Shrillland wrote:Our Nation is now taking a more proactive approach to ending slavery.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=77759
Actively supporting terrorism is a marvelous way to find yourself ostracized or invaded.
Advertisement

by Des-Bal » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:55 am
Shrillland wrote:Our Nation is now taking a more proactive approach to ending slavery.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=77759
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Menassa » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:58 am

by Des-Bal » Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:04 am
Menassa wrote:If you look in my factbook in my sig there is my slavery policy what is wrong with this policy?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by The Floor Kippers » Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:09 am

by The Floor Kippers » Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:10 am

by Des-Bal » Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:12 am
The Floor Kippers wrote:You two troublemakers, Schtoom.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by The Floor Kippers » Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:14 am

by Des-Bal » Mon Nov 01, 2010 6:21 am
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by The Floor Kippers » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:33 am
Des-Bal wrote:
How so? When have I been anything but the voice of reason and moderation, are you perhaps frightened by the concept of a well posed opposing argument that doesn't consist of irrational hatred? Without a moral high-ground do you find your arguments somehow lacking?

by Des-Bal » Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:49 am
The Floor Kippers wrote:My Hatred of Slavery is anything but irrational, As for the Moral High ground, May one enquire what do you know of the Moral High ground?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Mediterreania » Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:07 pm
Des-Bal wrote:The Floor Kippers wrote:My Hatred of Slavery is anything but irrational, As for the Moral High ground, May one enquire what do you know of the Moral High ground?
Again you misunderstand, I submit that my presence offends because my arguments in favor of slavery are based around sound logical and moral principles. As you are unable to form an appropriate argument you respond with groundless hostility. As for the Moral High Ground I know that it is ridiculous and contingent on the fallacious reasoning that morals are black and white with no regard for cultural or ethical differences.

by Teccor » Mon Nov 01, 2010 1:29 pm
Des-Bal wrote:The Floor Kippers wrote:My Hatred of Slavery is anything but irrational, As for the Moral High ground, May one enquire what do you know of the Moral High ground?
Again you misunderstand, I submit that my presence offends because my arguments in favor of slavery are based around sound logical and moral principles. As you are unable to form an appropriate argument you respond with groundless hostility. As for the Moral High Ground I know that it is ridiculous and contingent on the fallacious reasoning that morals are black and white with no regard for cultural or ethical differences.
Zetion wrote:Fuck PETA, my meat tastes better knwoing they dont want me to eat it.
Marquesan wrote:Furthermore, a news flash. This just in from the department of pancakes: F*ck waffles.

by Des-Bal » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:17 pm
Mediterreania wrote:Dehumanizing someone and turning their life into a commodity to be bought and sold is an absolute moral wrong. The slaveowner has destroyed the slave in ways worse than death. Not only that, but the potential of the slave is wasted. While there is cheap manual labor, the enslaved may have had talents that could have contributed to humankind if it was not for their condition.
Check and mate.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Des-Bal » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:27 pm
Teccor wrote:Arguing in favor of slavery is arguing in favor of an action that disregards and denies basic human rights to a group of people.
Slavery, denying human rights to anyone, is always immoral by any standard, and morality must be disregarded completely before the "logical" arguments even come into play. Therefore, any argument you have regarding "morality" is invalidated.
Better luck next time.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Royal Calathonia » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:32 pm

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:33 pm
Mediterreania wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
Again you misunderstand, I submit that my presence offends because my arguments in favor of slavery are based around sound logical and moral principles. As you are unable to form an appropriate argument you respond with groundless hostility. As for the Moral High Ground I know that it is ridiculous and contingent on the fallacious reasoning that morals are black and white with no regard for cultural or ethical differences.
Dehumanizing someone and turning their life into a commodity to be bought and sold is an absolute moral wrong. The slaveowner has destroyed the slave in ways worse than death. Not only that, but the potential of the slave is wasted. While there is cheap manual labor, the enslaved may have had talents that could have contributed to humankind if it was not for their condition.
Check and mate.

by The Floor Kippers » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:36 pm
Royal Calathonia wrote:To: The leaders of the World Anti-Slavery Organization
From: The Empire of Royal Calathonia
Sirs and Madames,
I believe that slavery is a horrible and restricting practice, used against men who are born by God to be free. Slavery restricts their liberties and subjects them to horrible, brutal practices of mistreatment. Nations who practice, endorse, or promote slavery are committing a crime against humanity, a crime against international law, a natural crime, and a crime against God. They should be diplomatically condemned, and should not be viewed favorably by the international community. Royal Calathonia itself is anti-slavery, hoping to promote freedom across the planet. In accordance with our views, I, Catherine II, Empress of Royal Calathonia donate 1,000 medics, 3,000 rescue workers, 500 reporters, and $2 billion Royal Calathonian Marks in funds to the WASO Organization. May you use it wisely, and for freedom.
Signed,
Empress Catherine II

by Osthia » Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:19 pm

by Des-Bal » Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:21 pm
Osthia wrote:De to our rising economy, we wish to donate 5 billion Osthian Dollars to our wonderful organization, in the hopes that the money is used to buy slaves and make them free, or perhaps, to help WASO in any other financial way.
Sincerely,
Emperor Arathor I
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by The Rich Port » Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:22 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Osthia wrote:De to our rising economy, we wish to donate 5 billion Osthian Dollars to our wonderful organization, in the hopes that the money is used to buy slaves and make them free, or perhaps, to help WASO in any other financial way.
Sincerely,
Emperor Arathor I
Wouldn't it be significantly less stupid to buy the slaves yourself? WASO has an abysmal track record of hoarding money, honestly there should be an investigation to potential corruption in it's chairs.
It's Denecaep, for Chrissakes. What's he gonna do, buy golden armchairs or something like that?
by Osthia » Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:23 pm

by The Floor Kippers » Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:23 pm
Osthia wrote:De to our rising economy, we wish to donate 5 billion Osthian Dollars to our wonderful organization, in the hopes that the money is used to buy slaves and make them free, or perhaps, to help WASO in any other financial way.
Sincerely,
Emperor Arathor I

by Des-Bal » Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:25 pm
Osthia wrote:Well, no one has a thread for me to buy slaves, so...this is the only way to do it.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: Federal republic of Socialsts, Ferrum Hills, Latgallia, Relikai, Second Peenadian, The Astral Mandate
Advertisement