Haishan wrote:Vistora wrote:Liquid metal-cooled? That's a component of the IFR's design, is it not? Considering your level of advancement, I would expect that the IFR would be within your purview.
We just use tokamak-style magnetic confinement D-T fusion for about 85% of our grid. The rest is wind, solar, and a few other renewable sources that exist moreso for research than power provision.
Yes, liquid metal-cooled reactors. Amongst the lines of FLiBe, IFR, fast neutron and such. I generally term it as liquid-metal cooled reactor considering different designs have different usages. A fast neutron design would be useful for a submarine but not so for civilian which demands separate requirements. If all, I chose liquid metal cooled-reactor for its safety benefit, i.e no Chernobyl meltdown for example. Then because generic liquid metal cooled reactors are perfectly MT (Alfa's reactor comes into mind and so is MSR Experiment).
My answer is in terms on telling a transitional phase considering the switch wouldn't happen immediately as tech progresses. There might be some old tech there and there as newer ones get introduced. As for level of advancement, I don't really classify Haishan to be measurable in such metrics or whatever since it's not useful to me.
As for tokamak so you went big risk, big power, big fusion eh. I bet on polywell fusor since it's several times cheaper than the lines of JET/ITER. Then there's also Lockheed Martin's CFR but its consistent operation feasibility is questionable for now.
Ehe, I changed it to stellarator after remembering that I had decided it was the better option of the two. Polywells seemed to have a lot of trouble reaching net energy production, especially on a large scale, while the CFR was just too nebulous to base much off of, as you mentioned.