Advertisement
by Neu Engollon » Mon Dec 25, 2017 12:03 pm
The Librarian and Ausitorian Leaders,
I speak with the weight of the Federal Council, and act as the vocal piece of that ruling body of the Confederacy of Neu Engollon in the following statements made upon the needless and overreaching controversy brought forth by the Confederated Commonwealth of Libraria and Ausitoria in reaction to the benevolent accords of the Reichsburg Free Trade Agreement.
As you are correct in your assumptions that through both Federal agencies and local based, adequately taxed corporations that drive the GDP of the Confederacy, we have quite a stake in the fluctuations and trends of the general market throughout the multiverse, we are forced to weigh in on such matters though we may vigorously shake our heads and stifle both giggles and yawns, alternately.
The legitimacy of claims made by your government is questionable, to make a gross understatement. To decide that one must hijack such a trade agreement and force it's own overlay of guidelines and demands upon a document which is already most sufficient to address the flow of free trade is ludicrous. Further, to back your claims with a domestic court of your own concoction that is not recognized in most, if any other, international jurisdiction, adds insult to injury to the Free Kingdom which has striven to provide a blueprint for a new dawn of economic prosperity to the multiverse.
What is most troubling is the implied hostility of threat which is the very motto of your 'kangaroo court'. To quote:'Taking from the bad, and giving to the good: The Modern Robin Hood' and 'Avoiding wars by seizing international aid assets since 2015'
This implies that your government sees as its mandate that, due to its highly subjective and selfish notions, it can lash out and seize by force assets of other peaceful, international law abiding nations at whim, simply because their aims and ideology do no match with your own. A very aggressive and peace disrupting action, if only by lame threat with no real teeth to back such actions. Were this to happen directly to the Confederacy, we must warn you, not only would we react to the fullest of our modest capability as an admittedly smaller, neutral democracy, but we would call upon friendly nations, of which we count many, to aid us in righting such egregious wrongs.
Perhaps that is reaching too far ahead as you have not directly forced such action onto the Confederacy. After all, though, you have now called to task a friend of the Confederacy's, the Free Kingdom of Allanea, who's only crime is reaching out to the world with open arms and providing a blueprint of prosperity by which we can all stand to gain. Your demands are ridiculous that you both be allowed to enjoy the benefits and connections of the Agreement, yet also be allowed to slam the hammer down and restrict exports of nations within that same fold of the Agreement, in very violation of said Agreement.
The last point, which hopefully should defuse and deflate your bombastic, egotistical ramblings, is that it is very simple to avoid bringing things to a further contentious head by ignoring and electing not to participate in that which you find displeases you.
In other words, if you don't want to play - simply do not. You have missed the whole point when you call the nations signed to the Reichsburg Free Trade Agreement out for adhering to an agreement that you in turn have no intention of honoring but insist on signing. Your begging for inclusion, but insisting on exception is not rational in this instance. Rational governments realize that if they do not agree to the points put forth, they do not have to sign to the agreement, as there is no figurative gun to their heads to do so. Those that do not act with such rationality are the ones who demand a rule change that would in effect negate the whole spirit of the accords simply to satisfy their own selfish ends.
You, kind sirs and ladies, are that irrational government that has demanded to be able to do exactly the opposite of what the spirit of the Agreement calls for, which is to not levy obstruction to the free flow of commerce between nations. What children hold such executive power over a nation of self proclaimed sentient beings? It boggles our minds to think there are lands ruled with such careless abandon, but we are at least assured of little consequences towards the greater multiverse as we can all come together to navigate with reason around said foolishness.
On behalf of the Federal Assembly, Federal Council and the Great Citizens of the Confederacy of Neu Engollon, I have spoken on this day.
Sincerely,
Dietfried Plemarche,
Ministry of Finance & Commerce, Neu Engollon
by Peoples Federation Of Gondol » Tue Dec 26, 2017 2:30 am
by Allanea » Tue Dec 26, 2017 4:00 am
Peoples Federation Of Gondol wrote:Free Trade Agrement accepted by the state duma,city council and Department of Trade and International Development.
by Libraria and Ausitoria » Tue Dec 26, 2017 4:04 am
Pax Prosperitas - Gloria in Maere
By Order of Their Imperial Majesty's Government
From: The Freedom of Information Office, The Whittan Office, The Aestorian Commonwealth
To: Dietfried Plemarche, Minister of Finance & Commerce, of the Federal Council of The Confederacy of Neu Engollon
Encryption: Publicly Announced
Your Excellency,
Thank you very much for your message. We cannot presently determine whether it is intended for the aligned governments, the Aestorian Commonwealth of Libraria and Ausitoria, and/or the International Arbitration Court. Please note the International Arbitration Court does not fall within the Aestorian Commonwealth. As such we have bifurcated the message as follows:
1. Judicial matters (to the International Arbitration Court).
2. Executive matters (to the Commonwealth).
If you would prefer any other manner of communication, please advise.
We have the honour to remain,
The International Directorate
The Watch Office
Freedom of Information Office
The Ministry of Intelligence and Statistics
On behalf of the Outer Commonwealth, &c.
Pax Prosperitas - Gloria in Maere
By Order of Their Imperial Majesty's Government
From: The Whittan Office, The Aestorian Commonwealth
To: Dietfried Plemarche, Minister of Finance & Commerce, of the Federal Council of The Confederacy of Neu Engollon
CC: Lawyers in the Confederacy of Neu Engollon, Lawyers in the Free Kingdom of Allanea, General Investors
Encryption: Publicly Announced
Your Excellency,
Thank you for your message. As I hope you will understand, I cannot speak for the International Arbitration Court, which is a separate power, but I would ask and advise you to respect their independence, rather than engaging in what is potentially at best misinformed slander. The issues at hand are exceptionally thorny questions of literary interpretation (as is almost inevitable when trade agreements are written with such lack of detail) and are by no means settled. That is why we, alongside the Decis regional government, requested the court's judgement on how to interpret the treaty in the aftermath of Allanea's reply to our protocol of interpretation.
If you do wish to have input into proceedings, which I am sure would be most welcomed from any parties, I would advise you to properly consider legal arguments of relevance to addressing the actual questions of law in a manner such as a lawyer might understand, as opposed to engaging in arguments of unclear legal significance or substance, if any. Inasmuch as we can determine, the crux of the dispute is that the words "punitive" in clause 1 (“No Signatory Nation shall level punitive tariffs or taxes against products imported by another Signatory Nation") is of unclear meaning. In short, is it "punitive" to restrict imports from subsidized industries? What are "punitive tariffs" in the context of this treaty and in the context of international law? I do not know. We do not know. The court has not yet decided. Allanea has failed and refused to issue any clear guidance. If you focused on that question, rather than seemingly missing the point, or if you could persuade the Allanean Executive or Judicial powers to issue a clear opinion/guidance on the subject, that would be useful.
Additionally I would like to say that as far as I can determine, the Court's request for input is quite reasonable. They wish to know what counts as "punitive tariffs". Our governments wish to know what counts as "punitive tariffs". And we all want to know why. These are not unreasonable questions in light of the provisions of WAR #207, the main international trading standard, which allows for nations to levy additional tariffs on foreign subsidized industries. Therefore if you wish to maintain a reputation as a multilateral mediator you could drop your unprovoked belligerent attitude and help to engage in clarifying an important question of interpretation in international trade, rather than unilaterally isolating yourself from international discussion.
Finally I would also like to assure you that the Court itself has no authority to seize assets of its own initiative, only to seize our aid to which nations are otherwise entitled to (see the Liberal Development Bank). That is what is meant by aid assets. Only if this are insufficient assets available from that source to cover damages will our government consider other asset seizure measures.
I would also like to take the opportunity to publicly reassure all private persons and corporate personalities about their own assets. Private individuals cannot and should not need to be held responsible for the acts of their governments.
I hope that makes things clearer - if you have any questions, I would be very happy to advise.
Separately, I would also like to thank you for clarifying your government's current intent.
I have the honour to remain,
RHT= P v7-3
His Serene Maharaja=Anax=Inquisitor, Pope=President=Princips=Palatine=Patriarch Richard VII "Hajim-Rik" Terforton=Pirnzak,
Whittan Secretary and Foreign Secretary, the Aestorian Commonwealth; (Acting) Delegate & Prime Minister of the Panessos Senate
&c, &c.
acting for
The Outer Commonwealth, &c.
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]
by Allanea » Tue Dec 26, 2017 5:44 am
by Libraria and Ausitoria » Tue Dec 26, 2017 6:52 am
Pax Prosperitas - Gloria in Maere
By Order of Their Imperial Majesty's Government
From: The Whittan Office, The Aestorian Commonwealth
To: The Free Kingdom Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Allanea
Encryption: Publicly Announced
Your Excellencies,
Thank you very much for your opinion on the points of law. I expect the court will find it a useful clarification.
