Please visit the Lamplight Technologies main storefront for purchases or other enquiries.
LTAP M1 "Draconis" Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile
Statistics:
Type: ASBM
Place of origin: Conite Congressional Republic
In service: 2015
Used by: Conite Defence Force
Weight: 10,000 kilograms
Length: 10.5 metres
Diameter: 1 metre
Warhead: 1, payload variable
Engine: Multiple stage, hybrid propellant
Operational range: 2,000km
Speed: Over Mach 8
Guidance system: Inertial + active radar homing terminal guidance
Launch platform: Various, mobile launch capable
Abstract:
The Draconis is a multi-stage, hybrid fuel rocket, single warhead ballistic missile. It is primarily designed as a quasi ballistic hypersonic missile, intended to be used from land based mobile launchers as an advanced anti ship ballistic missile (ASBM), for reliably eliminating hostile warships at sea with accuracy and at considerable distances. Draconis makes use of a maneuverable reentry vehicle with a terminal guidance system, allowing targeting of mobile carrier groups and other otherwise difficult to strike naval force projection platforms.
Hybrid-Fuel System:
Lamplight Technologies researchers explored a number of options to fuel the next generation Draconis missile. The majority of rockets use either solid or liquid propellant. Solid propellant is uncomplicated to store and handle, is generally simple in application and inexpensive to produce, and its high density allows for more compact sizes. Liquid fueled rockets are notably more efficient, having a higher 'specific impulse', which means the trust provided per unit of propellant is greater. They also provide greater control in flight in that they can be remotely throttled. However, the oxidizers they rely on are moderately difficult to store and handle, as they are very reaction to even common materials, generally toxic due to nitric acids, and require cryogenic storage in liquid nitrogen. More exotic oxidizers are more energetic, but even more unstable and toxic.
The Draconis was expected to spend considerable lengths of time in storage, yet be ready to launch at a moment's notice, which was not a context where liquid propellant excelled. Solid propellant rockets however could remain in storage for exceptionally long periods, and still launch reliably on short notice. These factors made solid propellant initially a more favourable source of fuel than liquid propellant. This was balanced against the increased performance of liquid fuel, which equated to increased range, which was also an important consideration for the project.
The research team eventually settled on a hybrid rocket, which makes use of both types of propellant, solid and liquid, in two different phases. This hybrid system consists of a pressure vessel which contains the liquid propellant, which is kept initially separate from the combustion chamber which contains the solid propellant. The liquid propellant is an oxidizing agent, a chemical which transfers electronegative atoms, such as oxygen, to a 'substrate', the other chemical that is being modified. The solid propellant is the 'fuel', the material which stores potential energy to be released by activity of the oxidizer. A valve isolates the two, which is opened to allow the liquid propellant into the combustion chamber, where it is ignited and subsequently vaporized and reacted with the solid propellant. This creates combustion and therefore thrust.
Because of the size of this rocket, a turbopump is necessary to achieve a high flow rate and maintain pressurisation of the liquid fuel chamber. It was considered that the turbopump could be powered by using an oxidizer that doubled as a monopropellant, but this would have made the rocket significantly less efficient. Instead a high performance battery is simply included, well insulated to prevent sparks or other interference.
Draconis makes use of hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB), a cross-linked rubber, for its solid fuel, in particular because this allows for high potential energy fuel additives in the form of reactive metals. Aluminium, magnesium, lithium, and beryllium can be added to the fuel grain to considerably increase specific impulse. This fuel has a high regression rate to avoid the need for multi port fuel grains, which would create structural deficiencies. Liquid oxygen is used as the liquid oxidizer.
Though seemingly complex, hybrid rockets are considerably simpler than comparable performance liquid fuel rockets. One pressure chamber to store the singular liquid requires less plumbing valves, and associated machinery. There is also no requirement for a liquid flow cooling system, as the combustion chamber is already lined with solid propellant which shields it. The casing around this fuel grain has a composite structure that easily withstands pressures and extreme temperatures.
The hybrid rocket has a number of advantages over solid propellant rockets, which are by far the most common in military application missile technology. Liquid oxidizers can achieve a higher specific impulse than solid oxidizers, making them more efficient and therefore overall fuel consumption lower, equivalent to the performance of a hydrocarbon based liquid motor. With the addition of metallized fuel a hybrid engine can achieve specific impulse of 400, as compared to 250 for a solid propellant rocket, and only just short of 450 for a bipropellant liquid rocket. This gives the rocket an effective exhaust velocity of roughly 4000 m/s.
Despite the much cited simplicity of a solid fuel platform, hybrid rockets are in fact broadly safer. Due to separation of oxidizer and fuel, the missile is essentially benign, making it tolerant of potential processing errors and immune to ignition by stray electrical charges. Put simply, when deprived of an oxygenizer, the rocket cannot combust explosively. Solid fuel is composed of chemically and thermally incompatible elements, which can cause distortion in response to repeated temperature changes, while a hybrid system avoids this issue entirely. This allows the missile to be transported and loaded safely, only arming the weapon when in its launch position. The significant hazards associated with handling solid rocket fuel essentially offsets its simplicity. Well designed hybrids in comparison are very safe.
Hybrid rockets also present useful advantages in control of the weapon. The ability to stop and start, as well as throttling in real time to control the combustion rate, are easily incorporated into the design through manipulation of the isolating valve.
