
by Hardenburgh » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:22 pm

by NS Gregaria » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:41 pm
Senestrum wrote:Well, we can always throw some rocks if we really have to...

by Hardenburgh » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:43 pm

by Northwest bohemia » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:48 pm

by Hiedenburgh-Hardenburg » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:52 pm

by NS Gregaria » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:53 pm
Senestrum wrote:Well, we can always throw some rocks if we really have to...

by NS Gregaria » Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:15 pm
Senestrum wrote:Well, we can always throw some rocks if we really have to...

by Hardenburgh » Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:21 pm

by Reich1 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:23 pm

by NS Gregaria » Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:28 pm
Senestrum wrote:Well, we can always throw some rocks if we really have to...

by Reich1 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:37 pm
NS Gregaria wrote:IC:
Reich1's terms are those of barbarians seeking to levy tribute. The ability to take what you please, as you please? Forcible land removal? Perhaps it is you who should have been attacked. Your citizens voting in their election? Unacceptable bullshit. Nations such as yours are too dangerous.
~ Mr. John C. Rooke

by Hardenburgh » Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:48 pm

by Reich1 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:08 pm
Hardenburgh wrote:Here are the amendments we have decided to make
ARMY:-
-10,000 untrained soldiers (and a 500 reserve force) - we agree with this , in principle , however , the force should be highly trained and effective
-100 tanks - older less advanced vehicles
-300 vehicle's (land rovers , hummers , trucks ...) - yep thats fine
-10 transport helicopters - could we increase this to 20 - we see Bohemia supporting our regional operations
-a ban should be placed on attack helicopters until further notice. - good idea , they can be pesky little buggers
- 10 Maritime patrol aircraft - yep , could this even be increased to 20
- 20 transport aircraft - what about 50 , I fancy a free ride for my armed forces
- No fighters or bombers should be allowed until further notice. - yep
- 2 patrol frigates - yep
- 3 corvettes (once again , designed for patrol missions and border protection) - yep
- 2 auxiliaries (designed to support the navy in its mission) - yep
- 10 Augusta Westlands - that seems fine to me
- 1,000 marines - yes , they can complement the ground forces in the event of war
- LSD banned until further notice. - yes
- Submarines banned until further notice - thats fine
-Aircraft carriers banned until further noticeYep, we will review this decision in 30 years
- Nukes and agent orange banned for ever.yep , and it means that if they start manufacturing them we invade
- Any weapons which Bohemia if holds now which excedes the limit should be distributed to all of us.Agree , we need to rebuild our stockpiles anyway
- Stop their weapons manufacturing and start supplying their armed forces ourselves (which they will pay for)Provides some business for us and we can limit the size
- Ban anti-Aircraft defenses , so if they do attack again , bombing is made easy
Reparations:-
- 7000 billion have to be paid by Bohemia to us (And then will de distributed) If Hardenburgh is going to support this , cancel interest , otherwise its too much money
Goverment:-
- All of us will rule Bohemia for a year and as they want every one will get 1 turn.No , lets not do that ,we can set up a new cabinet with politicians we have chosen
- Embassy will be set up in Bohemia which will have right to question government decisions and government may not hold any secrets from our embassy.Thats more like it , before passing any legislation they can report to us
- All of our citizens will have right to vote in there all elections.thats taking it too far , and the elections would become a over long process - how about banning the political parties we dont like
PRODUCTION:-
1. Each of our allies will take what they want from Bohemia .no, no , no - we can't do that , we need to help rebuild the country we don't want to make the population want revenge - that could mean another war
2. During our rule of 5years 80% of total resource and production of Bohemia will be of ours.A) no rule , were not imperialists B) they should hand over materials , what about a more reasonable figure 40%?
3. After that we will get 10% of the total production and resource for next 30 years.I agree with that
LAND:-
- 30% of the total land of Bohemia will be distributed between all of us. Or , we create a set of Autonomous republics out of it , which are our satellite states /colonies/protectorates with their own administrative powers
- Our troops will be able to cross Bohemia with out any trouble forever.We should maintain a combined presence of 50,000 soldiers
- No resistance movement should be there in country.why we should maintain a presence of 50,000 soldiers
Foreign Relationships:-
- Will not be allowed to declare war on us.good idea
-we determine who they can forge alliances with
-If one of us goes to war , they support us in every way
-They do not align themselves with our enemies

by NS Gregaria » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:09 pm
Reich1 wrote:NS Gregaria wrote:IC:
Reich1's terms are those of barbarians seeking to levy tribute. The ability to take what you please, as you please? Forcible land removal? Perhaps it is you who should have been attacked. Your citizens voting in their election? Unacceptable bullshit. Nations such as yours are too dangerous.
~ Mr. John C. Rooke
IC:
The terms I have laid are completely Fair and is just. It is a bit too harsh because of huge death on both sides the safety is the most important. Northwest bohemia have surrendered now but tomorrow it may declare war on us. At that time it will be another bloody war killing millions of people on both sides. So terms I laid will keep this peace long team. With out military Northwest bohemia wont attack us. And the treaty had been harsh due to fact that "Northwest bohemia" didn't surrendered till last moment which is the part when most death occurred. This terms may be harsh now but it will keep peace for ever.
-Futher Of Reich1
Senestrum wrote:Well, we can always throw some rocks if we really have to...

