Yerevan Summit (KTO-GCN Peace Talks|OOC|Invite-only)

by **Romanic Imperium** » Tue May 24, 2022 11:12 am

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:
Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Galapagos isn’t allowed to join. He's violated god knows how many treaties and that's only resulted in, well, a lot. Aquaria literally just told me the same thing.

Tell me one time I violated a treaty without a good reason. And no using convenient loopholes isnt a violation but a big brain move

Still a violation

by **Biladu Al Rafidayn** » Tue May 24, 2022 11:14 am

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:
Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Galapagos isn’t allowed to join. He's violated god knows how many treaties and that's only resulted in, well, a lot. Aquaria literally just told me the same thing.

Tell me one time I violated a treaty without a good reason. And no using convenient loopholes isnt a violation but a big brain move

Invading me

by **The Military State of the Galapagos** » Tue May 24, 2022 11:14 am

Romanic Imperium wrote:
The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Tell me one time I violated a treaty without a good reason. And no using convenient loopholes isnt a violation but a big brain move

Still a violation

Can't call it a violation if there is no rule against it

by **The Military State of the Galapagos** » Tue May 24, 2022 11:16 am

Biladu Al Rafidayn wrote:
The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Tell me one time I violated a treaty without a good reason. And no using convenient loopholes isnt a violation but a big brain move

Invading me

There was no NAP in any of the treaties that didnt involve me being swindled by a certain Meretica

by **Biladu Al Rafidayn** » Tue May 24, 2022 11:21 am

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:
Biladu Al Rafidayn wrote:Invading me

There was no NAP in any of the treaties that didnt involve me being swindled by a certain Meretica

The tricking bits were not about the NAP. You agreed to that.

by **Aursi** » Tue May 24, 2022 12:06 pm

Aursi wrote:Like whats the Update. Am I allowed to join?? Mets-Hayk and Janpia??

Armenia, am I allowed to join or not?

by **Kingdom Of The UN** » Tue May 24, 2022 12:08 pm

The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:
Romanic Imperium wrote:
Still a violation

Can't call it a violation if there is no rule against it

"Ron Raeburn would take over a fascist he would sponsor public works projects giving people jobs and fixing the economy, he would also ignore the original peace treaty"

That seems like violating a treaty

Didn't hear it from me

by **The Military State of the Galapagos** » Tue May 24, 2022 12:48 pm

Kingdom Of The UN wrote:
The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Can't call it a violation if there is no rule against it

"Ron Raeburn would take over a fascist he would sponsor public works projects giving people jobs and fixing the economy, he would also ignore the original peace treaty"

That seems like violating a treaty

Didn't hear it from me

That was Galapagos Peace Treaty and that only happened because SO decided to blockade me and threaten my national sovereignty

by **Mets Hayk** » Tue May 24, 2022 1:19 pm

Aursi wrote:
Aursi wrote:Like whats the Update. Am I allowed to join?? Mets-Hayk and Janpia??

Armenia, am I allowed to join or not?

I'd prefer if only those I listed in the OP participated.

by **Aursi** » Tue May 24, 2022 1:20 pm

Mets Hayk wrote:
Aursi wrote:Armenia, am I allowed to join or not?

I'd prefer if only those I listed in the OP participated.

Thanks for responding

by **Southeast Marajarbia** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:14 pm

Guys, I know I'm not OP, but can you please stop trying to spread bias and false accusations about my leader? Please? It's seriously something that will ruin the peace talks which are supposed to be neutral. The ongoing topic was about regular war criminals and not forcing leaders to attend trials for shit they never did.

by **Zarnicovia nova** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:18 pm

Southeast Marajarbia wrote:Guys, I know I'm not OP, but can you please stop trying to spread bias and false accusations about my leader? Please? It's seriously something that will ruin the peace talks which are supposed to be neutral. The ongoing topic was about regular war criminals and not forcing leaders to attend trials for shit they never did.

NGL The way your rep is Defending him makes him sound like a dunce.
:rofl:

by **Janpia** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:18 pm

Southeast Marajarbia wrote:Guys, I know I'm not OP, but can you please stop trying to spread bias and false accusations about my leader? Please? It's seriously something that will ruin the peace talks which are supposed to be neutral. The ongoing topic was about regular war criminals and not forcing leaders to attend trials for shit they never did.

viewtopic.php?p=39172868#p39172868

viewtopic.php?p=39208520#p39208520

as well as the will of Emperor Jackson and the might of the Federation

by **Southeast Marajarbia** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:19 pm

Janpia wrote:
Southeast Marajarbia wrote:Guys, I know I'm not OP, but can you please stop trying to spread bias and false accusations about my leader? Please? It's seriously something that will ruin the peace talks which are supposed to be neutral. The ongoing topic was about regular war criminals and not forcing leaders to attend trials for shit they never did.

viewtopic.php?p=39172868#p39172868

viewtopic.php?p=39208520#p39208520

Still, could you not try and ruin neutral peace talks?

by **Janpia** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:20 pm

Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Janpia wrote:
viewtopic.php?p=39172868#p39172868

viewtopic.php?p=39208520#p39208520

Still, could you not try and ruin neutral peace talks?

