Sibirska wrote:Oh i knew that, and I was actually going to post a tread (when I'm done with my intro.) about procuring more eastern weapons (russian style) cause my soldiers are better trained in soviet and other eastern styled weapons. the Serbian company Zastava would be a company which I would consider.
The weapons procured in my military arsenal are mainly Zastava manufactured, I prefer the reliability of eastern small arms over the western NATO ones.
@Cotland
Yes, thank you for making that a clearer message with some good context behind it. I have studied modern history in the Cold War era (in fact I am doing a unit study on the wars within this era at the moment), but when it comes down to the fine details of logistics and ordnance with the NATO and Warsaw pact, that is where things get complicated. After reading Sirbirska's post I looked into the AK-47 series and noticed some researchers have often classed the cartridge of certain Russian assault rifles in NATO classification. I was unsure whether this was correct or not, so thank you for that correction. I am about to complete the final details of my military factbook which I would greatly appreciate your analysis. It is good to see others here specialised in military statistics and detail.




