NATION

PASSWORD

Open Letter From the Mentor Team, Re: Security Council

A staging-point for declarations of war and other major diplomatic events. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Jonathanian States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13692
Founded: Nov 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Jonathanian States » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:17 am

Hurdegaryp wrote:
Phocidaea wrote:Is excrement still descending in here?
that is, shit going down

Well, what do you think? Better stay away from that place, it is full of methane.

Voltrovia wrote:I view the outrages and mass protests that emerge from time to time on NS (whether or not I agree with their cause) as "flashpoints". When I saw Mall's proposal and the initial response I just thought "here we go, flashpoint time..."

Plus, this certainly isn't over yet.

Undoubtedly the moderators will try to smother it, but the season is not on their side. It is summer, after all.

Aye. Maybe finally a summer has come that the NSers can approve of. Maybe finally this is our summer.
Before "This is your second Summer".
Grenartia wrote:
Constaniana wrote:It's been coming down so much there's hardly any room left.

Or saying that black people in the US should have dealt with segregation by moving back to Africa, really.


Indeed. It seems to be one trait common to raiders, to never make an argument that isn't half-assed, and to always be condescending whilst doing so.

Also, I'm rather upset at Minnysota's warning for his/her/their WA draft to "Liberate Mallorea and Riva". Apparently, satirical proposals are actionable now. I half want to make a draft myself. Working title is: "Repeal Warn Minnysota".

DO eeeet!Author does not in any way take responsibility for mod reactions against such a thread, but will gladly endorse aforementioned repeal.
Ruridova wrote:
Victoriala wrote:>Abusing the system is the game

Holy shit.

Just, what the fuck.

Just what.

Is 'abusing the system is the game' the new 'it's only politics'?

Could be. Flag-switching time?
Evil Wolf wrote:If it passes, then that would seem to suggest the majority didn't oppose it. :P

Or, you know, the majority of NS isn't in the WA.......
Jordslag wrote:I hope those WA delegates don't actually pass this. The majority of NSers oppose this. I hope they listen.

Same.
Registug wrote:I also wish to sign

It's rather inspiring to see all these people I've never met or even seen on the forums before all come here united in their response
...
same here. Though also suddenly seeing many faces flags I've seen all over the forums join up here is nice.
EDIT: Fix'd Registug Quote.
Last edited by The Jonathanian States on Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Returned Nationstater -- You can leave Nationstates but Nationstates won't leave you.
Call me Jon, John, or Johnny, Jonathan or Jonnyboy, tJS and Jonathanian, with "states" or without.
This nation doesn't really represent my views and sarcasm is awesome.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:19 am

Grenartia wrote:
Constaniana wrote:It's been coming down so much there's hardly any room left.

Or saying that black people in the US should have dealt with segregation by moving back to Africa, really.


Indeed. It seems to be one trait common to raiders, to never make an argument that isn't half-assed, and to always be condescending whilst doing so.

Also, I'm rather upset at Minnysota's warning for his/her/their WA draft to "Liberate Mallorea and Riva". Apparently, satirical proposals are actionable now. I half want to make a draft myself. Working title is: "Repeal Warn Minnysota".

Questers got a warning for hacking threats, by paraphrasing Mall's line of "doing better with the [region] if it had no password".
I think that's even madder.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
United Provinces of Atlantica
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1850
Founded: Jan 02, 2013
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby United Provinces of Atlantica » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:20 am

I wish to sign.

The Invado-'Liberation' attempt is unjust.
Citizen of Lazarus
The Most Serene Confederation of Vasturia: FactbookConstitutionReligionOther
Warden in The Grey Wardens - Join Today!

User avatar
Evil Wolf
Minister
 
Posts: 2407
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Evil Wolf » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:20 am

The Jonathanian States wrote:Or, you know, the majority of NS isn't in the WA.......

And whose fault is that?
It's ok! You can trust me! I've been Commended!

Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.

Mallorea and Riva should be a Game Moderator Game Administrator.

User avatar
Registug
Senator
 
Posts: 4792
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Registug » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:24 am

Evil Wolf wrote:
The Jonathanian States wrote:Or, you know, the majority of NS isn't in the WA.......

And whose fault is that?

