North Calaveras wrote:Who wants to give the American Legion a few SUV's with miniguns?
Are you the one in CA?
Advertisement

by Liberusy » Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:00 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Who wants to give the American Legion a few SUV's with miniguns?

by North Calaveras » Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:11 pm

by Liberusy » Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:13 pm

by Liberusy » Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:43 pm
Gyrenaica wrote:Ok. Texas' annexation of those nations is complete horseshit.

by Creatle » Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:44 pm

by Gyrenaica » Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:50 pm

by Liberusy » Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:52 pm

by Gyrenaica » Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:56 pm
Liberusy wrote:Gyrenaica wrote:They wouldn't just join you. Also, Saudi Arabia would not let Texas annex them.
Well they would because they know they would get more money for there oil if they did and we promised them protection [and the current leaders are still allowed to be regional leaders] Plus I never said Saudi Arabia would be happy about it, but we did the operation in secret so that Saudi Arabia. Modern Day Kuwait is basically part of the US now in everything but name.

by Liberusy » Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:02 pm
Gyrenaica wrote:Liberusy wrote:Well they would because they know they would get more money for there oil if they did and we promised them protection [and the current leaders are still allowed to be regional leaders] Plus I never said Saudi Arabia would be happy about it, but we did the operation in secret so that Saudi Arabia. Modern Day Kuwait is basically part of the US now in everything but name.
1. They have Saudi Arabia to protect them.
2. They aren't any under any threat
3. They wouldn't want to join you because of past sins colonists have committed
4. How would Saudi Arabia not know about this when it border them
5. Kuwait... Wow your statement was beyond ignorant.


by Gyrenaica » Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:05 pm
Liberusy wrote:Gyrenaica wrote:1. They have Saudi Arabia to protect them.
2. They aren't any under any threat
3. They wouldn't want to join you because of past sins colonists have committed
4. How would Saudi Arabia not know about this when it border them
5. Kuwait... Wow your statement was beyond ignorant.
Listen just cause your mad because I ain't socialist doesn't mean I didn't take it.
1. Saudi Arabia made no promise to protect them, however they are working with Socialist nations.
2. Socialist nations would have conquested them and redistributed the wealth.
3. We aren't past colonist and we promised to be ethical and leave them alone.
4. Saudi Arabia will not about it, but by that time t will be to late.
5. Ignorance is Bliss


by Liberusy » Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:15 pm
Gyrenaica wrote:Liberusy wrote:Listen just cause your mad because I ain't socialist doesn't mean I didn't take it.
1. Saudi Arabia made no promise to protect them, however they are working with Socialist nations.
2. Socialist nations would have conquested them and redistributed the wealth.
3. We aren't past colonist and we promised to be ethical and leave them alone.
4. Saudi Arabia will not about it, but by that time t will be to late.
5. Ignorance is Bliss
They don't officially have Saudi protection but, Saudi would protect them if they were invaded.
2. No, us socialist aren't expanding. It's you.
3. If you're going to leave them alone, why are you annexing them?
4. It won't be too late. I will back Saudi Arabia.
5. Ignorance gets you killed.
Gyrenaica wrote:Your kind of shitty excuse for annexation is the kind that ruins rps.

by Gyrenaica » Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:24 pm
Liberusy wrote:Gyrenaica wrote:They don't officially have Saudi protection but, Saudi would protect them if they were invaded.
2. No, us socialist aren't expanding. It's you.
3. If you're going to leave them alone, why are you annexing them?
4. It won't be too late. I will back Saudi Arabia.
5. Ignorance gets you killed.
Your just mad because I got there before you did. I don't want to have a war over the territories but I wont back down either.Gyrenaica wrote:Your kind of shitty excuse for annexation is the kind that ruins rps.
How come when Socialist South America annexes Cuba [by popular vote, nonetheless] they get no problems. But when I try to annex a small part of the Arabian Pens. I get cited for ruining the RP? Think about it, the leaders of the country [who are also oil company owners, or at least lobbied by them] would benefit because they will be able to charge more for oil now [since Texas produces oil] and at no cost, they still get to be leaders [provided they follow the Texas Constitution] and they get Texas military protection. Just because I was more clever then you in deciding to seize this opportunity doesn't mean that you should cite unreasonable reasons why its unrealistic.

by Gyrenaica » Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:27 pm

by Liberusy » Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:27 pm
Gyrenaica wrote:Liberusy wrote:Well they would because they know they would get more money for there oil if they did and we promised them protection [and the current leaders are still allowed to be regional leaders] Plus I never said Saudi Arabia would be happy about it, but we did the operation in secret so that Saudi Arabia. Modern Day Kuwait is basically part of the US now in everything but name.
1. They have Saudi Arabia to protect them.
2. They aren't any under any threat
3. They wouldn't want to join you because of past sins colonists have committed
4. How would Saudi Arabia not know about this when it border them
5. Kuwait... Wow your statement was beyond ignorant.

by Liberusy » Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:30 pm
Gyrenaica wrote:All those nations weren't under any threat, in any way shape of form. They'd not need your protection.
Also, I just noticed, Kuwait is already reserved.

by Gyrenaica » Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:31 pm
Liberusy wrote:Gyrenaica wrote:1. They have Saudi Arabia to protect them.
2. They aren't any under any threat
3. They wouldn't want to join you because of past sins colonists have committed
4. How would Saudi Arabia not know about this when it border them
5. Kuwait... Wow your statement was beyond ignorant.
Well I doubt Africa would except it considering they face no major outside threats, as of now.
[And they have nothing that would entice nations to conquer them]
Besides how would they economically benefit from it?
Lastly they probably want to have self government, which you probably couldn't promise being socialist.
If it is really that big a deal to you, I can say [though it will be Top Secret] that I bribed the leaders to be annexed, but I don't think its necessary.

by Liberusy » Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:34 pm
Gyrenaica wrote:Liberusy wrote:Well I doubt Africa would except it considering they face no major outside threats, as of now.
[And they have nothing that would entice nations to conquer them]
Besides how would they economically benefit from it?
Lastly they probably want to have self government, which you probably couldn't promise being socialist.
If it is really that big a deal to you, I can say [though it will be Top Secret] that I bribed the leaders to be annexed, but I don't think its necessary.
The communist nations of Africa would gladly join me. Those being: Congo, Angola, Mozambique, Benin, a few others.
I could promise self governance, actually. I am a parliamentary republic it's not the economic ideals that determine the politics.

by New Anglo-Saxonland » Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:36 pm
Gyrenaica wrote:I have seen this before. I've been in plenty of rps. Your kind of shit destroys rps. It's godmodding. Same with SFULAN. Cuba had no official enemies, and had USSR backing.
I request op to look more into both the Texas annexations of Arabia and SFULAN of Cuba.
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: Amenson, Ayshire, Champlania, GOLTZBORG, Legatia, Lodhs beard, Syrvanian Republic, The Selkie, The Tsunterlands
Advertisement