Tsuru Mawere listened intently to the speeches that succeeded him. Wilton-Smyth, Jung, Rozak, and many others had relatively uninteresting speeches: sure, they were diverse, but there was not a single thing that he could latch on to.
But then there was Chancellor Otto von Hösslin. While Von Hösslin's speech seemed relatively uncontroversial at first, two sentences in his speech caught his attention: Von Hösslin had managed to accuse Coius of single-handedly causing this problem of climate change, and on proposing "stricter policies" on Coian development.
That was unacceptable to Mawere, and quite presumably, to all of the developing nations situated across the Coian continent. To allow Euclea to continue profiting off of the mines and other mineral resources on Coius, while denying Coians the right to determine their own path to the future, struck a nerve with him. Even if Wilton-Smyth may privately express these same thoughts, at least he can be convinced that it was directed at the socialists. Not so with Von Hösslin.
After all the opening speeches were concluded, and Yuan made his remarks to help steer the summit in a certain direction, Mawere was free to respond.
"Your excellencies," Mawere began. "while we need to acknowledge that the northern nations in Euclea and the Asterias should bear the bulk of the costs to helping the world transition to sustainable development, we need to look at ourselves as well: just because Euclea and Asteria followed a certain path to the standards of living that they enjoy today does not mean that we must commit ourselves on that same path."
"I believe that nations who have committed themselves to this path of development, particularly Xiaodong and Zorasan, should also commit some funds: not as much as the northerners, to be sure, but they should contribute at least some money to help ensure that their economies transition to a new world where climate change can be halted," Mawere said. "For nations who are beginning to develop, who are beginning to see their economies grow, it is prudent, in my opinion, for the poorest of the poor to not pay a single cent."
"Instead, nations that are beginning to develop, like Mabifia, like Masari, like Yemet, or yes, even my beloved Rwizikuru, should learn from the mistakes of others. We must abandon this notion that we should emulate the development of Euclea and Asteria to achieve these standards of living: we must instead commit to sustainable development, so that we can live a better life for our children, without pushing our world over the brink. Contrary to what some may say, it is possible to undergo sustainable development on a national scale, especially if we poor nations learn from the mistakes of others.."
"On this note, it is clear that we need a bank to help developing nations like my own, like Zorasan, Xiaodong, and many others, to help transition to this new economy," Mawere declared. "However, I firmly disagree with Chairman Yuan's assertion about the Global Institute for Fiscal Affairs' role in this proposed bank."
"These policies have proven successful in instituting economic growth in countries that have embraced it: Sivartha, Caldia, Werania, Etruria, just to name a few. Meanwhile, countries who failed to embrace neoliberalism, like my own, did not see as strong of a growth between 1980 and 2005, suggesting that economic liberalism is the only way out of this crisis," Mawere said. "There have been reports of innovations which can be used to reduce the effects on climate change on nations that need it most, and it would be very inappropriate for nations to acquire loans from the fund, only for the money to be spent on a jetplane for their ruler."
"Thus, I feel that the rules that the Global Institute for Fiscal Affairs have set out would ensure a balance between economic development and environmental protection, which would help improve the world for the benefit of the people, and not the privileged elite," Mawere concluded.
But then there was Chancellor Otto von Hösslin. While Von Hösslin's speech seemed relatively uncontroversial at first, two sentences in his speech caught his attention: Von Hösslin had managed to accuse Coius of single-handedly causing this problem of climate change, and on proposing "stricter policies" on Coian development.
That was unacceptable to Mawere, and quite presumably, to all of the developing nations situated across the Coian continent. To allow Euclea to continue profiting off of the mines and other mineral resources on Coius, while denying Coians the right to determine their own path to the future, struck a nerve with him. Even if Wilton-Smyth may privately express these same thoughts, at least he can be convinced that it was directed at the socialists. Not so with Von Hösslin.
After all the opening speeches were concluded, and Yuan made his remarks to help steer the summit in a certain direction, Mawere was free to respond.
"Your excellencies," Mawere began. "while we need to acknowledge that the northern nations in Euclea and the Asterias should bear the bulk of the costs to helping the world transition to sustainable development, we need to look at ourselves as well: just because Euclea and Asteria followed a certain path to the standards of living that they enjoy today does not mean that we must commit ourselves on that same path."
"I believe that nations who have committed themselves to this path of development, particularly Xiaodong and Zorasan, should also commit some funds: not as much as the northerners, to be sure, but they should contribute at least some money to help ensure that their economies transition to a new world where climate change can be halted," Mawere said. "For nations who are beginning to develop, who are beginning to see their economies grow, it is prudent, in my opinion, for the poorest of the poor to not pay a single cent."
"Instead, nations that are beginning to develop, like Mabifia, like Masari, like Yemet, or yes, even my beloved Rwizikuru, should learn from the mistakes of others. We must abandon this notion that we should emulate the development of Euclea and Asteria to achieve these standards of living: we must instead commit to sustainable development, so that we can live a better life for our children, without pushing our world over the brink. Contrary to what some may say, it is possible to undergo sustainable development on a national scale, especially if we poor nations learn from the mistakes of others.."
"On this note, it is clear that we need a bank to help developing nations like my own, like Zorasan, Xiaodong, and many others, to help transition to this new economy," Mawere declared. "However, I firmly disagree with Chairman Yuan's assertion about the Global Institute for Fiscal Affairs' role in this proposed bank."
"These policies have proven successful in instituting economic growth in countries that have embraced it: Sivartha, Caldia, Werania, Etruria, just to name a few. Meanwhile, countries who failed to embrace neoliberalism, like my own, did not see as strong of a growth between 1980 and 2005, suggesting that economic liberalism is the only way out of this crisis," Mawere said. "There have been reports of innovations which can be used to reduce the effects on climate change on nations that need it most, and it would be very inappropriate for nations to acquire loans from the fund, only for the money to be spent on a jetplane for their ruler."
"Thus, I feel that the rules that the Global Institute for Fiscal Affairs have set out would ensure a balance between economic development and environmental protection, which would help improve the world for the benefit of the people, and not the privileged elite," Mawere concluded.