But why are you so intent upon trying to damage our reputations? Your second point seems to be nothing but slander. You just don’t seem to get it: this court means that if you damage us, then you, and to an extent your allies, won’t get our aid, which means that it will be Allanea that will lose out every time they try to damage us, because the courts will take the money you would have got in aid and give it to us in damages instead. We've done it to SACTO and we've done it to the IFC. So stop shooting yourself in the foot by shooting your own mouth off. Only you loose out.
To sum, it is completely pointless being pointlessly rude to the Ausitorians. It means you don’t get money from them. I should have hoped a capitalist society would have learnt to act in its own self-interest, and to be prepared to work with its natural allies instead of against them.
I have the honour to remain,
RHT= P v7-3
His Serene Maharaja=Anax=Inquisitor, Pope=President=Princips=Palatine=Patriarch Richard VII "Hajim-Rik" Terforton=Pirnzak,
Whittan Secretary and Foreign Secretary, the Aestorian Commonwealth; (Acting) Delegate & Prime Minister of the Panessos Senate
&c, &c.
acting for
The Outer Commonwealth, &c.
P.s. Allanean citizens, you might want to petition your government to act with a modicum of sense before they manage to do you out of c. $400 aid per citizen.
P.p.s. Also, for heaven’s sakes stop conflating us Aestorians with the court. Only bored lawyers who want to start an argument about the nature of sovereignty in the confederacy and commonwealth have any reason to do that, and we have quite enough of them around here in Alexandria.
In reply to the Allanean Communication to the Confederated Commonwealth
The International Arbitration Court
Panessos City & Unity City
Panessos & Decis
We would like to thank the Allanean Foreign Ministry for their clarification of their interpretation of the points of law. If we strip away the immediately irrelevant points, they have argued:
(a) The issue falls outside our jurisdiction,
(b) That the simplicity of the treaty makes no allowance for the existence of non-punitive tariffs, and
(c) That the teleogical wish expressed in their clarifications is more binding upon signatories than the literal wording of the agreement.
These and other arguments will be considered as part of the proceedings. We expect to issue a preliminary ruling around the end of Q1 of the 2017 FY.
We have also received a submission from the Confederacy and Commonwealth to ask us to assess damages due to discriminatory, malicious, prejudiced and/or libellous slander by the Allanean and Neu Engollon Governments arising as a result of this case; minus whatever damages the Aestorian Government is perpetrating by being rude back. We have accepted this request. This assessment will naturally be considered separately. Since the damages may be fairly high, perhaps c. 0.1-0.5% of GDP, and normal asset seizures may be insufficient, we have, in the interim, also frozen the use of Ausitorian aid to support operations by the Allanean-led Armistad declaration. It should be noted that in the event that it is necessary to seize such assets, the court will provide redress for anti-slavery efforts led by less slanderous nations so that global anti-slavery operations are not negatively affected. We have also frozen $200 billion of Ausitorian assets, in case it turns out that they are being ruder.
While these cases are ongoing, we remain open to submissions, statements, and requests from signatories to the Reichsburg (Allanean) Free Trade Agreement, and to governments over the relevant jurisdictions.
We have the honour to remain, &c.
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]
by The Ctan » Tue Dec 26, 2017 7:11 am
Transmission Source: Bao ita Dyvanakh, Grouping Policy Manager Mystria, Security Agency of the Great Civilization.
Destination: RFTA Signatories
CC: The Aestorian Commonwealth Government
Subject: Sir Thomas Wooley
Security: Nil
To those signatories of the Reichsburg Free Trade Agreement currently receiving bulletins and missives from The Aestorian Commonwealth, I would like to share a story that speaks to the current situation and will, I think, inform those who have not previously dealt with the commonwealth of the exact nature of their diplomatic intentions.
Many years past now, we were, with the Commonwealth, part of an organization called the International Union of Equality and Freedom, a fine institution and one that is sadly no longer active. During a meeting of this organization, the matter was discovered of the Commonwealth, then called Libraria and Ausitoria, spying on the host nation, the Beastling States of Crystal Spires. Specifically in this matter the Commonwealth violated the territorial waters of the Beastling States with multiple nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarines.
As a result, the ambassador, then-Sir Thomas Wooley, of the Commonwealth was declared Persona Non-Grata by the host nation and directed to expediently leave. This he refused to do, declaring, contrary to the actual wording of the treaty involved, that he enjoyed a status of diplomatic immunity conferred by the Union, rather than the host nation, and refusing to leave his seat, despite no other nation present having agreed to such terms, and a complete lack of them in the treaty defining the Union.
Furthermore, when ushers arrived to remove him, Sir Wooley decided to take the only course of action the strange matter of Aestorian ethics allowed him. He spontaneously decided to ‘arrest’ the chairman of the union, Maven Auryn, then-Chancellor of the Beastling States. And this arrest consisted of firing a dart from a concealed weapon at the Chancellor.
