Great war of the Countries Pt.4 OOC Signups Disabled.

by **Draos** » Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:02 pm

we had given him over a dozen chances and he never changed. I would like to inform everyone I have stepped down from active RPing for personal reasons but I will stick around to enforce the rules .

by **Dyllonia** » Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:07 pm

Draos wrote:No.

Regardless, we should still hold a vote

by **Draos** » Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:09 pm

Dyllonia wrote:
Draos wrote:No.

Regardless, we should still hold a vote

No Dyllonia we shouldn't Suryak doesn't deserve to be back no offense to you but he never grew up and kept trying to skirt the rules whenever he could.

by **Oppermenia** » Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:16 pm

Draos wrote:
Dyllonia wrote:Regardless, we should still hold a vote

No Dyllonia we shouldn't Suryak doesn't deserve to be back no offense to you but he never grew up and kept trying to skirt the rules whenever he could.

Draos, if I may digress, Suryak I feel has learned his lesson. Having to watch us have the fun without being able to do it himself. I feel he has grown.
You don’t know this, but awhile ago, he was running his own RP, and he was actually doing pretty good running things. I think he has grown as an rper, and feel he deserves at least one more shot. If he does what he used to do, then fine. We ban him again. But if we see he’s changed, then we let him continue to RP. And I always felt you were too hard on Suryak, because he had gotten to the point where he was annoying you at the same time as all this stuff you were dealing with, so you took that stress out on him.
I just say we give him one more chance, and see how he does.

by **Draos** » Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:19 pm

No. I don't think we should how many times have I heard give him one more chance? I'VE GIVEN HIM A DOZEN CHANCES I'm not giving him more.

by **Oppermenia** » Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:25 pm

Draos wrote:No. I don't think we should how many times have I heard give him one more chance? I'VE GIVEN HIM A DOZEN CHANCES I'm not giving him more.

I feel he’s learned his lesson. One more chance, and he’s done. I can promise you that. I just think we should give him that, and I feel he’s grown since you’ve banned him.
Listen, this is your RP at the moment, I get it. I will respect that.
Me and Dyllonia are going to be running a separate RP at some point, and maybe there we can let Suryak RP, proove his worth, and if he does fine, then whoever is the OP of pt. 5 can accept him, and he will be on probation. If he can make it through pt. 5 without breaking the rules, then he can be pardoned.
Does this sound fair?

by **Draos** » Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:33 pm

in your RPs you can do what you want but I'm tired of being asked to put up with him when he clearly refuses to learn.

by **Oppermenia** » Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:38 pm

Draos wrote:in your RPs you can do what you want but I'm tired of being asked to put up with him when he clearly refuses to learn.

And I respect that, Draos, your RP your rules.

by **South Acren** » Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:25 am

Draos wrote:No.

Figured you'd say that. Hence why he is allowed in my other RP.

Forum posting history · by **Big Gunz Interweb** » Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:04 am

Hello I am kind of new to um roleplaying I have never done International Incidents may I join?

by **South Acren** » Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:08 am

Big Gunz Interweb wrote:Hello I am kind of new to um roleplaying I have never done International Incidents may I join?

Well, I doubt it. The OP of this thread doesnt like new people. I can give you the link to my thread if you want...

Forum posting history · by **Big Gunz Interweb** » Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:21 am

South Acren wrote:
Big Gunz Interweb wrote:Hello I am kind of new to um roleplaying I have never done International Incidents may I join?

Well, I doubt it. The OP of this thread doesnt like new people. I can give you the link to my thread if you want...

Oh wow yes I would love to see it thank you (:

by **South Acren** » Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:39 am

Big Gunz Interweb wrote:wow yes I would love to see it thank you (:

No prob
Link here:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=449733

by **Oppermenia** » Sat Sep 29, 2018 3:50 pm

Hey guys I’m writing an issue. It’s about a monarchist nation wanting to unify with your nation. It’s like the different ways you could unify, and an option to reject the unification. But, should this get accepted, that would mean there would be a way to install a constitutional monarchy, and for some people here that are monarchies like Draos and Mersdon and Persia and of course me, then this could be a cool issue.
If anyone wants to critique it, then here’s the link:
https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=450789

by **Persia-Kebabistan** » Sat Sep 29, 2018 6:24 pm

Oppermenia wrote:Hey guys I’m writing an issue. It’s about a monarchist nation wanting to unify with your nation. It’s like the different ways you could unify, and an option to reject the unification. But, should this get accepted, that would mean there would be a way to install a constitutional monarchy, and for some people here that are monarchies like Draos and Mersdon and Persia and of course me, then this could be a cool issue.
If anyone wants to critique it, then here’s the link:
https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=450789

It seems good to me, there are no visible mistakes. However, I am bad at critiquing works of writing, so my opinion may not be of much help.

by **Persia-Kebabistan** » Sat Sep 29, 2018 6:27 pm

BTW, Oppermenia, the website will not let me respond to your telegrams, so if it's cool with you, I will post my responses here so you can read them (I will avoid spoilers).

by **Oppermenia** » Sat Sep 29, 2018 6:32 pm

Persia-Kebabistan wrote:BTW, Oppermenia, the website will not let me respond to your telegrams, so if it's cool with you, I will post my responses here so you can read them (I will avoid spoilers).

Alright.
Why won’t it let you reply?

by **Persia-Kebabistan** » Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:50 am

Oppermenia wrote:
Persia-Kebabistan wrote:BTW, Oppermenia, the website will not let me respond to your telegrams, so if it's cool with you, I will post my responses here so you can read them (I will avoid spoilers).

Alright.
Why won’t it let you reply?

When I send the telegrams, the game says "Oppermenia does not accept telegrams from you," so maybe it has something to do with telegram settings.

Regarding your first tg about the Illuminati being corrupt, I made it this way so their hypocrisy would be obvious and then people will not support them.

About the second tg, I htink the idea you mentioned in it, which I will not spoil here, is a good idea.

by **Oppermenia** » Sun Sep 30, 2018 8:56 am

Persia-Kebabistan wrote:
Oppermenia wrote:Alright.
Why won’t it let you reply?

When I send the telegrams, the game says "Oppermenia does not accept telegrams from you," so maybe it has something to do with telegram settings.

Regarding your first tg about the Illuminati being corrupt, I made it this way so their hypocrisy would be obvious and then people will not support them.

About the second tg, I htink the idea you mentioned in it, which I will not spoil here, is a good idea.

For some reason, I had you on my ignore list. Don’t know how that happened. I took you off, though, so you should be able to reply to my telegrams now.

by **Oppermenia** » Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:28 pm

Okay, here's an issue draft I wrote for nations that want to play as constitutional monarchies (so quite a few of us):
https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=450969

by **South Caleblan** » Sat Dec 22, 2018 5:05 am

Im back!

by **Persia-Kebabistan** » Sat Dec 22, 2018 7:45 pm

South Caleblan wrote:Im back!

Hello SC! There is a new thread now, it is called The Wolf and the Eagle: Clash of the Superpowers, which is basically GWOTC 6. Signups might be open, but I am not completely sure.

Great war of the Countries Pt.4 OOC Signups Disabled.

Who is online