

by DANIAL2 » Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:51 am


by Neo Philippine Empire » Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:29 am
by Mitheldalond » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:36 am

by Polski Swiety Imperium » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:38 am

by New Aerios » Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:28 pm
"No matter how worthy the cause, it is robbery, theft, and injustice to confiscate the property of one person and give it to another to whom it does not belong"------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Prior to capitalism, the way people amassed great wealth was by looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man. Capitalism made it possible to become wealthy by serving your fellow man."

by The Aspari Syndicate » Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:33 pm

by Dewhurst-Narculis » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:14 pm

by Icatus » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:17 pm

by Eemeria » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:51 pm

by Republic of Coldwater » Fri Feb 07, 2014 12:11 am

by Dewhurst-Narculis » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:59 am

by Pharthan » Fri Feb 07, 2014 10:47 am
Eemeria wrote:OOC: These Flying Aircraft Carriers may not be as unrealistic as you may think. The Eemerian Air Force operates about twelve of these (albeit upgraded due to obvious flaws, some stated by above posts) and they operate quite efficiently. They use some of the same power systems seen in nuclear powered naval vessels which eliminates SOME of the refueling issues. Now yes our nations leans to PMT more so then MT which can lead some MT nations to seeing these as unfeasible. I personally think if the thread was reworked a bit then these items could make much more sense.
HALCYON ARMS STOREFRONT

by Eemeria » Fri Feb 07, 2014 10:57 am
Pharthan wrote:Eemeria wrote:OOC: These Flying Aircraft Carriers may not be as unrealistic as you may think. The Eemerian Air Force operates about twelve of these (albeit upgraded due to obvious flaws, some stated by above posts) and they operate quite efficiently. They use some of the same power systems seen in nuclear powered naval vessels which eliminates SOME of the refueling issues. Now yes our nations leans to PMT more so then MT which can lead some MT nations to seeing these as unfeasible. I personally think if the thread was reworked a bit then these items could make much more sense.
((The nuclear reactors would either have to be very different, or you'd have to carry a lot of water with you and have an efficient way of cooling it quickly.))

by United States of Devonta » Fri Feb 07, 2014 11:02 am
Eemeria wrote:Pharthan wrote:((The nuclear reactors would either have to be very different, or you'd have to carry a lot of water with you and have an efficient way of cooling it quickly.))
ooc: yes as I said. We're more PMT then MT. Technologies different with us. You've seen our love for PMT seeing as you've worked with us before xD. So yes realistically 2014 these wouldn't work.
Ask Devonta a Question/Embassy ProgramUS Air Force E-4Twenty-Three, Male, Lightskin, Social Democrat, Proud Kansan
Proud member of the IFC, SA, IHAPC, IDS, PEDC, IBE, ISA nation!

by Edward Richtofen » Fri Feb 07, 2014 11:03 am
Nationalist State of Knox wrote:It seems like Donald has pulled out his Trump card.
Corrian wrote: I'm freaking Corrian.
Death Metal wrote:By the OP's logic:
-Communists are big fans of capitalism
-Anarchists believe in the necessity of the state
-Vegans fucking love to eat meat.
-Christians actually worship Satan.
-Homosexual men all like to sleep with women.

by Liberated Counties » Fri Feb 07, 2014 11:09 am

by Eemeria » Fri Feb 07, 2014 11:11 am
United States Of Devonta wrote:Eemeria wrote:
ooc: yes as I said. We're more PMT then MT. Technologies different with us. You've seen our love for PMT seeing as you've worked with us before xD. So yes realistically 2014 these wouldn't work.
(Occ: Even in PMT maybe like plus 75 years they won't have flying carriers. For many reasons technology want be they're still. Also the practicality of having one is useless because of the danger and modern air defenses. Any air carrier would be more then easy to shoot down. Lets just say many would die. I don't think we will ever actually see a flying carrier in are lifetime. I'm 15.

by Eemeria » Fri Feb 07, 2014 3:44 pm
Icatus wrote:OOC: Sorry, was I being the troll? I didn't mean to...

by Republic of Coldwater » Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:08 pm
Icatus wrote:OOC: Sorry, was I being the troll? I didn't mean to...

by Marsisian » Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:15 pm

by Mizialand » Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:11 am


by Australian rePublic » Sat Feb 08, 2014 6:38 am
Mitheldalond wrote:How big is it? How many aircraft can it hold? What kinds of aircraft can operate from it? Are there fail safes in place to allow it to land safely if one or more of the rotors are damaged? Where and how can it land? What safety features are there to keep people from falling off or being sucked into the giant rotors? How does the massive airflow and turbulence caused by the rotors affect aircraft takeoff and landing? What kind of fuel does it use? How often does it have to land to refuel? What is its range when fully fueled? What is its operational altitude? Its maximum altitude? What is its top speed? What defenses does it have? Why are they so cheap? Anyone else have any more questions to add?
Advertisement
Return to Global Economics and Trade
Users browsing this forum: GOLTZBORG
Advertisement