by Reich1 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:16 pm
NS Gregaria wrote:Reich1 wrote:NS Gregaria wrote:IC:
Reich1's terms are those of barbarians seeking to levy tribute. The ability to take what you please, as you please? Forcible land removal? Perhaps it is you who should have been attacked. Your citizens voting in their election? Unacceptable bullshit. Nations such as yours are too dangerous.
~ Mr. John C. Rooke
IC:
The terms I have laid are completely Fair and is just. It is a bit too harsh because of huge death on both sides the safety is the most important. Northwest bohemia have surrendered now but tomorrow it may declare war on us. At that time it will be another bloody war killing millions of people on both sides. So terms I laid will keep this peace long team. With out military Northwest bohemia wont attack us. And the treaty had been harsh due to fact that "Northwest bohemia" didn't surrendered till last moment which is the part when most death occurred. This terms may be harsh now but it will keep peace for ever.
-Futher Of Reich1
I have a sneaking suspicion justice is not so much on your mind as profit, my friend. Perhaps you should be excluded from this summit, if you can not behave like a civilized nation should.
~ Mr. John C. Rooke

by NS Gregaria » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:20 pm
Reich1 wrote:NS Gregaria wrote:Reich1 wrote:NS Gregaria wrote:IC:
Reich1's terms are those of barbarians seeking to levy tribute. The ability to take what you please, as you please? Forcible land removal? Perhaps it is you who should have been attacked. Your citizens voting in their election? Unacceptable bullshit. Nations such as yours are too dangerous.
~ Mr. John C. Rooke
IC:
The terms I have laid are completely Fair and is just. It is a bit too harsh because of huge death on both sides the safety is the most important. Northwest bohemia have surrendered now but tomorrow it may declare war on us. At that time it will be another bloody war killing millions of people on both sides. So terms I laid will keep this peace long team. With out military Northwest bohemia wont attack us. And the treaty had been harsh due to fact that "Northwest bohemia" didn't surrendered till last moment which is the part when most death occurred. This terms may be harsh now but it will keep peace for ever.
-Futher Of Reich1
I have a sneaking suspicion justice is not so much on your mind as profit, my friend. Perhaps you should be excluded from this summit, if you can not behave like a civilized nation should.
~ Mr. John C. Rooke
I am not thinking about profit nor about justice. I know I am not doing justice. But it is about long lasting peace I am concerned about. Even though my terms is unjust, it will bring long lasting peace between us. The summit name is PEACE summit not JUSTICE summit.
Senestrum wrote:Well, we can always throw some rocks if we really have to...

by Reich1 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:23 pm
NS Gregaria wrote:
That, sir, is where you are wrong. You will serve only to infuriate and agitate the Bohemians, sowing the seeds which will becomes a new military conflict. All because you want to deprive a people of self-determination, and lay claim to land which is not yours.
~ Mr. John C. Rooke

by Almaniania » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:30 pm
Reich1 wrote:NS Gregaria wrote:
That, sir, is where you are wrong. You will serve only to infuriate and agitate the Bohemians, sowing the seeds which will becomes a new military conflict. All because you want to deprive a people of self-determination, and lay claim to land which is not yours.
~ Mr. John C. Rooke
Thats where you have got huge wrong. How can a country with so low military start a war ? I would be quite amazed if a nation with that less military start a war and win. And if there is no chance of wining why will nation start a war?

by Reich1 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:17 pm
Almaniania wrote:Reich1 wrote:NS Gregaria wrote:
That, sir, is where you are wrong. You will serve only to infuriate and agitate the Bohemians, sowing the seeds which will becomes a new military conflict. All because you want to deprive a people of self-determination, and lay claim to land which is not yours.
~ Mr. John C. Rooke
Thats where you have got huge wrong. How can a country with so low military start a war ? I would be quite amazed if a nation with that less military start a war and win. And if there is no chance of wining why will nation start a war?
If I make a small suggestion...
having the loser pay reparations would be murderous to their economy.
I recently read a book called World War 2
In it, a country named Germany lost the First World War. They had to pay reparations. Extreme nationalism followed, and then an evil man named Adolf Hitler came to power and help cause WW2.
Now... what is so different about this from World War 2?

by Lazermaz » Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:31 am
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: German-Eurpean Union, Imperial-Octavia, Ixania, Krow-Bock, Mareyland, Warhaven
Advertisement