The Coalition of Nation States (Alliance, P/MT)

[Hardenburgh]

Can I make a suggestion - why doesn't the supreme commander get elected on a 6 month ? , basis , just so that the command infrastructure doesn't stagnate itself

[Hegstoria]

Can I make a suggestion - why doesn't the supreme commander get elected on a 6 month ? , basis , just so that the command infrastructure doesn't stagnate itself

A commander should not be elected, he should be appointed based on their merits.

[New Caldaris]

meh, I'll be it, as it seems I am one of the largest nations in CoNS

OOC: Modest much. Don't think too much of yourself pal, size does not relate to your RP skills.

OOC: Still, I am a memeber of Earth II, I just rarely RP Amazingly outside Earth II. Still, I've been Vieing for the job for a while...

being a member of earth II honestly does not mean you are an amazing rper or would be good for the position. And if your going to talk about it i was the one who has brought it up twice that we need one so again your point is moot.

[New Caldaris]

Can I make a suggestion - why doesn't the supreme commander get elected on a 6 month ? , basis , just so that the command infrastructure doesn't stagnate itself

A commander should not be elected, he should be appointed based on their merits.

agreed for the same reasons why i think we shouldnt elect judges they should be appointed. They shouldnt have to worry about getting re-elected and political correctness

[Hardenburgh]

Can I make a suggestion - why doesn't the supreme commander get elected on a 6 month ? , basis , just so that the command infrastructure doesn't stagnate itself

A commander should not be elected, he should be appointed based on their merits.

or a group should be selected on their merits for election - I tell you , I am not having Fed troops under one long term command

[East Fancainia]

meh, I'll be it, as it seems I am one of the largest nations in CoNS

OOC: Modest much. Don't think too much of yourself pal, size does not relate to your RP skills.

OOC: Still, I am a memeber of Earth II, I just rarely RP Amazingly outside Earth II. Still, I've been Vieing for the job for a while...

being a member of earth II honestly does not mean you are an amazing rper or would be good for the position. And if your going to talk about it i was the one who has brought it up twice that we need one so again your point is moot.

Earth II is a very prestigous RPing community, your point is "moot", I'd prefer having the job, as I am a member of the Big 4. Also...I have been asking sense the Alliance was made...

[New Caldaris]

meh, I'll be it, as it seems I am one of the largest nations in CoNS

OOC: Modest much. Don't think too much of yourself pal, size does not relate to your RP skills.

OOC: Still, I am a memeber of Earth II, I just rarely RP Amazingly outside Earth II. Still, I've been Vieing for the job for a while...

being a member of earth II honestly does not mean you are an amazing rper or would be good for the position. And if your going to talk about it i was the one who has brought it up twice that we need one so again your point is moot.

Earth II is a very prestigous RPing community, your point is "moot", I'd prefer having the job, as I am a member of the Big 4. Also...I have been asking sense the Alliance was made...

I am a member of the elected 5 and really? i havent seen you ask about once. Also to you it may be prestigous but not everybody shares your views. While i am not saying its terrible it just bears no weight in how we choose who is to be Supreme Commander. (god i keep thinking about the game everytime i say that XD)

[New Caldaris]

Can I make a suggestion - why doesn't the supreme commander get elected on a 6 month ? , basis , just so that the command infrastructure doesn't stagnate itself

A commander should not be elected, he should be appointed based on their merits.

or a group should be selected on their merits for election - I tell you , I am not having Fed troops under one long term command

They would only be under the SCs command during an alliance war/operation kind of like the UN except more organized better equipped and it would actually mean something to say that the CoNS Defence force was going to intervene lol (score one for me!!! hahaha suck it UN!!! XD)

[East Fancainia]

meh, I'll be it, as it seems I am one of the largest nations in CoNS

OOC: Modest much. Don't think too much of yourself pal, size does not relate to your RP skills.

OOC: Still, I am a memeber of Earth II, I just rarely RP Amazingly outside Earth II. Still, I've been Vieing for the job for a while...

being a member of earth II honestly does not mean you are an amazing rper or would be good for the position. And if your going to talk about it i was the one who has brought it up twice that we need one so again your point is moot.

Earth II is a very prestigous RPing community, your point is "moot", I'd prefer having the job, as I am a member of the Big 4. Also...I have been asking sense the Alliance was made...

I am a member of the elected 5 and really? i havent seen you ask about once. Also to you it may be prestigous but not everybody shares your views. While i am not saying its terrible it just bears no weight in how we choose who is to be Supreme Commander. (god i keep thinking about the game everytime i say that XD)

OOC: Hegs made a comment about how RPing skills don't come with age, more or less this should be voted upon in an official way, ans on another thread

[Hardenburgh]

Can I make a suggestion - why doesn't the supreme commander get elected on a 6 month ? , basis , just so that the command infrastructure doesn't stagnate itself

A commander should not be elected, he should be appointed based on their merits.

or a group should be selected on their merits for election - I tell you , I am not having Fed troops under one long term command

They would only be under the SCs command during an alliance war/operation kind of like the UN except more organized better equipped and it would actually mean something to say that the CoNS Defence force was going to intervene lol (score one for me!!! hahaha suck it UN!!! XD)

Well , all I am saying is I want a flexible leadership - these soldiers you have to remember at the end of the day are citizens of the federation , and hence , it is my duty , as president to protect them

[New Caldaris]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

[Hardenburgh]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

Or why don't you give it to a unrecognised member , who actually deserves the position

[East Fancainia]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

no....the electeds ALWAYS get a chance to vote, and we hold "Superficial powers" It's more or less 9 electeds...