Our ambassador at the time, Praetia Astraeus was able to discern this threat and interpose herself; quite fortunately as it turned out, Chancellor Auryn having several well-known medical conditions that would have rendered him likely susceptible to overdose or injury.
Ambassador Wooley also stated his intention at this time to kidnap the Chancellor of the Beastling States before he was quickly subdued by the guards.
This event has lived in infamy, and given the Aestorian Commonwealth the popular appellation it bears to this day; Assassinland.
As the Beastling States was at that time militarily weakened and concerned by the possibility of further coercion from Ausitoria and Chattakang, they elected not to press charges against Ambassador Wooley for his attempt to kidnap their leader.
With no treaty explicitly creating diplomatic immunity having been created or signed, and the Ausitorian government standing by its claim that the Chancellor of the Beastling States did not benefit from personal immunity as a head of state, it was deemed by the Great Civilization that no reasonable expectation or conduct befitting traditional diplomatic immunity (you cannot attempt to abduct a head of state, ignoring head of state immunity, and then claim it for your own person) was in force in the instance of Mr Wooley, and he was placed on trial in the Criminal Court of Henetmiropolis for Causing Bodily Harm by Dangerous Means (then Sec 224 of the C’tani General Criminal Code) specifically under the aggravating condition of using drugs in commission of a crime, and of acting by stealth in assault.
Sir Wooley refused to enter a plea; and despite repeated efforts, the nation of Ausitoria and Chattakang would not provide for his legal defence, as such, a court defender was appointed to him, and a plea of not-guilty entered pro-forma.
Naturally, with his entire crime having been recorded in front of hundreds of witnesses, this was an open and shut case.
Sir Wooley was sentenced to punishment of imprisonment for ten years, the maximum allowable under the law. He served this sentence in the Bayan Prison and was released after six years on conditional early release, and immediately expelled back to his homeland, where I believe they made him a Lord.
I highlight this history chiefly to examine the degree to which the Aestorian Commonwealth in fact respects other nations; and the fact that its undeclared policy of universal jurisdiction – not something we entirely disagree with in principle, we ourselves implement universal jurisdiction over matters such as genocide and slavery – is nothing new, nor is its persistent interest in harassing other governments, going so far as to have its ambassadors assault other nations’ leaders with intent to kidnap at diplomatic conferences.
The serial dishonesty of Assassinland, and its unwillingness to address the behaviour of its own diplomats – who do not respect customary immunities – is of course, why we do not consider these people to be suitable to run any sort of criminal court.
We’re also all a little bemused here at the idea that the Ausitorians have that the Allaneans claim their aid; as far as we are aware they claim no more than we do, which is to say, none. As they are an unstable pariah state fond of parking nuclear weapons in other people’s countries, regardless of the fact that it may see them obliterated, we also have negligible, perhaps no, investments or assets in Auistoria. Smart investors do not invest in countries that like to pick fights with nations much stronger than they are using nuclear weapons.
Please feel free to direct any queries to my office.
Deng Bao ita Dyvanakh
by Corlansa » Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:18 am
State Department of Corlansa
Auth: Office of the Secretary of State
Req: Office of the Presidency
Comp: [12/26/17]
by Allanea » Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:40 am
Corlansa wrote:The United States of Corlansa is interested in signing this agreement. However we retain some concerns, we have restrictions on several things that would be considered imports: Such as ivory, certain firearms, and several other things that would be harvested from endangered, or otherwise, species illegally. Would such restrictions need to be lifted?State Department of Corlansa
Auth: Office of the Secretary of State
Req: Office of the Presidency
Comp: [12/26/17]
United States of Corlansa
by Corlansa » Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:56 am
State Department of Corlansa
Auth: Office of the Secretary of State
Req: Office of the Presidency
Comp: [12/26/17]
by Corlaans » Tue Dec 26, 2017 12:32 pm
Department of Intercommonwealth Affairs
Auth: Office of the Regional State Department Secretariat
Req: Office of the Presidency of Corlansa, Office of the Governor of Corlaans
Comp: [12/26/17]
by Libraria and Ausitoria » Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:05 am
by Allanea » Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:10 am
by The Ctan » Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:12 am
I'm amused you think that the hospital wouldn't spot coma-inducing levels of barbituates in his bloodwork. But hey ho. It was five out-of-character years ago, my timeline's advanced faster than that; this being nationstates I'm sure you've dealt with people who have had different amounts of time pass before.Libraria and Ausitoria wrote:[OOC: Ctan, much as I respect your right to suppose whatever historical events you like in your canon, whether they correspond with what actually happened or not, I should point out that the historical record shows:
