact that there are no ponies there, I would be willing to negotiate that your team (contingent on them making the playoffs) would play in a city with a higher percentage of human inhabitants.

by Karditan » Wed May 08, 2013 7:44 pm
Cassadaigua wrote:Karditan wrote:If anyone would really be so swayed towards Cassadaigua's bid merely for the fact that there are no ponies there, I would be willing to negotiate that your team (contingent on them making the playoffs) would play in a city with a higher percentage of human inhabitants.
I'll add that if anyone is so swayed by that: don't be.
I just put it there for the humor. (we do have ponies... they just don't talk!)


by Equestrian States » Wed May 08, 2013 8:26 pm
Super-Llamaland wrote:Cassadaigua wrote:Tiebreakers will see H2H as the first criteria. I strongly believe in this being the first option. Because in baseball, a home team does not hit in the bottom of the 9th if it is winning, I do not believe in H2H Run differential as a tiebreaker criteria.
Thank you for this. I failed to advance last time for the exact same reason.


by Cassadaigua » Tue May 14, 2013 10:17 am

by Allinlia » Tue May 14, 2013 10:40 am

by Cassadaigua » Tue May 14, 2013 10:52 am
Allinlia wrote:I love Cassadaigua's set up post for this WBC, and I especially love their choices in terms of playoff advancement, having the top 4 3rd place teams having a chance to advance is certain to create so many interesting storylines in all of the groups. (anyone who reads my RPS probably knows how fascinated I get with analyzing everyone's playoff chances!) more teams in playoff contention for longer will encourage more RPs.
We're off to an amazing start! Very excited
I only hope Cass isn't a subscriber of that "extra RP credit of the day" thing that I noticed some hosts have used for quite some time. The IBC host has been doing an admirable job so far imho but I've quickly not become a fan of those things now that I've experienced it for the first time and it's my only nit-pick in what has otherwise been a fun tourney. Guess it's just a personal taste thing.
Also is Cass using Karditan's idea of having the RP bonus carry into the playoffs?


by Allinlia » Tue May 14, 2013 10:54 am

by Beldonia » Tue May 14, 2013 11:33 am

by Ko-oren » Tue May 14, 2013 11:37 am
Beldonia wrote:Quick question, as this is only the second WBC I'll be actively participating in. Is there protocol for how much the players on my rosters should age since the last WBC, or is that kind of up to me? I assume that it's just up to me, but I wanted to check.

by Cassadaigua » Tue May 14, 2013 11:56 am
Beldonia wrote:Quick question, as this is only the second WBC I'll be actively participating in. Is there protocol for how much the players on my rosters should age since the last WBC, or is that kind of up to me? I assume that it's just up to me, but I wanted to check.

by Equestrian States » Tue May 14, 2013 1:37 pm
Cassadaigua wrote:Group 3
The Republic of Lanos (UR)
Free Republics (UR)
Skeckoa (41)
Equestrian States (6)
Strawbee (33)
Karditan (19)


by Allinlia » Tue May 14, 2013 2:05 pm

by Ko-oren » Tue May 14, 2013 2:15 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Chromatika, Diarcesia, Drawkland, Esterazdravo, The Plough Islands, The South Pacific Sporting Committee
Advertisement