This is a democracy correct?
Advertisement

by SHADOW Corporation » Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:11 pm

by Almaniania » Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:13 pm

by Puff-Puff-Pass Land » Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:14 pm

by East Fancainia » Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:17 pm
Puff-Puff-Pass Land wrote:Ah, libertarianism, or:
I have the freedom to be rich and you have the freedom to starve poor.

by American Capitalist » Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:23 pm
Puff-Puff-Pass Land wrote:Ah, libertarianism, or:
I have the freedom to be rich and you have the freedom to starve poor.

by Almaniania » Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:39 pm

by SHADOW Corporation » Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:43 pm
Almaniania wrote:The Coalition Defense Council has been formed!
The amendment will be added tomorrow!
Also, Hegstoria is now the Supreme Commander of the Coalition Defense Force.

by Almaniania » Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:46 pm

by Ganicia » Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:06 am
East Fancainia wrote:http://i954.photobucket.com/albums/ae21/bobmc12/GreatNepal1.jpg

by Hiedenburgh-Hardenburg » Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:51 am

by Ganicia » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:16 am
Hiedenburgh-Hardenburg wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=40549&p=1771455#p1771455
attention all CoNS(ers) , Hardenburgh needs our help

by Hegstoria » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:24 am
Hiedenburgh-Hardenburg wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=40549&p=1771455#p1771455
attention all CoNS(ers) , Hardenburgh needs our help

by SHADOW Corporation » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:31 am
Hegstoria wrote:Hiedenburgh-Hardenburg wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=40549&p=1771455#p1771455
attention all CoNS(ers) , Hardenburgh needs our help
As supreme Commander of Coalition Forces and permanent member of the CDC, I believe getting involved in this conflict is constitutional and permitted by coalition laws. As such I motion for the Coalition Defense Force be mobilized to the defense Hardenburgh, all members of the CDC in favor please say I.
I
OOC: This is the first official vote besides my appointment and naming of the group by the CDC, as such I will explain some of it. Us 6 members, 5 permanent and 1 on rotation, shall vote on whether or not to go to war, we need a 2/3 vote in order to sanction operations. As for nuclear strikes, that needs unanimous support. It is all in the amendment that AL will(if he hasn't already) post.

by Hardenburgh » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:32 am
SHADOW Corporation wrote:Hegstoria wrote:Hiedenburgh-Hardenburg wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=40549&p=1771455#p1771455
attention all CoNS(ers) , Hardenburgh needs our help
As supreme Commander of Coalition Forces and permanent member of the CDC, I believe getting involved in this conflict is constitutional and permitted by coalition laws. As such I motion for the Coalition Defense Force be mobilized to the defense Hardenburgh, all members of the CDC in favor please say I.
I
OOC: This is the first official vote besides my appointment and naming of the group by the CDC, as such I will explain some of it. Us 6 members, 5 permanent and 1 on rotation, shall vote on whether or not to go to war, we need a 2/3 vote in order to sanction operations. As for nuclear strikes, that needs unanimous support. It is all in the amendment that AL will(if he hasn't already) post.
I say I as well we need to send a strong message to those who wish to harm the alliance and our allies.

by Hegstoria » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:32 am
Hiedenburgh-Hardenburg wrote:I

by Hardenburgh » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:33 am

by Hegstoria » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:34 am
Hardenburgh wrote:
YEAH Cloe
but I say go for it - just we need to watch it - do we declare war , and launch a massive attack on him , or go diplomatic , the latter I vote for

by Pearlescent » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:35 am
Hegstoria wrote:Hiedenburgh-Hardenburg wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=40549&p=1771455#p1771455
attention all CoNS(ers) , Hardenburgh needs our help
As supreme Commander of Coalition Forces and permanent member of the CDC, I believe getting involved in this conflict is constitutional and permitted by coalition laws. As such I motion for the Coalition Defense Force be mobilized to the defense Hardenburgh, all members of the CDC in favor please say I.
I
OOC: This is the first official vote besides my appointment and naming of the group by the CDC, as such I will explain some of it. Us 6 members, 5 permanent and 1 on rotation, shall vote on whether or not to go to war, we need a 2/3 vote in order to sanction operations. As for nuclear strikes, that needs unanimous support. It is all in the amendment that AL will(if he hasn't already) post.


by Vlack Sturm » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:37 am
Hegstoria wrote:Hardenburgh wrote:
YEAH Cloe
but I say go for it - just we need to watch it - do we declare war , and launch a massive attack on him , or go diplomatic , the latter I vote for
Well we would first send forces to the contested zones as peace keepers, and if things get out of hand, then we will fight.

by Hegstoria » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:38 am
Pearlescent wrote:Hegstoria wrote:Hiedenburgh-Hardenburg wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=40549&p=1771455#p1771455
attention all CoNS(ers) , Hardenburgh needs our help
As supreme Commander of Coalition Forces and permanent member of the CDC, I believe getting involved in this conflict is constitutional and permitted by coalition laws. As such I motion for the Coalition Defense Force be mobilized to the defense Hardenburgh, all members of the CDC in favor please say I.
I
OOC: This is the first official vote besides my appointment and naming of the group by the CDC, as such I will explain some of it. Us 6 members, 5 permanent and 1 on rotation, shall vote on whether or not to go to war, we need a 2/3 vote in order to sanction operations. As for nuclear strikes, that needs unanimous support. It is all in the amendment that AL will(if he hasn't already) post.
I would like to give my support to the Coalition's defense force, however my country is in no shape for another conflict at the moment. Therefore, Pearlescent shall remain neutral in this vote, leaving the issue unaddressed. However, if there will be an intervention, I would love to provide medical care and hospitality aid to the Coalition forces.

by Libetarian Republics » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:41 am

by Pearlescent » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:43 am
Hegstoria wrote:Pearlescent wrote:Hegstoria wrote:Hiedenburgh-Hardenburg wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=40549&p=1771455#p1771455
attention all CoNS(ers) , Hardenburgh needs our help
As supreme Commander of Coalition Forces and permanent member of the CDC, I believe getting involved in this conflict is constitutional and permitted by coalition laws. As such I motion for the Coalition Defense Force be mobilized to the defense Hardenburgh, all members of the CDC in favor please say I.
I
OOC: This is the first official vote besides my appointment and naming of the group by the CDC, as such I will explain some of it. Us 6 members, 5 permanent and 1 on rotation, shall vote on whether or not to go to war, we need a 2/3 vote in order to sanction operations. As for nuclear strikes, that needs unanimous support. It is all in the amendment that AL will(if he hasn't already) post.
I would like to give my support to the Coalition's defense force, however my country is in no shape for another conflict at the moment. Therefore, Pearlescent shall remain neutral in this vote, leaving the issue unaddressed. However, if there will be an intervention, I would love to provide medical care and hospitality aid to the Coalition forces.
Well you cannot vote, so it doesn't matter. If you would like to contribute arms and soldiers to the defense force that would be acceptable, you would have nothing to do with their actions.

Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: Erythrean Thebes, Hidrandia, Ixania, Jakewastaken Space Force, Lurinsk, The Astral Mandate, Tikariot, Viridescent Meadows
Advertisement