Northern Eagle Military Alliance (MT; OPEN)

by **Sailsia** » Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:59 pm

New Azura wrote:Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls! I put a lot of work into this project, and I sincerely hope that you all enjoy the fruits of my labor (no pun intended). We can use this thread as a FAQ/Q & A session for current NEMA members who have questions about format, structure, etc. To wit, you WILL need to fill out a new application for the new alliance, so be prepared for that!

Without further ado...

NEMA-X

Wow, and it was the 1000th post too...

Very Special indeed. I want to make my application special, so it won't be posted for a little while.

by **Altimaea** » Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:13 pm

You mean I was 1 post away from having the 1000th post? :eek:

I think its a sign!

by **Slazenagara** » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:45 am

Sorry I'm a bit late but I also think that NEMA-X should be a seperate thing from Judea, Judea can just be a place we stay so that we can discuss Alliance matters and so that we are all together and not complicating things.

by **Unilisia** » Wed Oct 06, 2010 5:49 am

Slazenagara wrote:Sorry I'm a bit late but I also think that NEMA-X should be a seperate thing from Judea, Judea can just be a place we stay so that we can discuss Alliance matters and so that we are all together and not complicating things.

Judea and NEMA are nowhere near one in the same.

by **New Azura** » Wed Oct 06, 2010 5:54 am

Unilisia wrote:
Slazenagara wrote:Sorry I'm a bit late but I also think that NEMA-X should be a seperate thing from Judea, Judea can just be a place we stay so that we can discuss Alliance matters and so that we are all together and not complicating things.

Judea and NEMA are nowhere near one in the same.

Yeah, but there was a lot of confluence there too, historically speaking.

by **Unilisia** » Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:03 am

New Azura wrote:
Unilisia wrote:
Judea and NEMA are nowhere near one in the same.

Yeah, but there was a lot of confluence there too, historically speaking.

More synonymous-ness.

Also, I stopped talking in the other thread, so you should be telling SLAZ to shush now, not me.

by **New Azura** » Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:21 am

Unilisia wrote:
New Azura wrote:
Yeah, but there was a lot of confluence there too, historically speaking.

More synonymous-ness.

Also, I stopped talking in the other thread, so you should be telling SLAZ to shush now, not me.

Well, I went ahead and counted your vote of approval in the IRC as a motion to vote him in, and I went ahead and seconded the motion and voted Yea also to speed things up. However, with some new nations in the queue and the alliance starting to take off, I'll be asking nations to use the outline given in the NEMA-X thread.

For all nations that are going to be in NEMA-X, or applying, here's how it works one more time (it's not complicated, but I want to clarify anyways). Once your application is cleared, you'll be placed in the voting queue. I'll take the first cleared application in line and link to it in the NEMA-X thread. The membership of NEMA-X then discusses any questions they may have with one another about the applicant.

When a nation is ready to vote, they say "I motion that [insert nation] is now voted on." If another nation feels the same way, they say "I second the motion." Once a motion is seconded, all the members of the alliance have seven days to vote. If the applicant gets one more than half of the votes as YEA, they're in. Otherwise, they're not. The same deal goes for Prospects; the person that is ready to vote says "I motion that [insert nation] is voted on as a Prospect." If another nation feels the same way, they say "I second the motion".

The only way this will get confusing is if we don't stick to it. Once a few nations get into the alliance in this manner, it will become easy to remember.

by **Slazenagara** » Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:55 pm

Well we should start discussing the next few applicant's. I have had a look at Castleclose's application and it seems quite good but I had a look at his Roleplays and I see this as his main weakness.

by **Castleclose** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:09 am

Slazenagara wrote:Well we should start discussing the next few applicant's. I have had a look at Castleclose's application and it seems quite good but I had a look at his Roleplays and I see this as his main weakness.

I think this is supposed to go in the other NEMA thread....

by **Ewa beach** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:13 pm

So....what exactly is going to happen to this thread? Are we just supposed to let it die?

by **Bondashk** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:42 pm

Nation Name: The confederacy of united independent Bondashk states.
Nation's form of government: Confederation
Nation's population: is it all right to RP? if so a population of 53 million
Nation's military size: 400,000
Relations with Members of NEMA: None
Sample RP: I have none yet
Do you support communism? Its a fair system but gets screwed up by people.
Do you support nazism? No
Do you wish to join the Judean League (You will have to join Judea) ? Clarification please
Will you stay devoted to this alliance and all members within it? Yes

by **Solm** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:13 pm

Bondashk wrote:Nation Name: The confederacy of united independent Bondashk states.
Nation's form of government: Confederation
Nation's population: is it all right to RP? if so a population of 53 million
Nation's military size: 400,000
Relations with Members of NEMA: None
Sample RP: I have none yet
Do you support communism? Its a fair system but gets screwed up by people.
Do you support nazism? No
Do you wish to join the Judean League (You will have to join Judea) ? Clarification please
Will you stay devoted to this alliance and all members within it? Yes

There is a new thread for the alliance, which is described at the top of this page.

by **Tergnitz** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:31 pm

Ewa beach wrote:So....what exactly is going to happen to this thread? Are we just supposed to let it die?

Mod lock?

by **Slazenagara** » Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:16 pm

That is probably the only way to stop people from posting applications in this thread as we have just seen like 2 posts up :lol:

by **Altimaea** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:22 pm

WTF that bondashk dude has only 6 mill people.

by **Teccor** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 4:51 pm

Whoa, where'd NEMA-X come from? I personally think it's somewhat X-Men-like, reminiscient of Malcom-X, and otherwise just plain silly.

Also: Holy Complex Alliance Applications, Batman!

by **Unilisia** » Fri Oct 08, 2010 5:28 pm

Teccor wrote:Whoa, where'd NEMA-X come from? I personally think it's somewhat X-Men-like, reminiscient of Malcom-X, and otherwise just plain silly.

Also: Holy Complex Alliance Applications, Batman!

No, just no.

by **Ewa beach** » Mon Oct 11, 2010 4:06 pm

So guys, as New Azura stated in the NEMA-X thread, and as he stated on the IRC: We are to take over the NEMA-X thread, but he also said that the current thread is just a sample thread, so we need to make a new, real thread.

Now, up on the IRC, we're having trouble finding an OP. So...discuss.

by **Unilisia** » Mon Oct 11, 2010 4:08 pm

Ewa beach wrote:So guys, as New Azura stated in the NEMA-X thread, and as he stated on the IRC: We are to take over the NEMA-X thread, but he also said that the current thread is just a sample thread, so we need to make a new, real thread.

Now, up on the IRC, we're having trouble finding an OP. So...discuss.

On the IRC, now :evil:

by **Castleclose** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:26 pm

Unilisia wrote:
Ewa beach wrote:So guys, as New Azura stated in the NEMA-X thread, and as he stated on the IRC: We are to take over the NEMA-X thread, but he also said that the current thread is just a sample thread, so we need to make a new, real thread.

Now, up on the IRC, we're having trouble finding an OP. So...discuss.

On the IRC, now

Wow. We have an IRC?

Northern Eagle Military Alliance (MT; OPEN)

Who is online