Don't go around saying shit like this

why does someone HAVE to join the WA? Who says they have to? Why should they have to?
Call me Garshne

Astrayan

User avatar
Evil Wolf
Minister
 
Posts: 2407
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Evil Wolf » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:27 am

Well, if the Security Council resolution passes, someone who refuses to be in the WA complaining about it passing is a bit like not voting for President and then complaining about how everyone else voted.
It's ok! You can trust me! I've been Commended!

Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.

Mallorea and Riva should be a Game Moderator Game Administrator.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:28 am

Evil Wolf wrote:
Hurdegaryp wrote:The significantly reduced traffic on this forum caused by such a poorly thought out policy would at least cripple the income of this forum, since all those unviewed adds will generate no profit at all. There are faster ways to destroy an internet community, but it's a start.


RP is a large portion of the site, true, but to suggest that RP is the only portion of the site worth playing and that it makes all the money for the forum is a rather grandiose claim. Just as NS does not revolve around RP, I somehow doubt that all it's profits (which I'm sure aren't much) are entirely from Role Play.

In any case, I enjoy the strangeness of this situation, where RPers act very offended when people suggest restrictions, as ridiculous as they are, be placed upon the RP community, but then those same RPers 1. are completely straight faced and serious when they talk about wanting to destroy the Military Gameplay community.

It's as equally a ludicrous and arrogant as suggesting the destruction of the RP community and yet many here seemingly don't see the irony.


Nope. I can almost guarantee you that 95% of the time anybody says "get rid of R/D", they're doing it satirically. Because we know that actually doing so only gives you ammo.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Jordslag
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7886
Founded: Jun 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Jordslag » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:30 am

Evil Wolf wrote:If it passes, then that would seem to suggest the majority didn't oppose it. :P

Not everyone is on the WA. Even fewer are delegates.

User avatar
The Jonathanian States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13692
Founded: Nov 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Jonathanian States » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:30 am

Evil Wolf wrote:
The Jonathanian States wrote:Or, you know, the majority of NS isn't in the WA.......

And whose fault is that?

I'd say the FAQ:
The almighty FAQ wrote:Your nation can join the WA, but it's not compulsory. If you remain outside, you're unaffected by its decisions.

Considering it doesn't quite indicate the influence the SC (which requires WA-membership) can have on you, by acting on the region.
I mean, I had my nation remain outside, but I clearly would clearly have been affected if raiders had raided the region I was in(and say hidden my messages, just to make it directly on me) via a SC resolution...1
1 - In my case they didn't, we didn't even have a password back then, but that's what hypothetical examples are for.
Evil Wolf wrote:Well, if the Security Council resolution passes, someone who refuses to be in the WA complaining about it passing is a bit like not voting for President and then complaining about how everyone else voted.
More like an Autonomous region which always was left out of national politics suddenly becoming the hotbed of the elections, with some candidates wanting to remove its autonomous status.
Returned Nationstater -- You can leave Nationstates but Nationstates won't leave you.
Call me Jon, John, or Johnny, Jonathan or Jonnyboy, tJS and Jonathanian, with "states" or without.
This nation doesn't really represent my views and sarcasm is awesome.

User avatar
Evil Wolf
Minister
 
Posts: 2407
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Evil Wolf » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:31 am

Grenartia wrote:Nope. I can almost guarantee you that 95% of the time anybody says "get rid of R/D", they're doing it satirically. Because we know that actually doing so only gives you ammo.


You're joking, right? There are two active threads right now talking about "opting-in" or "opting-out" of raiding with the suggested penalties for violating this "opting" process being Deletion. >_<

But I suppose those threads were all made satirically, so we can just lock them now. :P
It's ok! You can trust me! I've been Commended!

Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.

Mallorea and Riva should be a Game Moderator Game Administrator.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:32 am

Evil Wolf wrote:
Hurdegaryp wrote:The significantly reduced traffic on this forum caused by such a poorly thought out policy would at least cripple the income of this forum, since all those unviewed adds will generate no profit at all. There are faster ways to destroy an internet community, but it's a start.


RP is a large portion of the site, true, but to suggest that RP is the only portion of the site worth playing and that it makes all the money for the forum is a rather grandiose claim. Just as NS does not revolve around RP, I somehow doubt that all it's profits (which I'm sure aren't much) are entirely from Role Play.

