Advertisement

by Global Alliance-Military » Wed Oct 27, 2021 2:59 pm
The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Global Alliance-Military wrote:
Why do you keep coming up with false anti-GA stuff? As far as I'm concerned things between GA and NATO are a bit shaky, but are nowhere near war. Besides, for the GA to actually go to war, we need an act that a simple majority needs to pass, and we haven't even voted on anything yet.
In addition, both GA co-founders are also members with NATO.
It's mainly my fault, but also partially the faults of you, Meretica, and Vikanias, in the sense that the GA hasn't really been established as an alliance yet, and you guys chose to start a massive conflict 1-2 days into its founding.
I think it's best for me to just make it so the GA never existed until 5-10 minutes from now when I create the threads, because the GA was unable to do anything to begin with. Among other things, it would mean that the Galapagos would be a UCA protectorate until 5-10 minutes from now, then be changed into a transitional GA protectorate until we hold the votes on stuff, but I think it would be realistic since UCA actually had a military before it joined the GA, and therefore could be an actual GLA enemy.
I kinda thought you were one of the people screwing me over

by Southeast Marajarbia » Wed Oct 27, 2021 2:59 pm
Global Alliance-Military wrote:The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:I almost dragged NATO and the GA into a war because NATO didn’t realize they were supporting terrorists
Why do you keep coming up with false anti-GA stuff? As far as I'm concerned things between GA and NATO are a bit shaky, but are nowhere near war. Besides, for the GA to actually go to war, we need an act that a simple majority needs to pass, and we haven't even voted on anything yet.
In addition, both GA co-founders are also members with NATO.
It's mainly my fault, but also partially the faults of you, Meretica, and Vikanias, in the sense that the GA hasn't really been established as an alliance yet, and you guys chose to start a massive conflict 1-2 days into its founding.
I think it's best for me to just make it so the GA never existed until 5-10 minutes from now when I create the threads, because the GA was unable to do anything to begin with. Among other things, it would mean that the Galapagos would be a UCA protectorate until 5-10 minutes from now, then be changed into a transitional GA protectorate until we hold the votes on stuff, but I think it would be realistic since UCA actually had a military before it joined the GA, and therefore could be an actual GLA enemy.
EDIT: Basically, the GA was never involved in any conflicts that occurred before the Wuscoegroan Invasion, which hasn't happened yet.

by Southeast Marajarbia » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:03 pm
Deblar wrote:Any international businesses interested in leasing tenant space in my skyscraper?

by Global Alliance-GA » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:08 pm
Southeast Marajarbia wrote:Global Alliance-Military wrote:
Why do you keep coming up with false anti-GA stuff? As far as I'm concerned things between GA and NATO are a bit shaky, but are nowhere near war. Besides, for the GA to actually go to war, we need an act that a simple majority needs to pass, and we haven't even voted on anything yet.
In addition, both GA co-founders are also members with NATO.
It's mainly my fault, but also partially the faults of you, Meretica, and Vikanias, in the sense that the GA hasn't really been established as an alliance yet, and you guys chose to start a massive conflict 1-2 days into its founding.
I think it's best for me to just make it so the GA never existed until 5-10 minutes from now when I create the threads, because the GA was unable to do anything to begin with. Among other things, it would mean that the Galapagos would be a UCA protectorate until 5-10 minutes from now, then be changed into a transitional GA protectorate until we hold the votes on stuff, but I think it would be realistic since UCA actually had a military before it joined the GA, and therefore could be an actual GLA enemy.
EDIT: Basically, the GA was never involved in any conflicts that occurred before the Wuscoegroan Invasion, which hasn't happened yet.
I guess, so that means that the handover will happen the minute the threads are posted, right?

by Southeast Marajarbia » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:09 pm

by The Military State of the Galapagos » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:09 pm

by Southeast Marajarbia » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:11 pm

by The Military State of the Galapagos » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:12 pm

by Deblar » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:13 pm
The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
You need an autonomous Parliamentary system, no? That’s the whole point of GA in regards to colonies and protectorates, giving them independence slowly with autonomy given first.
I’m sure this won’t backfire horribly and lead to another civil war in the Galapagos due to the fact that the people (and me) have a burning desire to see the GA fall under nuclear ash

by The Military State of the Galapagos » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:15 pm

by Global Alliance-GA » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:16 pm
The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Definitely and the GLF is America

by Gonswanza » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:18 pm
[GNN] Check [hyperlink blocked] for further instructions or [frequency blocked]. /// Finland holds off Russian advance, Baltic sea turned into a "bathtub from hell". /// Strange signals from space, likely a dysfunctional probe /// New body armor rolling off the line, onto Gonswanzan soldiers /// Canada declares war against the US after a bloody coup. /// Japan deploys infantry to Korea, post-unification.