(1) That the Ausitorians were of the opinion that the Spirians attempted to deprive an IUEF member of representation in a manner contrary to international law,
(2) That Sir Thomas was in a convenient* coma,
(3) That no proper provision was allowed for his defence,
(4) That Ausitoria’s use of the word “spying” was in the context of “espying”, i.e. observing, which is commonplace among all nations which pay any attention to international affairs while enjoying freedom of navigation (of which I understand Allanea is one),
(5) That Ausitoria maintains that one has to park submarines somewhere (and it is known to be pointless keeping them in home waters, as Allanea &c. demonstrates),
(6) That the incident was not more than ten years ago (and a lot less with relative time), and Thomas remains in the convenient* coma,
But... Spires itself has the death penalty. It even has and inflicts death by torture in gruesome unspecified ways. From the context I think they have Lingchi, the actual death by a thousand cuts. They've done it in RP, not sure why you think they signed onto these conventions. EDIT: Checked, and yes, I'm right about their 'purification' execution being basically-Lingchi (slow-slicing).(7) That Spires deprived attempts by Ausitoria to provide Thomas Wooley with proper medical assistance,
(8) That Spires operated on a comatose patient of unfamiliar metabolism and stole part of his fingernail in a manner contrary to medical advice, and
(9) That Spires intended to extradite a potentially dangerously comatose patient who should not have been moved to a realm which was publicly ready to kill him in a manner contrary to the international conventions barring the death penalty.
No, it's very much you. But my response to past interactions with you is absolutely based on our past RP history, and is something you need to work hard to mend in character if you want a more favourable response. Wrangling and handwringing about OOC details of an RP that's five years in the past is not likely to get you the influence you crave.(*Induced. I acknowledge I ought to have mentioned this at this time, but I wasn’t sure that you would appreciate the meaning of SIC. Sorry).
As far as my own canon goes, let the historical record speak for itself.
Anyway, you may wish to make any corrections to your canon to bring it in line with what actually happened. Of course I am not saying that your communique has to tell the truth – but for me to reply, I do need to know that it exists in the same reality, and has any bearing on anything here. Therefore please do let us know. Of course if the Ausitoria you're talking about is completely unrelated to this Ausitoria, I'd be much obliged if you'd please remove your post].
by Neu Engollon » Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:53 pm
To: The Freedom of Information Office, The Whittan Office, The Aestorian Commonwealth
Copies To: The Federal Council of The Confederacy
From: François Schiendl, Ministry of Justice, Genève, The Confederacy of Neu Engollon
To Those It May Concern at the Freedom of Information Office within the Whittan Office,
The correspondence and subsequent replies to the Minister of Finance and Commerce, Dietfried Plemarche, from agencies and officials of the Aestorian Commonwealth and all entities associated with (claimed or not), have been reviewed by the Federal Council, upon forwarding from the Finance Minister and review by the Justice Ministry and National Security Ministry.
Matters formerly addressed to the Finance and Commerce Ministry from such prior mentioned entities are now to be handled by those entrusted with the security of the Confederacy, within and without its borders. Any further correspondence with the Finance Minister, separately from the Federal Council to which he is a part, is now to cease and desist, upon orders of the High Federal Circuit Court of the Confederacy, in Telleursville, upon the date of receival of this document.
Litigious threats levied on the Confederacy from the Aestorian Commonwealth, through the use of sham courts with zero jurisdiction such as the self-proclaimed ‘International Arbitration Court’ by the Commonwealth have been taken into account on its ludicrous face, but not to a level that would interrupt the natural, normal flow of government duties. It must be noted that we have taken into account how rapidly the afore mentioned supposed independent court, based in Panessos, reacted, within hours, to accusations leveled at the Commonwealth and acted accordingly, indicating a high level of collaboration with the government of the Commonwealth.
Further investigation of this International Arbitration Court and its lack of jurisdiction in most all other realms of the multiverse confirms that it is a tool of the Commonwealth and will be treated as such, with no other denials by the Commonwealth or its officials having any bearing on this decision.
Measures have been taken to ensure the economic and territorial integrity of the Confederacy, and we will demand that the Commonwealth desist in all activities that may further put in jeopardy the relationship between our two nations, risking its own economic and political solvency in the process.
No further reply is necessary to this remittance.
Most Sincerely,
François Schiendl, Minister of Justice, The Confederacy of Neu Engollon
by Santiland Repubilc » Wed Dec 27, 2017 6:55 pm
Advertisement
Return to Global Economics and Trade
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement