Project Warfighter: "Tier-One" RP Group, OPEN

[Shazbotdom]

Okay. So today was a good day.

[Creatle]

Okay. So today was a good day.

I....uhhhh...not sure....its up and down

[Shazbotdom]

Okay. So today was a good day.

I....uhhhh...not sure....its up and down

Well this morning I had an appointment at a place called the "Bayou Barn" with my fiance. We decided it was going to be our venue for our wedding, and we finally set a date. April 8, 2017.

So a very good day here in New Orleans for the Shaz Man.

[Congreveopia]

I....uhhhh...not sure....its up and down

Well this morning I had an appointment at a place called the "Bayou Barn" with my fiance. We decided it was going to be our venue for our wedding, and we finally set a date. April 8, 2017.

So a very good day here in New Orleans for the Shaz Man.

Congrats!

Regardless, Can we do some tweaking to Nova's Castle if you all want a war. Because Im good at making wars...

Yeah, that sounds good. Have a quick not-officially-TFA war involving the TFA nations that are looking for a war, and that way I don't have to rush to finish RC to oblige people and I can take it and the following war at a sensible pace. I like it.

Need a hand designing the scenario, maps, forces, anything?

[Creatle]

I....uhhhh...not sure....its up and down

Well this morning I had an appointment at a place called the "Bayou Barn" with my fiance. We decided it was going to be our venue for our wedding, and we finally set a date. April 8, 2017.

So a very good day here in New Orleans for the Shaz Man.

That made me happy! Congratulations!

[Altito Asmoro]

I....uhhhh...not sure....its up and down

Well this morning I had an appointment at a place called the "Bayou Barn" with my fiance. We decided it was going to be our venue for our wedding, and we finally set a date. April 8, 2017.

So a very good day here in New Orleans for the Shaz Man.

Congratulations!

[Creatle]

Since im bassically rebuilding Nova's Castle, I need to know what to do first. The only things that are gonna stay is the map and the whole concept of this being a war.

[Icrum]

So ummm, I forgot about this group due to my NS Dedness.

Can I rejoin?

[Creatle]

Well this morning I had an appointment at a place called the "Bayou Barn" with my fiance. We decided it was going to be our venue for our wedding, and we finally set a date. April 8, 2017.

So a very good day here in New Orleans for the Shaz Man.

Congrats!

Regardless, Can we do some tweaking to Nova's Castle if you all want a war. Because Im good at making wars...

Yeah, that sounds good. Have a quick not-officially-TFA war involving the TFA nations that are looking for a war, and that way I don't have to rush to finish RC to oblige people and I can take it and the following war at a sensible pace. I like it.

Need a hand designing the scenario, maps, forces, anything?

I had completed the whole thing a while ago, however the scale of the operation was...well...very very large. So it got scrapped until we got around to fixing it. The map doesnt need work as Its perfect. However I need to know where to start afterwards.

[Die Erworbenen Namen]

Well this morning I had an appointment at a place called the "Bayou Barn" with my fiance. We decided it was going to be our venue for our wedding, and we finally set a date. April 8, 2017.

So a very good day here in New Orleans for the Shaz Man.

Congrats!

Regardless, Can we do some tweaking to Nova's Castle if you all want a war. Because Im good at making wars...

Yeah, that sounds good. Have a quick not-officially-TFA war involving the TFA nations that are looking for a war, and that way I don't have to rush to finish RC to oblige people and I can take it and the following war at a sensible pace. I like it.

Need a hand designing the scenario, maps, forces, anything?

Well, RC will probably tie into it. Deteriorate things a bit.

I can help, anyway.

[The United Remnants of America]

Icrum. Yes.

[Monfrox]

Edited in the second part of the BK post to the draft. Now just need something for the third...ahem...

[Creatle]

So the war is going to be in Nova's Castle right?

[Congreveopia]

Congrats!


Yeah, that sounds good. Have a quick not-officially-TFA war involving the TFA nations that are looking for a war, and that way I don't have to rush to finish RC to oblige people and I can take it and the following war at a sensible pace. I like it.

Need a hand designing the scenario, maps, forces, anything?

I had completed the whole thing a while ago, however the scale of the operation was...well...very very large. So it got scrapped until we got around to fixing it. The map doesnt need work as Its perfect. However I need to know where to start afterwards.

So, first thing's to figure out the plot/cause-of-the-conflict, I'd say. And the first question we need to ask there is: do we want all of us to be on the same side? Because that determines whether the OPFOR will be obviously evil so that everyone can gang up on them, or have a more nuanced position so that people can take either side.

Form an OOC perspective, having the "teams" too imbalanced in terms of players can be a problem, just because the larger "team" will always be waiting for posts from the smaller one, just because there are more of them so they can collectively post faster. So I'd say we want a nuanced position.

