Unkerlantum wrote:and what about my second question
I suppose we all just forget it and move on. Seems best.
And to Lizardiar, I'd prefer a bit more thought to go into applications and acceptance into CAG from now on then.
Advertisement

by Revolvisia » Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:33 pm
Unkerlantum wrote:and what about my second question

by Chetssaland » Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:36 pm
Revolvisia wrote:Unkerlantum wrote:and what about my second question
I suppose we all just forget it and move on. Seems best.
And to Lizardiar, I'd prefer a bit more thought to go into applications and acceptance into CAG from now on then.

by Lizardiar » Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:42 pm
Chetssaland wrote:Revolvisia wrote:Unkerlantum wrote:and what about my second question
I suppose we all just forget it and move on. Seems best.
And to Lizardiar, I'd prefer a bit more thought to go into applications and acceptance into CAG from now on then.
agreed. We dont need to vote, because people just like having people. We just need to discuss it and reach a verdict.


by Chetssaland » Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:50 pm
Lizardiar wrote:
Why do we take away the member's choice?

by N3wgr0unds » Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:24 pm
Chetssaland wrote:Lizardiar wrote:
Why do we take away the member's choice?
Because people will still just vote for anybody. I think a discussion amongst members is better than a vote for this.
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: Hundredstar
Advertisement