Zarnicovia nova wrote:Makko Oko wrote:"For the most part, we're in favor with the proposed amendments to the CIS's Constitution, but if I may voice my suggestion, 4b has a repetitive statement, 'judges shall judge and manage' when it could be, 'judges shall mediate and manage'. This is to limit the scope of power for judges, as to prevent ripe abuse. Also, we think the Military Commissioner has too much power when it comes to the 'moderate power over nation's operations' portion, we prefer to run our military our way, but accepted support we would oblige."
"As for East Acornesian, if they are a full CIS member, we approve assistance as such"
"The Judge's objective is enforce the constitution to make sure that no abuses by resolutions, members or commissioners occur. They must have power to give out punishment and veto resolutions. They are the democratic replacement of the current powers given undemocratically to the founders.
If a CIS effort is to officially occur in a war then the military commissioner will be called to appoint a front commander(Like 5 star generals from WW2) and aid said front commander. Front commanders will organize CIS troops in said war in gaining objectives set out by the PC or General Assembly."
“What ‘punishments’ would the judges be able to dole out? Also, how are the Judges appointed? The Constitution currently only provides the appointment process for the Commissioners. Are the Judges counted under that?”