Will that always be true?
Advertisement
by Heldervin » Sun Apr 14, 2024 5:18 am
by European Federal Union » Sun Apr 14, 2024 5:19 am
by Heldervin » Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:57 am
by European Federal Union » Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:58 am
by New Heldervinia » Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:59 am
by European Federal Union » Tue Apr 16, 2024 11:41 am
by Heldervin » Tue Apr 16, 2024 12:20 pm
European Federal Union wrote:How would the world react if the EFU took another 10% of Heldervin?
by Southeast Marajarbia » Tue Apr 16, 2024 12:51 pm
European Federal Union wrote:How would the world react if the EFU took another 10% of Heldervin?
by European Federal Union » Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:36 am
by Heldervin » Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:38 am
European Federal Union wrote:As a explination, a bunker burster is a heavy bomb ussally dropped from a high altitude. Its designed to dug itself into the ground, and then explode near bunkers, to (depending on warhead) cause entire bunker systems with reinforced tunnels to collapse
by European Federal Union » Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:44 am
Heldervin wrote:European Federal Union wrote:As a explination, a bunker burster is a heavy bomb ussally dropped from a high altitude. Its designed to dug itself into the ground, and then explode near bunkers, to (depending on warhead) cause entire bunker systems with reinforced tunnels to collapse
Oh... But you have to keep in mind, being PMT, it is perfectly possible to build the tunnels deeper. Also, I said that some of them evacuated to nearby nations.
Also, why, oh why, must the EFU be obsessed with destroying Heldervin!?
by New Heldervinia » Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:48 am
European Federal Union wrote:Heldervin wrote:Oh... But you have to keep in mind, being PMT, it is perfectly possible to build the tunnels deeper. Also, I said that some of them evacuated to nearby nations.
Also, why, oh why, must the EFU be obsessed with destroying Heldervin!?
Yes, its perfectly reasonable for PMT to build deeper tunnels, tho vice versa its also perfectly reasonable for PMT to have bunker bursters which can penetrate more soil and reach deeper (I mean the during the Iraq war, it took just a month for Uncel Sam to develop a bunker buster which turned nearly all Iraqi command bunkers obsolete.)
Its more about undermining foreign influence in the region, and well Heldervin is a risk to the integrity ot EFU Heldervin so a weaker Heldervin is better.
Also dont worry, im not planning to take any more territory for myself, I will instead give the task of turning Heldervin into a proper nation state to another nation. Tho while retreating out of Heldervin, I will proly plunder what has been temporarily occupied during this war while pulling out troops
by European Federal Union » Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:53 am
New Heldervinia wrote:Is your nation a hub of technology? Heldervin is. AND WHO IN TARNATION IS UNCLE SAM!?
And how is Heldervin a risk to the integrity of the EFU? And finally, I would not like to end up having to roleplay a nation that is forever shattered and has no military. At least not for a long time. The only difference in date is 35 years.
And if I understand right, East Heldervin will stay occupied, right?
by New Heldervinia » Wed Apr 17, 2024 1:03 pm
European Federal Union wrote:New Heldervinia wrote:Is your nation a hub of technology? Heldervin is. AND WHO IN TARNATION IS UNCLE SAM!?
And how is Heldervin a risk to the integrity of the EFU? And finally, I would not like to end up having to roleplay a nation that is forever shattered and has no military. At least not for a long time. The only difference in date is 35 years.
And if I understand right, East Heldervin will stay occupied, right?
Yup, tho not just from the perspective of NS states or because I said so but because I do spend quite alot of time, or rather include what I learn from day to day research into my nation.
Not the EFU itself, but rather its colony east heldervin. And I mean after this I will be done with Heldervin, as long as it does not choose any direct action against the EFU or its colonies I will be doing no offensive acts.
Yes
by European Federal Union » Wed Apr 17, 2024 1:13 pm
New Heldervinia wrote:I still don't see how Heldervin poses a risk to the integrity of East Heldervin. That would be more so a militaristic threat. And, given that the occupied zone didn't necessarily rebel against Heldervin, it wouldn't necessarily be militarily be attacked.
by New Heldervinia » Wed Apr 17, 2024 1:16 pm
European Federal Union wrote:New Heldervinia wrote:I still don't see how Heldervin poses a risk to the integrity of East Heldervin. That would be more so a militaristic threat. And, given that the occupied zone didn't necessarily rebel against Heldervin, it wouldn't necessarily be militarily be attacked.
I mean, at this point its prolx diffirent perspectives why you dont see how its treatened
tho i dont really understand the second statment, i also dont understand what you are saying about which side
by Assassins BrotherHoodd » Wed Apr 17, 2024 1:16 pm
by European Federal Union » Wed Apr 17, 2024 1:18 pm
by New Heldervinia » Wed Apr 17, 2024 1:22 pm
Assassins BrotherHoodd wrote:Tiger tank.
by European Federal Union » Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:59 pm
New Heldervinia wrote:Well, I mean that Heldervin, with a military, would pose more so a risk to East Heldervin, since A) the Superior Monarchy would likely expand the highway network to improve army movement (ICly, you shouldn't know that) and B) we're right next to them.
by European Federal Union » Fri Apr 19, 2024 5:09 am
by New Heldervinia » Fri Apr 19, 2024 6:43 am
European Federal Union wrote:Could I get a response to the invasion?
by European Federal Union » Fri Apr 19, 2024 6:50 am
by New Heldervinia » Fri Apr 19, 2024 7:02 am
European Federal Union wrote:New Heldervinia wrote:Which invasion?
There
viewtopic.php?p=41520353#p41520353
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: Arakhkhar, Canturk, East side lakes
Advertisement