In any case, I enjoy the strangeness of this situation, where RPers act very offended when people suggest restrictions, as ridiculous as they are, be placed upon the RP community, but then those same RPers are completely straight faced and serious when they talk about wanting to destroy the Military Gameplay community.

It's as equally a ludicrous and arrogant as suggesting the destruction of the RP community and yet many here seemingly don't see the irony.


See, here's what I find ironic.

You say that you need to have control over UCRs and that those who want to roleplay well tough shit, they can do it in their own little forums. What you fail to realize is that when that happens an entire section of the NS community will fade away because they will get used to their own forums and not get here anymore. Not only that, but once the RP community and their regions disappear you will target other non-gameplay regions and come up with the same excuse and drive them away too, so little by little this game will only be available to you raiders and your shenanigans, and you will have effectively made raiding an exclusive purpose of the site and you won't be happy anymore, you will get bored, and you will be effectively digging your own grave.

In a twisted sense, I can see this as a sort of poetic justice, or karma being a bitch.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:34 am

The Jonathanian States wrote:
Hurdegaryp wrote:Well, what do you think? Better stay away from that place, it is full of methane.


Undoubtedly the moderators will try to smother it, but the season is not on their side. It is summer, after all.

Aye. Maybe finally a summer has come that the NSers can approve of. Maybe finally this is our summer.
Before "This is your second Summer".
Grenartia wrote:
Indeed. It seems to be one trait common to raiders, to never make an argument that isn't half-assed, and to always be condescending whilst doing so.

Also, I'm rather upset at Minnysota's warning for his/her/their WA draft to "Liberate Mallorea and Riva". Apparently, satirical proposals are actionable now. I half want to make a draft myself. Working title is: "Repeal Warn Minnysota".

DO eeeet!Author does not in any way take responsibility for mod reactions against such a thread, but will gladly endorse aforementioned repeal.
Ruridova wrote:Is 'abusing the system is the game' the new 'it's only politics'?

Could be. Flag-switching time?
Evil Wolf wrote:If it passes, then that would seem to suggest the majority didn't oppose it. :P

Or, you know, the majority of NS isn't in the WA.......
Jordslag wrote:I hope those WA delegates don't actually pass this. The majority of NSers oppose this. I hope they listen.

Same.
Registug wrote:I also wish to sign

It's rather inspiring to see all these people I've never met or even seen on the forums before all come here united in their response
...
same here. Though also suddenly seeing many faces flags I've seen all over the forums join up here is nice.
EDIT: Fix'd Registug Quote.


I'd be grateful for any assistance with it.

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
Indeed. It seems to be one trait common to raiders, to never make an argument that isn't half-assed, and to always be condescending whilst doing so.

Also, I'm rather upset at Minnysota's warning for his/her/their WA draft to "Liberate Mallorea and Riva". Apparently, satirical proposals are actionable now. I half want to make a draft myself. Working title is: "Repeal Warn Minnysota".

Questers got a warning for hacking threats, by paraphrasing Mall's line of "doing better with the [region] if it had no password".
I think that's even madder.


Indeed. Somebody should draft that one as well (I'm not quite sure about WA rules about submitting multiple drafts).

Evil Wolf wrote:
Grenartia wrote:Nope. I can almost guarantee you that 95% of the time anybody says "get rid of R/D", they're doing it satirically. Because we know that actually doing so only gives you ammo.


You're joking, right? There are two active threads right now talking about "opting-in" or "opting-out" of raiding with the suggested penalties for violating this "opting" process being Deletion. >_<

But I suppose those threads were all made satirically, so we can just lock them now. :P


Only if you consider opting in/opting out to inherently be "getting rid of R/D" (which you'd have to admit, either implicitly or explicitly, that it is such an awful and shitty game that the only way to get people to play it is to force them, in order to argue that it is inherently "getting rid of" it).
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Horizont
Senator
 
Posts: 3539
Founded: Jun 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Horizont » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:34 am

Evil Wolf wrote:
Grenartia wrote:Nope. I can almost guarantee you that 95% of the time anybody says "get rid of R/D", they're doing it satirically. Because we know that actually doing so only gives you ammo.


You're joking, right? There are two active threads right now talking about "opting-in" or "opting-out" of raiding with the suggested penalties for violating this "opting" process being Deletion. >_<

But I suppose those threads were all made satirically, so we can just lock them now. :P


Seeing as R/Ders don't need to partake in RP, why should RPers be made to partake in R/D?