by Global Alliance-Military » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:25 pm

by Meretica » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:25 pm

by Global Alliance-Military » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:26 pm

by The Military State of the Galapagos » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:45 pm

by Global Alliance-Military » Wed Oct 27, 2021 3:46 pm
All of the urban areas and a large part of the rural areas hate us [GA], while another large part of the rural areas supports us [GA].

by The Military State of the Galapagos » Wed Oct 27, 2021 4:02 pm
Global Alliance-Military wrote:Galapagos, need your public approval or rejection of this.All of the urban areas and a large part of the rural areas hate us [GA], while another large part of the rural areas supports us [GA].
EDIT: Looks like you posted. Not bad luck.

by Global Alliance-Military » Wed Oct 27, 2021 4:12 pm
The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Global Alliance-Military wrote:Galapagos, need your public approval or rejection of this.All of the urban areas and a large part of the rural areas hate us [GA], while another large part of the rural areas supports us [GA].
EDIT: Looks like you posted. Not bad luck.
Honestly I don’t think anybody likes you except for the small groups of immigrants and after the handover of the Galapagos to the GA your last supporters turned to moderates

by Southeast Marajarbia » Wed Oct 27, 2021 4:13 pm
Global Alliance-Military wrote:The Military State of the Galapagos wrote:Honestly I don’t think anybody likes you except for the small groups of immigrants and after the handover of the Galapagos to the GA your last supporters turned to moderates
Part of the GA's founding promises was to help improve the income and quality of life of rural communities, and since we have a large amount of members, I'm sure at least some people in rural communities would recognize our promises as realistic and support us. They are just promises, but we intend to fulfill them.
Also, the handover of the Galapagos to the GA just happened officially, though unofficially it won't happen until after your elections. I don't see how a handover turns supporters into moderates.

by The Military State of the Galapagos » Wed Oct 27, 2021 4:16 pm
Southeast Marajarbia wrote:Global Alliance-Military wrote:
Part of the GA's founding promises was to help improve the income and quality of life of rural communities, and since we have a large amount of members, I'm sure at least some people in rural communities would recognize our promises as realistic and support us. They are just promises, but we intend to fulfill them.
Also, the handover of the Galapagos to the GA just happened officially, though unofficially it won't happen until after your elections. I don't see how a handover turns supporters into moderates.
Actually, technically the elections just ended due to both the LibComs and Liberal Capitalists agreeing on combining their votes into one, which means victory.

by Global Alliance-Military » Wed Oct 27, 2021 4:19 pm
Southeast Marajarbia wrote:Global Alliance-Military wrote:
Part of the GA's founding promises was to help improve the income and quality of life of rural communities, and since we have a large amount of members, I'm sure at least some people in rural communities would recognize our promises as realistic and support us. They are just promises, but we intend to fulfill them.
Also, the handover of the Galapagos to the GA just happened officially, though unofficially it won't happen until after your elections. I don't see how a handover turns supporters into moderates.
Actually, technically the elections just ended due to both the LibComs and Liberal Capitalists agreeing on combining their votes into one, which means victory.

by Southeast Marajarbia » Wed Oct 27, 2021 4:23 pm
Global Alliance-Military wrote:Southeast Marajarbia wrote:
Actually, technically the elections just ended due to both the LibComs and Liberal Capitalists agreeing on combining their votes into one, which means victory.
We do have to consider how we're going to handle the Galapagos. Maybe a combination of economic subsidization (especially in employment), regular tax cuts, security funding, and discouragement (but no ban) of increasing the population via childbirth. If inflation becomes a problem, destruction of some money that lands in GA hands might be necessary to fight it.

by Global Alliance-Military » Wed Oct 27, 2021 5:16 pm
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: Laka Strolistandiler, Southeast Marajarbia
Advertisement