Advertisement

by Tekeristan » Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:52 am

by Flauc » Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:57 am

by Significance » Fri Apr 22, 2016 12:13 pm

by Significance » Fri Apr 22, 2016 1:00 pm

by Caracasus » Sat Apr 23, 2016 5:43 am
Flauc wrote:So basically, all of that happens but you won't be posting a lot anymore?
Oh well, bugger.
Anyways, time to begin destroying Karthos.
Carcasus, what would your reaction be if a Carcasus citizen died in Karthos as part of the communist support mission? Is it condemnation? Because to be realistic, you can't be angry at, let's say Flauc, if we accidentally/on purpose hurt a Carcasus citizen - after all, he is in a war zone/disputed territory.

by Significance » Sat Apr 23, 2016 1:01 pm

by Flauc » Sat Apr 23, 2016 1:02 pm

by Significance » Sat Apr 23, 2016 1:11 pm
Flauc wrote:I don't think Wattersville should be chosen because they will most likely not allow you to use guns, and I don't think any world leader would go to a meeting with no security in his mind.
Well, Nan Jiwa could host it, but we would also use our position as the host nation against everyone else.

by Flauc » Sat Apr 23, 2016 1:14 pm

by Watersville » Sat Apr 23, 2016 1:15 pm
Significance wrote:I cant post anymore about Peace and company till I know what's happening to the meeting. While I know tek wishes for someone to carry on the process, it seems no on wishes to take the reins. While some may suggest I'd be an excellent candidate, I feel my agenda would not be best for a meeting where we are trying to solve problems, not create them.
My personal vote therefore goes to Watersville. For while not many trust them (just going to say I personally trust them) they would want peace on the penisular, which is the driving force for discussion. Tek also would likely trust Watersville, as they both are trying to supply aid on the penisular, and peacefully.
This doesn't mean Waterville has to do the meeting, but tek could be said to of asked them to do it, and then watersville decides the next move.
What's everyone else's thoughts on the matter and why?

by Significance » Sat Apr 23, 2016 1:22 pm
Watersville wrote:I think that you have a good idea, however, I will warn you that guns are strictly forbidden for everyone, and I mean everyone. Also, like you said, there are many who do not trust me, so we feel that meetings in Watersville wouldn't nessesarily bring anything to the situation.

by Cardulan » Sun Apr 24, 2016 1:59 am
Flauc wrote:I don't think Wattersville should be chosen because they will most likely not allow you to use guns, and I don't think any world leader would go to a meeting with no security in his mind.
Well, Nan Jiwa could host it, but we would also use our position as the host nation against everyone else.

by Significance » Sun Apr 24, 2016 5:01 am
Cardulan wrote:Flauc wrote:I don't think Wattersville should be chosen because they will most likely not allow you to use guns, and I don't think any world leader would go to a meeting with no security in his mind.
Well, Nan Jiwa could host it, but we would also use our position as the host nation against everyone else.
This sounds very good. Your delegates will not get assassinated if the summit does not take place in Watersville, because in Watersville only criminals have guns. If the summit does take place in Flauc Cardulan can participate.

by Caracasus » Sun Apr 24, 2016 7:23 am
Flauc wrote:Can someone explain to why were the Jesuits expelled? Are they affected by something similar to antisemitism?

by Flauc » Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:32 am

by Caracasus » Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:43 am
Flauc wrote:There we go.
When nations begin posting their attendances, we will have a.. uhh... communist cleaning campaign. We brush them with 'soap' and 'clean them up'.
I don't know if it will count as a war crime in this RP (specifically, a war crime in the conflict), but that is that.

by Tekeristan » Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:47 am


by Significance » Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:50 am
Flauc wrote:There we go.
When nations begin posting their attendances, we will have a.. uhh... communist cleaning campaign. We brush them with 'soap' and 'clean them up'.
I don't know if it will count as a war crime in this RP (specifically, a war crime in the conflict), but that is that.

by Flauc » Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:51 am


by Significance » Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:00 am
Tekeristan wrote:Tarnishing nonetheless.

by Tekeristan » Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:08 am
Significance wrote:Tekeristan wrote:Tarnishing nonetheless.
Well I don't hate you. You can be assured Significance will try to take the pressure off you, if only to put it on Parsoh to take them out.
While communism is frowned upon by us, if you are democratic we will happily look the other way. Significance prides itself on democracy, and freedom to choose, with capitalism seen as a symbol of that choice.

by Flauc » Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:10 am
Tekeristan wrote:Significance wrote:
Well I don't hate you. You can be assured Significance will try to take the pressure off you, if only to put it on Parsoh to take them out.
While communism is frowned upon by us, if you are democratic we will happily look the other way. Significance prides itself on democracy, and freedom to choose, with capitalism seen as a symbol of that choice.
Tekeri is very democratic and has a large capitalist market,
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement