Advertisement
by Jessolia » Thu Jul 05, 2018 8:04 pm
by Cute Plushies » Thu Jul 05, 2018 8:14 pm
by Maldico » Thu Jul 05, 2018 8:44 pm
by Lycrabon » Thu Jul 05, 2018 8:50 pm
by Union of Socialist Alpine Republics » Thu Jul 05, 2018 8:53 pm
by United Republic of Marcia » Thu Jul 05, 2018 9:01 pm
by Skanov » Thu Jul 05, 2018 9:11 pm
by The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom » Thu Jul 05, 2018 9:25 pm
St. Olgsburg Post
OP-ED
A Treatise On Free Trade
The economist's desk
6th July 2018 10:05 a.m.
Last edited: 12:25 p.m.Ever since the Wealth of Nations energised world trade, through the epochs of mercantilism up through the current digital economy, divergent views have persistently plagued academicians and politicians alike on what benefits nations can derive from free and open mutual trade, to what extent can they protect their own industries and jobs, and indeed, whether nations should participate in free trade agreements at all.
We here at the economist's desk oppose such a naive and fanciful notion that Free Trade will bring prosperity to everyone, everywhere, who joined their hands in exuberant hopes only to reap sorrowful fruits of disappointment, disenfranchisement, and inevitable decay in quality of living. We will present below a short treatise to explain our position. However, in order to best illustrate our arguments to our dear readers, a certain degree of brutal honesty is necessary although we offer no apologies for any hurt feelings (we know you are patriotic Templedomians)!
The Treatise
Free trade, that is, the unfettered flow and/or exchange of (pre-)manufactured products, capital, and technologies, in truth merely benefits nationstates that are - for lack of a better word - special in some way.
We are not the biggest
The nation with the largest rural population will in all likelihood have the largest pool of surplus cheap labour through the much-studied effects of demographic shifts accompanying the process of urbanisation. Generally speaking, this has the effect of smoothening wages to meet the lowest common denominator. This cannot be good for our shared goal of national growth in the fundamentals underpinning our Rule and Strength, namely, a diversified economy, self-sufficiency in production, and high wages.
We are not the brightest
Our level of technology pales in comparison to the most scientifically and technologically-advanced nations in the world. Hence, using the example of the I.T. industry which employs some 25% of our workforce, without government subsidies to assist in research & development, and without vital safeguards against foreign monopoly of our domestic market in I.T. goods and services, our local firms will be unable to compete and thus relegated to those low-margin, low-tech, highly-competitive segments.
We need our weapons manufacturers
While such matters are beyond the scope of our training, we feel that our national security depends on a robust arms manufacturing sector which not only supplies our own defense needs but augment their profitability from time to time with export sales (subject to Senate approval). Due to national security concerns, this strategic sector must be thoroughly insulated from foreign influences and regulated (ie, subsidized) according to our strategic needs. Our weapons manufacturers become exposed to reprisals under the pretext of Free Trade when, for instance, exporting aerospace equipment for the civilian market. This poses a danger of asymmetric warfare waged against us by any other name.
So what can Templedom offer to other nations under the FTA?
A market with high purchasing power. After the initial 'honeymoon' of cheap imports and low-interest credit, Templedomians will face the gloomy prospects of factory closures, unattractive jobs, tightening wages, and mounting consumer debts. One or two specialised industries may very well experience booming business with the removal of trade barriers and de-regulation (uranium mining, insurance companies, etc.) but on the whole, our consumers will be much worse-off. Therefore we cannot make the recommendation to our policy-makers regarding the Reichsburg Free Trade Agreement or any other similar proposals.
-- SONA/Econ.
by Free Republics » Thu Jul 05, 2018 10:10 pm
by Liongya » Thu Jul 05, 2018 10:16 pm
by Teufelhounden » Thu Jul 05, 2018 10:18 pm
by Great Winminster » Thu Jul 05, 2018 10:38 pm
by Mount Shavano » Thu Jul 05, 2018 10:47 pm
Advertisement
Return to Global Economics and Trade
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement