No I haven't. (What is CAPINTERN?)
And yes we do have a budget, it may be a game but we like to keep it somewhat realistic.
Advertisement

by New Lusitaniagrad » Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:59 pm

by Crontor » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:03 pm

by LOVE DOG » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:06 pm

by LOVE DOG » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:19 pm

by Crontor » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:27 pm

by LOVE DOG » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:29 pm
Crontor wrote:Love Dog wrote:
[OOC: I like it, so it would be cool to leave if you want. But at else you learned a few things about the Cong. A good day's work, I say.]
Yeah, ok, we can leave it, let's just pretend there was an April Fools Day note on the back and we don't go to war as a result. But yes, i did learn a lot. Yet, i am still a padawn...

by New Lusitaniagrad » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:40 pm
Crontor wrote:New Lusitaniagrad wrote:No I haven't. (What is CAPINTERN?)
And yes we do have a budget, it may be a game but we like to keep it somewhat realistic.
It is a pro capitalist alliance that is being threatened by the Serkovaya (or what whatever the hell it is called) pact and Bok wanted to intervene. That is actually why he had me send the Cong the treaty, to ensure that they wouldn't intervene in the war.

by Crontor » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:46 pm
New Lusitaniagrad wrote:Crontor wrote:It is a pro capitalist alliance that is being threatened by the Serkovaya (or what whatever the hell it is called) pact and Bok wanted to intervene. That is actually why he had me send the Cong the treaty, to ensure that they wouldn't intervene in the war.
Post a link.

by Cartavesqa » Sun Jan 30, 2011 9:08 pm
Crontor wrote:71,284,514,120.00
Our new budget only taking into account members listed in the opening post.
I say we hire some sort of applications manager, who takes note of applications.

by Laneige » Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:00 am
Laneige wrote:I had read the charter and there is no articles relating to the issue of under what circumstances a nation is classified as a provisional member. So I guess I can only ask. *shrugs*

by St George of England » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:33 am
St George of England wrote:Full Battalion of the UPACommand Squad
One Colonel, armed with FN Five-Seven (extended 30 round magazine)
One Command Radio Operator, armed with SA80
One Sniper, armed with FN FNAR
One Medic, armed with SA80
Two Support Gunners, armed with M4 Carbine
Platoon Command Squad
One Captain, armed with FN Five-Seven and M4 Carbine
One Command Radio Operator, armed with SA80
One Sniper, armed with FN FNAR and FN P90
One Medic, armed with SA80
Two Support Gunners, armed with M4 Carbine
First Combat Squad
One Sergeant, armed with M4 Carbine
One Radio Operator, armed with SA80
Eight Soldiers, armed with M4 Carbines
Two Mortar Operators, armed with SA80s and L9A1 51 mm Light Mortar
Second Combat Squad
One Sergeant, armed with M4 Carbine
One Radio Operator, armed with SA80
Eight Soldiers, armed with M4 Carbines
Two Mortal Operators, armed with SA80s and L9A1 51 mm Light Mortar
Special Support Unit
Twelve Support Gunners armed with M4 Carbines
OR
Twelve Snipers armed with FN FNARs
OR
One Machine Gun Commander armed with M4 Carbine
Three Heavy Machine Gun Crews of three men, armed with SA80 and operating FN Minimis (or MK 48s)
Two Support Gunners armed with M4 Carbines
Heavy Support Unit
Six Ammunition Bearers, armed with FN P90
Six Shooters, armed with Benelli M4 Shotguns and XM25 Grenade Launchers
OR
One Mortar Commander, armed with M4 Carbine
Three Mortar Crews of three men, armed with FN P90 and operating Mortier 120mm Rayé Tracté Modèle F1
One Automatic Grenade Launcher Crew of two men, armed with SA80s and operating XM307 Advanced Crew Served Weapon
Scout Party
One Radio Operator Sergeant, armed with SA80
Four Snipers, armed with FN FNARs
Light Tank
Two Stryker Mobile Gun Systems
Total Strength
65 men, 2 TanksCommand Squad
One Colonel, armed with FN Five-Seven (extended 30 round magazine)
One Command Radio Operator, armed with SA80
One Sniper, armed with FN FNAR
One Medic, armed with SA80
Two Support Gunners, armed with M4 Carbine
Platoon Command Squad
One Captain, armed with FN Five-Seven and M4 Carbine
One Command Radio Operator, armed with SA80
One Sniper, armed with FN FNAR and FN P90
One Medic, armed with SA80
Two Support Gunners, armed with M4 Carbine
First Combat Squad
One Sergeant, armed with M4 Carbine
One Radio Operator, armed with SA80
Eight Soldiers, armed with M4 Carbines
Two Mortar Operators, armed with SA80s and L9A1 51 mm Light Mortar
Second Combat Squad
One Sergeant, armed with M4 Carbine
One Radio Operator, armed with SA80
Eight Soldiers, armed with M4 Carbines
Two Mortal Operators, armed with SA80s and L9A1 51 mm Light Mortar
Special Support Unit
Twelve Support Gunners armed with M4 Carbines
OR
Twelve Snipers armed with FN FNARs
OR
One Machine Gun Commander armed with M4 Carbine
Three Heavy Machine Gun Crews of three men, armed with SA80 and operating FN Minimis (or MK 48s)
Two Support Gunners armed with M4 Carbines
Heavy Support Unit
Six Ammunition Bearers, armed with FN P90
Six Shooters, armed with Benelli M4 Shotguns and XM25 Grenade Launchers
OR
One Mortar Commander, armed with M4 Carbine
Three Mortar Crews of three men, armed with FN P90 and operating Mortier 120mm Rayé Tracté Modèle F1
One Automatic Grenade Launcher Crew of two men, armed with SA80s and operating XM307 Advanced Crew Served Weapon
Scout Party
One Radio Operator Sergeant, armed with SA80
Four Snipers, armed with FN FNARs
Light Tank
Two Stryker Mobile Gun Systems
Total Strength
65 men, 2 TanksArtillery Contingent
6 Panzerhaubitze 2000s each with 5 men per vehicle.
6 M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System vehicles with 3 crew.
Main Battle Arm
One Leopard 2S Command Tank
Seven Leopard 2A5 Tanks
Cavalry/Tactical Arm
One Puma IVF
Two Boxer APCs
Total Strength
Twelve Tanks
324 Men, inc. tank crews.
12 Artillerypieces
14 Tanks
I've increased each squad size by two. Imperial measurements seemed more appropriate.

by Bokaya » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:52 am
Urgolon wrote:Because liberals like buying computers made by corporations, running on software developed by corporations, to open up an internet browser made by a corporation, to search on a search engine run by a corporation, to find a forum so they can rant about how they hate the evil corporations.The Black Plains wrote:But Canada is America's hat.

by New Lusitaniagrad » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:49 am

by Aquilinia » Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:10 am

by St George of England » Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:19 am
New Lusitaniagrad wrote:I have been in contact with the leader of the procap alliance since last night when I heard about it. I have offered the support of the pact to them. And since I am a Chairman in the IC we may have the CPA and the Sovereign Empires Coalition help us out.
In any case it is vital that we get the UPDC up to speed. At the very least we should know who many troops, jets, and AFVs we have.

by New Lusitaniagrad » Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:55 am

by Bokaya » Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:22 am
Urgolon wrote:Because liberals like buying computers made by corporations, running on software developed by corporations, to open up an internet browser made by a corporation, to search on a search engine run by a corporation, to find a forum so they can rant about how they hate the evil corporations.The Black Plains wrote:But Canada is America's hat.

by New Lusitaniagrad » Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:48 am


by St George of England » Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:37 am




.jpg)


by Millsa » Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:03 pm
New Lusitaniagrad wrote:I have been in contact with the leader of the procap alliance since last night when I heard about it. I have offered the support of the pact to them. And since I am a Chairman in the IC we may have the CPA and the Sovereign Empires Coalition help us out.
In any case it is vital that we get the UPDC up to speed. At the very least we should know who many troops, jets, and AFVs we have.
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: Arin Graliandre
Advertisement