[New Caldaris]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

no....the electeds ALWAYS get a chance to vote, and we hold "Superficial powers" It's more or less 9 electeds...

i have never once heard you or almaniania refer to it as the "council of 9" or ask us specifically our opinions or to vote on it.

[New Caldaris]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

Or why don't you give it to a unrecognised member , who actually deserves the position

if they were unrecognized then that means they are unactive so why would we give an unactive member the position?

[Hardenburgh]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

Or why don't you give it to a unrecognised member , who actually deserves the position

if they were unrecognized then that means they are unactive so why would we give an unactive member the position?

God Caldaris , I really do give up with you - I meant someone who did a lot for the organisation , but didn't have a position

[East Fancainia]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

no....the electeds ALWAYS get a chance to vote, and we hold "Superficial powers" It's more or less 9 electeds...

i have never once heard you or almaniania refer to it as the "council of 9" or ask us specifically our opinions or to vote on it.

Most of you are never on, this entire discussion is just...extremely stupid, as it seems people hat the Big 4, and the Electeds just want power, but it's fine, because Al will be the one who chooses.

[New Caldaris]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

Or why don't you give it to a unrecognised member , who actually deserves the position

if they were unrecognized then that means they are unactive so why would we give an unactive member the position?

God Caldaris , I really do give up with you - I meant someone who did a lot for the organisation , but didn't have a position

Wow you give up with me? wtf is that suppose to mean and if you meant that you could have just said a regular member as i already stated in my first post

[Hegstoria]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

no....the electeds ALWAYS get a chance to vote, and we hold "Superficial powers" It's more or less 9 electeds...

i have never once heard you or almaniania refer to it as the "council of 9" or ask us specifically our opinions or to vote on it.

Most of you are never on, this entire discussion is just...extremely stupid, as it seems people hat the Big 4, and the Electeds just want power, but it's fine, because Al will be the one who chooses.

Speak for yourself.

[Hardenburgh]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

Or why don't you give it to a unrecognised member , who actually deserves the position

if they were unrecognized then that means they are unactive so why would we give an unactive member the position?

God Caldaris , I really do give up with you - I meant someone who did a lot for the organisation , but didn't have a position

Wow you give up with me? wtf is that suppose to mean and if you meant that you could have just said a regular member as i already stated in my first post

well then - issue resolved , gives someone like that the post , as I said , all I care about is the wellbeing of the 150,000 personal , which is planned to increase to around 300,000 for this alliance

[Hegstoria]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

Or why don't you give it to a unrecognised member , who actually deserves the position

if they were unrecognized then that means they are unactive so why would we give an unactive member the position?

God Caldaris , I really do give up with you - I meant someone who did a lot for the organisation , but didn't have a position

Wow you give up with me? wtf is that suppose to mean and if you meant that you could have just said a regular member as i already stated in my first post

well then - issue resolved , gives someone like that the post , as I said , all I care about is the wellbeing of the 150,000 personal , which is planned to increase to around 300,000 for this alliance

You sincerely think you will get the post.

[New Caldaris]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

no....the electeds ALWAYS get a chance to vote, and we hold "Superficial powers" It's more or less 9 electeds...

i have never once heard you or almaniania refer to it as the "council of 9" or ask us specifically our opinions or to vote on it.

Most of you are never on, this entire discussion is just...extremely stupid, as it seems people hat the Big 4, and the Electeds just want power, but it's fine, because Al will be the one who chooses.

Really? lately trescott hasnt been on but he already told us why and i am on all the time and have missed most of the ammendments being passed due to you guys waiting 5 minutes then passing it. Also if possible to nominate a 2nd person id like to nominate SHADOW Corporation as he is pretty active and seems like a good rper.

[New Caldaris]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

Or why don't you give it to a unrecognised member , who actually deserves the position

if they were unrecognized then that means they are unactive so why would we give an unactive member the position?

God Caldaris , I really do give up with you - I meant someone who did a lot for the organisation , but didn't have a position

Wow you give up with me? wtf is that suppose to mean and if you meant that you could have just said a regular member as i already stated in my first post

well then - issue resolved , gives someone like that the post , as I said , all I care about is the wellbeing of the 150,000 personal , which is planned to increase to around 300,000 for this alliance

I would really appreciate it if you read my posts before posting insulting comments on them.

[Hardenburgh]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

Or why don't you give it to a unrecognised member , who actually deserves the position

if they were unrecognized then that means they are unactive so why would we give an unactive member the position?

God Caldaris , I really do give up with you - I meant someone who did a lot for the organisation , but didn't have a position

Wow you give up with me? wtf is that suppose to mean and if you meant that you could have just said a regular member as i already stated in my first post

well then - issue resolved , gives someone like that the post , as I said , all I care about is the wellbeing of the 150,000 personal , which is planned to increase to around 300,000 for this alliance

You sincerely think you will get the post.

No , I don't want the bleeding post - the troops are for you to deal with - I have an entire region to run , with some pretty awkward and annoying characters in it who take a lot of time to deal with - if you want to go down "the you want the post" road , can I just remind you that I see myself more as an observer and supporter of this alliance - I will help you with your Rondevu's but seek nothing in return

[SHADOW Corporation]

And honestly i think the position of Supreme Commander should be delegated to either a dedicated regular member or someone on the elected 5 as the big 4 already seem to make all the decisions without really consulting anyone else. (ammendments are passed without even a signifigant portion of the alliance voting on them)

Or why don't you give it to a unrecognised member , who actually deserves the position

if they were unrecognized then that means they are unactive so why would we give an unactive member the position?

What about me? I'm level headed calm and can drop the hammer when need be. And unrecognized.