Disadvantages of a hybrid rocket include relatively high complexity that would arise in refueling a depleted rocket. Considering the purpose of the rocket, this is not a real issue. Some hybrid rockets with ineffective designs suffer from an oxidizer to fuel ratio shift, where the fuel production to oxidizer flow rate changes as fuel grain regresses. For well designed systems this has minimal impact on performance and specific impulse.
As a slightly less important aside, the hybrid rocket engine is more environmentally friendly than a high performance solid fuel rocket. The latter make use of oxidizers which contain chlorine and composites with ammonium perchlorate, which are potentially harmful. Draconis uses benign liquid oxygen as an oxidizer, for a much cleaner burn.
Trajectory, Guidance, Impact:
A traditional ballistic missile follows a standard ballistic flightpath, where its trajectory is governed by the law of classical mechanics, after its initial powered and guided phase. This is not a system designed to hit moving targets as it is quite simply not capable of adjustment. The Draconis is quasi ballistic, as though following a largely ballistic flightpath it can perform maneuvers in flight and make changes in direction and range.
Missile trajectory is divided into three phases; boost, midcourse, and terminal. Upon launch, the first and second stages of the rocket are used to boost the rocket upwards on an inertially guided trajectory. Both these stages are sequentially separated from the rocket as their fuel supplies are depleted. During this powered stage of flight attitude, guidance, and roll commands can be executed by remote control of swivel nozzles and air vanes attached to both the propulsion stages.
At a predetermined height and after separation from the propulsion stages, the missile enters midcourse, travelling by free flight at a high suborbital altitude to cover large distances quickly The reentry vehicle is pitched downwards, partly so it is oriented correctly for reentry, and also to reduce radar cross section and hamper attempts to locate and track the missile.
Draconis makes use of a maneuverable reentry vehicle (MARV), capable of executing velocity control maneuvers under inertial guidance control. Upon reentry, the missile enters a boost glide trajectory that employs aerodynamic lift in the upper atmosphere, and grants the MARV considerably enhanced maneuverability while gliding. Utilising boost glide technology, the missile can effectively double its initial range over the purely ballistic trajectory, allowing time to reacquire potentially mobile targets. Additionally, by avoiding an otherwise predictable standard ballistic trajectory, it is significantly more difficult for anti ballistic countermeasures to predict the missile's path and intercept.
During this stage the missile system makes use of an advanced active homing terminal guidance system to locate its target and plot an accurate attack. An encrypted satellite uplink allows the guidance system to receive targeting information from orbiting satellites, accepting input from both visual imaging and synthetic aperture radar mounted aboard spacecraft. Thorough satellite coverage of the target area effectively ensures the Draconis will be able to track mobile naval platforms and adjust its boost glide to compensate. The guidance system can alternatively receive information from land based sources, such as an over the horizon radar installation (OTH), or mobile radar platforms, such as that mounted aboard an airborne early warning (AEW) aircraft. A radar correlator system compares this data to that gathered from the missile's own radar scans of the target area, to produce a position fix and update the guidance system with steering commands. The guidance system can further receive information from UAVs, or even a soldier manually laser guiding the missile in, though the latter is somewhat unlikely given the intended range of the system. The more intelligence available to the missile, the more likely it is to strike its target with pinpoint precision. If necessary, the missile system can rely on active and passive radar homing to autonomously find and track targets.
Small scattering surfaces, special reflective coatings, and small size projections help to reduce the missile's own radar signature. Electromagnetic spectrum countermeasures are built in to protect the guidance system and prevent radar jamming. Draconis' guidance system additionally makes use of antifragile electronic warfare, in the form of passive radiation homing. Should its radar or other guidance systems be noise jammed, the missile will, if lacking any alternate form of targeting, use the source location of the jamming signal as a target.
Countermeasures against this missile system are largely ineffective. Most ballistic missile interceptors are designed to strike the impending missile during its midcourse stage. The high speed and short midcourse phase of the Draconis mean such a missile would need to be fired almost immediately after the Draconis itself, in order to have sufficient time to intercept before reentry. After reentry the missile is at a marginally too low altitude for exo-atmospheric kill vehicles. Certain missiles are capable of striking after reentry into the atmosphere, but will have to contend with an unpredictable boost glide hypersonic trajectory and a MARV performing extremely high speed evasive maneuvers. Conventional interceptor missiles notably have difficulty against targets moving faster than Mach 5, and the Draconis moves at speeds of Mach 8 or above. Such extreme speed in the final terminal guide renders short range point defence systems of little use. When this speed is combined with the probable late detection of the incoming missile, the relatively small size of the MARV compared with a cruise missile, its erratic maneuvering, and the very small window for interception, there is very little defence against such a strike.
The high kinetic energy and accompanying impact shock, combined with a thermobaric warhead designed to detonate moments after armour penetration inside the hull of the vessel, are expected to cripple, in terms of render unoperational for military purposes, or outright destroy even the largest vessels in a single hit. High speed and a semi armour piercing body allow the missile to easily punch through the deck, where the delayed thermobaric explosion and resulting shockwave utterly devastates the interior of the ship, magnified dramatically by the enclosed space. The missile supports both a very wide range of conventional warheads, which rely on explosive material based on chemical energy, and alternate warheads such as nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.