PERSONAL COMMUNIQUÉ FROM THE
PRESIDENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC STATES OF EZMWALIATo: Grand Ambassador Peter Nizhinsky of the Free Kingdom of Allanea
Encryption: nonePlease believe me when I say that my aim was not to bismirch the reputation of the Amistad Declaration one jot in my previous personal communiqué. You must understand, my nation is one which has suffered greatly at the hands of oppressors of all kinds, ones overtly bringing enslavement and ones promising peace with one hand and offering chains in the other. You must also understand that my aim in withholding my nation's signature from this document, and calling those within my party to do the same, is not a challenge to the Amistad Declaration's signatories, aims or content.
I am a socialist, Ambassador. I was duly elected by my countrymen, Ezmwalian brothers and sisters, to represent their interests and the interests of the international proletariat. Indeed, when Comrades Desket and Turnov speak of the wage slaver, this is the very same language many in my country would use to describe those who abuse wages and workers for profit. So when Comrades Desket and Turnov speak against the Amistad Declaration, saying it does not achieve the aims of destroying slavery, only changing one's slaver, and does not focus on wage slavery and similar capitalistic forms of oppression, my heart beats with hope and joy. Finally, I might think, a group willing to go further, at the heart of what I and many others see as oppression, and rip it out root and stem.
However, within their paragraphs of critique, no alternate proposal was given. The Amistad Declaration, for its flaws, offers a solution to a form of slavery - international action. It is akin to workers in a union, protesting the conditions of themselves and their fellow peers. For, let us be clear, slavery is the ultimate affront to life. The members of the Fifth International believe that this declaration simply does not go far enough, and Ezmwalia agrees. But the Fifth International offers no alternate solution. Such was my challenge; "action!" They ought to place value in their words, and do against the wage slaver what the Amistad Declaration does against the chattel slaver.
We release this challenge to the Fifth International, rather than, say, taking up the cause ourselves and forming a socialist anti-slavery organisation, mainly due to the fact that the Fifth International is so vocal on this front. For lack of the Fifth International's action, we may indeed form our own anti-slavery organisation, and if it were Ezmwalia's choice, we would see cooperation with the Amistad Declaration's signatories as honourable, in fact possibly encouraging signing of both if our aims do not directly conflict. But assuming the Fifth International has the intention to carry, to its logical conclusion, the words it writes, we shall not take up our challenge ourselves.
There is little the Amistad Declaration could do, short of uniting against wage slavery, which, as Comrades Desket and Turnov point out, it shall not do, which could convince Ezmwalia that it is any more of a fit for our aims. You are against chattel slavery, as are we. The onerous is upon the Fifth International to prove that they have, in hand, a solution to wage slavery. If they cannot do that, then I fully intend to bring Ezmwalia's signature to the Amistad Declaration at last, and join with the group of nations here in their fight against international slavery.
We hope the honourable Ambassador understands our position more clearly, and apologise for any confusion in turn,
President Jordon Mole