I am simply asking to put Jackson on trial. How is that bias?

by **Southeast Marajarbia** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:21 pm

Janpia wrote:
Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Still, could you not try and ruin neutral peace talks?

I am simply asking to put Jackson on trial. How is that bias?

Well, if you succeed, I would have to ask to put your leader on trial to make things more fair. And to that I just want to ask how that might make you feel?

by **Janpia** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:22 pm

Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Janpia wrote:
I am simply asking to put Jackson on trial. How is that bias?

Well, if you succeed, I would have to ask to put your leader on trial to make things more fair. And to that I just want to ask how that might make you feel?

Who? Yorischa? Tell me what did she do? I have proof of Emperor Jackson.

Im fine with a trial. With actual basis.

by **Southeast Marajarbia** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:24 pm

Janpia wrote:
Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Well, if you succeed, I would have to ask to put your leader on trial to make things more fair. And to that I just want to ask how that might make you feel?

Who? Yorischa? Tell me what did she do? I have proof of Emperor Jackson.

Im fine with a trial. With actual basis.

Hopefully now you realize some of the complications. One leader being put on trial means the other will have to be too, you know? Can't really do that unless forced to.

by **Zarnicovia nova** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:25 pm

Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Janpia wrote:
Who? Yorischa? Tell me what did she do? I have proof of Emperor Jackson.

Im fine with a trial. With actual basis.

Hopefully now you realize some of the complications. One leader being put on trial means the other will have to be too, you know? Can't really do that unless forced to.

He said he is ok with a trial

by **Janpia** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:26 pm

Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Janpia wrote:
Who? Yorischa? Tell me what did she do? I have proof of Emperor Jackson.

Im fine with a trial. With actual basis.

Hopefully now you realize some of the complications. One leader being put on trial means the other will have to be too, you know? Can't really do that unless forced to.

I provided basis. Provide one for Yorischa

by **Southeast Marajarbia** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:27 pm

Janpia wrote:
Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Hopefully now you realize some of the complications. One leader being put on trial means the other will have to be too, you know? Can't really do that unless forced to.

I provided basis. Provide one for Yorischa

Not saying I would ask to put her on trial, but I will if I am forced to put mine on trial. Now, let's just move on and continue with this conference.

by **Janpia** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:29 pm

Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Janpia wrote:
I provided basis. Provide one for Yorischa

Not saying I would ask to put her on trial, but I will if I am forced to put mine on trial. Now, let's just move on and continue with this conference.

As I said, basis. You cant put someone innocent just for someone that has a legitimate crime on trial. How is that even neutral?

Either way, Emperor Jackson has suspicious background and needs to be on trial. Yorischa? Drag her out forcefully if you want. If you can. It will just make you look bad for dragging an innocent on trial and with no basis

by **Zarnicovia nova** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:31 pm

Janpia wrote:
Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Not saying I would ask to put her on trial, but I will if I am forced to put mine on trial. Now, let's just move on and continue with this conference.

As I said, basis. You cant put someone innocent just for someone that has a legitimate crime on trial. How is that even neutral?

Either way, Emperor Jackson has suspicious background and needs to be on trial. Yorischa? Drag her out forcefully if you want. If you can. It will just make you look bad for dragging an innocent on trial and with no basis

Innocent until proven guilty can. neutrality by assumption of fair trial

by **Southeast Marajarbia** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:32 pm

Janpia wrote:
Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Not saying I would ask to put her on trial, but I will if I am forced to put mine on trial. Now, let's just move on and continue with this conference.

As I said, basis. You cant put someone innocent just for someone that has a legitimate crime on trial. How is that even neutral?

While I would appreciate it if we just moved on, like to just respond to the bolded part. It would be neutral primarily because of the relationship, more specifically, it's me vs. you, Marajarbia vs. Janpia, two rivals leading two large alliances that are known to oppose each other. You can't have neutrality until things are perfectly balanced, in a manner of speaking. You understand where I am going with this?

by **Zarnicovia nova** » Wed May 25, 2022 6:34 pm

Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Janpia wrote:
As I said, basis. You cant put someone innocent just for someone that has a legitimate crime on trial. How is that even neutral?

While I would appreciate it if we just moved on, like to just respond to the bolded part. It would be neutral primarily because of the relationship, more specifically, it's me vs. you, Marajarbia vs. Janpia, two rivals leading two large alliances that are known to oppose each other. You can't have neutrality until things are perfectly balanced, in a manner of speaking. You understand where I am going with this?

Isn’t this negotiations going ULIBOR

Yerevan Summit (KTO-GCN Peace Talks|OOC|Invite-only)

Who is online