Advertisement

by Jurestist » Wed Aug 05, 2015 7:23 am

by New Yuktobanian Republics » Wed Aug 05, 2015 11:50 am

by Jurestist » Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:08 pm

by Jurestist » Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:13 pm
Nordengrad wrote:"Somalia"
You mean the worst country in the world that is overrun by Al Shabab?
Haha... funny.

by Antarcteca » Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:32 pm
Having fought Antarteca twice before, we have developed a respect of the Grand Republic. There fore, we declare war on all enemy's of Antarteca

by New Yuktobanian Republics » Wed Aug 05, 2015 1:34 pm
Nordengrad wrote:Antarcteca wrote:I'm sure the Democratic Republic of the Congo is willing to side with NATO. Be careful jurestist because if I manage to have the DRC to side with NATO(DRC is Grand Switzerland I believe), they are planning to expand all throughout central and Southern Africa. And if you attempted to stop them you would look an awfuly lot like an imperialist without jurisdiction.
Imma put some Air Bases in the DRC if they side with NATO for totally non politcally influenced reasons.


by Jurestist » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:15 pm
Antarcteca wrote:I'm sure the Democratic Republic of the Congo is willing to side with NATO. Be careful jurestist because if I manage to have the DRC to side with NATO(DRC is Grand Switzerland I believe), they are planning to expand all throughout central and Southern Africa. And if you attempted to stop them you would look an awfuly lot like an imperialist without jurisdiction.

by Antarcteca » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:24 pm
Jurestist wrote:Antarcteca wrote:I'm sure the Democratic Republic of the Congo is willing to side with NATO. Be careful jurestist because if I manage to have the DRC to side with NATO(DRC is Grand Switzerland I believe), they are planning to expand all throughout central and Southern Africa. And if you attempted to stop them you would look an awfuly lot like an imperialist without jurisdiction.
If they do that they would make NATO like Imperialists more so than the Imperialist Bloc
Having fought Antarteca twice before, we have developed a respect of the Grand Republic. There fore, we declare war on all enemy's of Antarteca

by Jurestist » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Antarcteca wrote:Jurestist wrote:
If they do that they would make NATO like Imperialists more so than the Imperialist Bloc
Imperialist take over lands like the Imperialist Bloc... NATO on the other hand doesn't do organization side missions to annex land -- we diplomatically help nations convene for unity. Unlike the Imperialist Bloc.
The real imperialist here are you and if your not proud of your own bloc then I believe your fellow members have things to worry about...

by Zadiner » Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:52 pm


by The United States of Soviet Britain » Wed Aug 05, 2015 3:03 pm


by Jurestist » Wed Aug 05, 2015 3:19 pm
The United States of Soviet Britain wrote:If it's cool with you guys, specifically you Antarctica, I wanted to make a Socialist Sub-Section of NATO. A group of NATO states that are under heavy Soviet political influence since they are so close to the Soviet Union. The nations I want to put in this sub-section are:
(Image)
USSR
Poland
Czechoslovakia
Hungary
Romania
Bulgaria
Yugoslavia
Albania
I figured that over the history of the scenario, the USSR would be heavily invested in assuring that Europe was kept in line with NATO while the United States was off fighting proxy wars with Jurestist and Japan, and a side-effect of this would be socialist and pro-Soviet politicians popping up in Eastern Europe, inadvertently creating a sub-section of socialist states in NATO. They could be casually called the "Socialist Bloc" or "The Socialist Sisters" or something like that.
All of them remain loyal to the west, with the exception of Poland and Yugoslavia who are pro-NATO, but not official members. It would just be a secondary agreement that in a way, tie Poland and Yugoslavia even closer to NATO since similar provisions and ideals are used in a mutual defense and economic pact between all of them.
I figured this was reasonable and would be interesting.

by The United States of Soviet Britain » Wed Aug 05, 2015 3:46 pm
Jurestist wrote:
I may have to do a covert JSU mission to convince the US that the USSR is plotting against them

by Jurestist » Wed Aug 05, 2015 3:49 pm
The United States of Soviet Britain wrote:Jurestist wrote:
I may have to do a covert JSU mission to convince the US that the USSR is plotting against them
Ha, would be funny. Unlikely though.
Soviet and American troops fought and died together against Poldarian forces in World War II. KGB and CIA operatives have been captured and tortured together by JSU and Japanese Intelligence agencies. The Soviet government held a national day of mourning when 9/11 happened. The Soviet Union sent over 300,000 of her troops to their potential deaths to help America in Iraq and Afghanistan. And the Soviets cannot have a separate economic and military deal from NATO? Ha, a foolish thought. I doubt US operatives, members of possibly the best intelligence agency in the world, will buy what the JSU is selling.
USA-USSR 4 LYFE.

by The United States of Soviet Britain » Wed Aug 05, 2015 3:50 pm

by The United States of Soviet Britain » Wed Aug 05, 2015 3:54 pm

by Carriebeanian union of carriebeans » Wed Aug 05, 2015 3:56 pm


by Jurestist » Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:02 pm
The United States of Soviet Britain wrote:Besides, if what I have proposed is accepted, it would have taken place back in the 60-70's era. It would be very old news to the US government.

by The Germanian states » Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:03 pm

by Carriebeanian union of carriebeans » Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:05 pm
The Germanian states wrote:Indonesia will have at least 3 Nuclear missiles

by The United States of Soviet Britain » Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:07 pm
Jurestist wrote:The United States of Soviet Britain wrote:Besides, if what I have proposed is accepted, it would have taken place back in the 60-70's era. It would be very old news to the US government.
I could RP that the African Trade Partnership took place in the late 90's to help boost the economies of the African nations involved

by The United States of Soviet Britain » Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:12 pm

by Jurestist » Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:18 pm
The United States of Soviet Britain wrote:Jurestist wrote:
The ATP was started by my nation to increase trade to African nations and expose the world to African goods
Why would you start a program like that? It would be more beneficial to you, as well s it would be more imperialist, to try and keep African economies down. Making it easier for countries like Madagascar and South Africa to dominate the continent.
Also remember, when the RP starts, everyone has a bad economy.
Advertisement
Return to International Incidents
Users browsing this forum: European Federal Union, Syrvanian Republic, The Imperium Of Alarisia, The Military State of the Galapagos
Advertisement