There are many forms that the nuanced position can take, to my mind, but they all revolve around an issue that a reasonable nation can take either side on. For example: "Is it better to ensure stability in a region or try to help the civilian population? (civil war: support the dictator's regime or the revolutionaries)" or "Is communism or capitalism better? (international war: support the communist nation or the capitalist one)" or "Is international law more important than my economy? (international war: support the attacked nation to show warmongering will not be tolerated or support the imperialistic nation for a cut of the spoils)"

So, with the "The Socialist Liberators" plotline, what I'd say is make the group mainly consists of citizens of the nation in question, either working with foreign military equipment or even with equipment stolen from the army. Then make the government somewhat corrupt and morally questionable (president in power past term limits, etc). Then its a battle of well-intentioned but potentially destructive revolutionaries versus a government that's not the best but is at least stable. So nations will have to choose whether they optimistically believe The Socialist Liberators can create a strong nation, or whether it's better to side with the devil they know and prop up the current government.

How does that sound to people?

Well, RC will probably tie into it. Deteriorate things a bit.

I can help, anyway.

I think we should leave it unconnected to RC. Say it happens a bit earlier, and we'll leave the RC war until we know how RC ends.

---

Also, maybe we should create an OOC for this and take this conversation there, because it's no longer really a PW thing.

[Icrum]

Icrum. Yes.

Aight, will begin app soon.
And will stay more active this time.

[Die Erworbenen Namen]

I had completed the whole thing a while ago, however the scale of the operation was...well...very very large. So it got scrapped until we got around to fixing it. The map doesnt need work as Its perfect. However I need to know where to start afterwards.

So, first thing's to figure out the plot/cause-of-the-conflict, I'd say. And the first question we need to ask there is: do we want all of us to be on the same side? Because that determines whether the OPFOR will be obviously evil so that everyone can gang up on them, or have a more nuanced position so that people can take either side.

Form an OOC perspective, having the "teams" too imbalanced in terms of players can be a problem, just because the larger "team" will always be waiting for posts from the smaller one, just because there are more of them so they can collectively post faster. So I'd say we want a nuanced position.

There are many forms that the nuanced position can take, to my mind, but they all revolve around an issue that a reasonable nation can take either side on. For example: "Is it better to ensure stability in a region or try to help the civilian population? (civil war: support the dictator's regime or the revolutionaries)" or "Is communism or capitalism better? (international war: support the communist nation or the capitalist one)" or "Is international law more important than my economy? (international war: support the attacked nation to show warmongering will not be tolerated or support the imperialistic nation for a cut of the spoils)"

So, with the "The Socialist Liberators" plotline, what I'd say is make the group mainly consists of citizens of the nation in question, either working with foreign military equipment or even with equipment stolen from the army. Then make the government somewhat corrupt and morally questionable (president in power past term limits, etc). Then its a battle of well-intentioned but potentially destructive revolutionaries versus a government that's not the best but is at least stable. So nations will have to choose whether they optimistically believe The Socialist Liberators can create a strong nation, or whether it's better to side with the devil they know and prop up the current government.

How does that sound to people?

Well, RC will probably tie into it. Deteriorate things a bit.

I can help, anyway.

I think we should leave it unconnected to RC. Say it happens a bit earlier, and we'll leave the RC war until we know how RC ends.

---

Also, maybe we should create an OOC for this and take this conversation there, because it's no longer really a PW thing.

>Is socialist nation
>Is massive
>Is incredibly successful

Yes,
and,
yes.

[Altito Asmoro]

I had completed the whole thing a while ago, however the scale of the operation was...well...very very large. So it got scrapped until we got around to fixing it. The map doesnt need work as Its perfect. However I need to know where to start afterwards.

So, first thing's to figure out the plot/cause-of-the-conflict, I'd say. And the first question we need to ask there is: do we want all of us to be on the same side? Because that determines whether the OPFOR will be obviously evil so that everyone can gang up on them, or have a more nuanced position so that people can take either side.

Form an OOC perspective, having the "teams" too imbalanced in terms of players can be a problem, just because the larger "team" will always be waiting for posts from the smaller one, just because there are more of them so they can collectively post faster. So I'd say we want a nuanced position.

There are many forms that the nuanced position can take, to my mind, but they all revolve around an issue that a reasonable nation can take either side on. For example: "Is it better to ensure stability in a region or try to help the civilian population? (civil war: support the dictator's regime or the revolutionaries)" or "Is communism or capitalism better? (international war: support the communist nation or the capitalist one)" or "Is international law more important than my economy? (international war: support the attacked nation to show warmongering will not be tolerated or support the imperialistic nation for a cut of the spoils)"

So, with the "The Socialist Liberators" plotline, what I'd say is make the group mainly consists of citizens of the nation in question, either working with foreign military equipment or even with equipment stolen from the army. Then make the government somewhat corrupt and morally questionable (president in power past term limits, etc). Then its a battle of well-intentioned but potentially destructive revolutionaries versus a government that's not the best but is at least stable. So nations will have to choose whether they optimistically believe The Socialist Liberators can create a strong nation, or whether it's better to side with the devil they know and prop up the current government.

How does that sound to people?

Well, RC will probably tie into it. Deteriorate things a bit.

I can help, anyway.

I think we should leave it unconnected to RC. Say it happens a bit earlier, and we'll leave the RC war until we know how RC ends.

---

Also, maybe we should create an OOC for this and take this conversation there, because it's no longer really a PW thing.

>socialist
>massive
>quite successful

Yep.

[ISAF-Usea]

Anyone feel like funding some rebs going against an occupation?

[Shyluz]

Anyone feel like funding some rebs going against an occupation?

Are they socialist?

Are they communist?

Will the revolution be quick?

[Die Erworbenen Namen]

Anyone feel like funding some rebs going against an occupation?

Are they socialist?

Are they communist?

Will the revolution be quick?

Viva la Revolucion!

[Creatle]

I had completed the whole thing a while ago, however the scale of the operation was...well...very very large. So it got scrapped until we got around to fixing it. The map doesnt need work as Its perfect. However I need to know where to start afterwards.

So, first thing's to figure out the plot/cause-of-the-conflict, I'd say. And the first question we need to ask there is: do we want all of us to be on the same side? Because that determines whether the OPFOR will be obviously evil so that everyone can gang up on them, or have a more nuanced position so that people can take either side.

Form an OOC perspective, having the "teams" too imbalanced in terms of players can be a problem, just because the larger "team" will always be waiting for posts from the smaller one, just because there are more of them so they can collectively post faster. So I'd say we want a nuanced position.

There are many forms that the nuanced position can take, to my mind, but they all revolve around an issue that a reasonable nation can take either side on. For example: "Is it better to ensure stability in a region or try to help the civilian population? (civil war: support the dictator's regime or the revolutionaries)" or "Is communism or capitalism better? (international war: support the communist nation or the capitalist one)" or "Is international law more important than my economy? (international war: support the attacked nation to show warmongering will not be tolerated or support the imperialistic nation for a cut of the spoils)"

So, with the "The Socialist Liberators" plotline, what I'd say is make the group mainly consists of citizens of the nation in question, either working with foreign military equipment or even with equipment stolen from the army. Then make the government somewhat corrupt and morally questionable (president in power past term limits, etc). Then its a battle of well-intentioned but potentially destructive revolutionaries versus a government that's not the best but is at least stable. So nations will have to choose whether they optimistically believe The Socialist Liberators can create a strong nation, or whether it's better to side with the devil they know and prop up the current government.

How does that sound to people?

Well, RC will probably tie into it. Deteriorate things a bit.

I can help, anyway.

I think we should leave it unconnected to RC. Say it happens a bit earlier, and we'll leave the RC war until we know how RC ends.

---

Also, maybe we should create an OOC for this and take this conversation there, because it's no longer really a PW thing.

Yes, this definantly sounds like a good idea, it probably shouldn't be connected to RC.

[Creatle]

Vive La ME!!!

[Creatle]

Are they socialist?

Are they communist?

Will the revolution be quick?

Viva la Revolucion!

Viva la Learn to Spell Revolution

[Congreveopia]

So, first thing's to figure out the plot/cause-of-the-conflict, I'd say. And the first question we need to ask there is: do we want all of us to be on the same side? Because that determines whether the OPFOR will be obviously evil so that everyone can gang up on them, or have a more nuanced position so that people can take either side.

Form an OOC perspective, having the "teams" too imbalanced in terms of players can be a problem, just because the larger "team" will always be waiting for posts from the smaller one, just because there are more of them so they can collectively post faster. So I'd say we want a nuanced position.

There are many forms that the nuanced position can take, to my mind, but they all revolve around an issue that a reasonable nation can take either side on. For example: "Is it better to ensure stability in a region or try to help the civilian population? (civil war: support the dictator's regime or the revolutionaries)" or "Is communism or capitalism better? (international war: support the communist nation or the capitalist one)" or "Is international law more important than my economy? (international war: support the attacked nation to show warmongering will not be tolerated or support the imperialistic nation for a cut of the spoils)"

So, with the "The Socialist Liberators" plotline, what I'd say is make the group mainly consists of citizens of the nation in question, either working with foreign military equipment or even with equipment stolen from the army. Then make the government somewhat corrupt and morally questionable (president in power past term limits, etc). Then its a battle of well-intentioned but potentially destructive revolutionaries versus a government that's not the best but is at least stable. So nations will have to choose whether they optimistically believe The Socialist Liberators can create a strong nation, or whether it's better to side with the devil they know and prop up the current government.

How does that sound to people?


I think we should leave it unconnected to RC. Say it happens a bit earlier, and we'll leave the RC war until we know how RC ends.

---

Also, maybe we should create an OOC for this and take this conversation there, because it's no longer really a PW thing.

Yes, this definantly sounds like a good idea, it probably shouldn't be connected to RC.

Do you want to create an OOC thread for it so we can discuss it more without interrupting PW?

[Creatle]

Yes, this definantly sounds like a good idea, it probably shouldn't be connected to RC.

Do you want to create an OOC thread for it so we can discuss it more without interrupting PW?

I'll make it and post it back here in a minute