User avatar
Herrebrugh
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15203
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Herrebrugh » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:35 am

Evil Wolf wrote:
Grenartia wrote:Nope. I can almost guarantee you that 95% of the time anybody says "get rid of R/D", they're doing it satirically. Because we know that actually doing so only gives you ammo.


You're joking, right? There are two active threads right now talking about "opting-in" or "opting-out" of raiding with the suggested penalties for violating this "opting" process being Deletion. >_<

But I suppose those threads were all made satirically, so we can just lock them now. :P


And the argument is that, if the only way your game can exist is through forcing people to play along, then it's shitty to begin with.

Note that all these suggestions only involve stopping people from forcing others to play along with their game, and not banning said game.
Uyt naem Zijner Majeſteyt Jozef III, bij de gratie Godts, Koningh der Herrebrugheylanden, Prins van Rheda, Heer van Jozefslandt, enz. enz. enz.
Im Namen Seiner Majeſtät Joſeph III., von Gottes Gnaden König der Herrenbrückinſeln, Prinz von Rheda, Herr von Josephsland etc. etc. etc.


The Factbook of the Kingdom of the Herrebrugh Islands
Where the Website-Style Factbook Originated!

User avatar
Evil Wolf
Minister
 
Posts: 2407
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Evil Wolf » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:36 am

Horizont wrote:Seeing as R/Ders don't need to partake in RP, why should RPers be made to partake in R/D?



But...there are R/Ders that partake in RP >_<
Last edited by Evil Wolf on Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
It's ok! You can trust me! I've been Commended!

Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.

Mallorea and Riva should be a Game Moderator Game Administrator.

User avatar
Horizont
Senator
 
Posts: 3539
Founded: Jun 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Horizont » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:36 am

Evil Wolf wrote:But...there are R/Ders that partake in RP >_<


Yes, and the point is that they do so voluntarily.
Last edited by Horizont on Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:37 am

Herrebrugh wrote:
Evil Wolf wrote:You're joking, right? There are two active threads right now talking about "opting-in" or "opting-out" of raiding with the suggested penalties for violating this "opting" process being Deletion. >_<

But I suppose those threads were all made satirically, so we can just lock them now. :P

And the argument is that, if the only way your game can exist is through forcing people to play along, then it's shitty to begin with.

Note that all these suggestions only involve stopping people from forcing others to play along with their game, and not banning said game.

Even though many people would be perfectly fine with making the whole raider chucklefuckfest a thing of the past.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
Victoriala
Senator
 
Posts: 4772
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Victoriala » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:38 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Evil Wolf wrote:
RP is a large portion of the site, true, but to suggest that RP is the only portion of the site worth playing and that it makes all the money for the forum is a rather grandiose claim. Just as NS does not revolve around RP, I somehow doubt that all it's profits (which I'm sure aren't much) are entirely from Role Play.

In any case, I enjoy the strangeness of this situation, where RPers act very offended when people suggest restrictions, as ridiculous as they are, be placed upon the RP community, but then those same RPers are completely straight faced and serious when they talk about wanting to destroy the Military Gameplay community.

It's as equally a ludicrous and arrogant as suggesting the destruction of the RP community and yet many here seemingly don't see the irony.


See, here's what I find ironic.

You say that you need to have control over UCRs and that those who want to roleplay well tough shit, they can do it in their own little forums. What you fail to realize is that when that happens an entire section of the NS community will fade away because they will get used to their own forums and not get here anymore. Not only that, but once the RP community and their regions disappear you will target other non-gameplay regions and come up with the same excuse and drive them away too, so little by little this game will only be available to you raiders and your shenanigans, and you will have effectively made raiding an exclusive purpose of the site and you won't be happy anymore, you will get bored, and you will be effectively digging your own grave.

In a twisted sense, I can see this as a sort of poetic justice, or karma being a bitch.

^
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VICTORIALA
Fuck discourse, Memes are the way forward (its inevitable and you know it)
FACTBOOK | LA SOCIÉTÉ | NATIONS | ILLUMINATOR | +
Fucking little island person. 陰 and 陽 but mostly 陰. I draw and do designs.
My NS activity is 90% shitposts. Singy and I fuck each other occasionally.
Equity is True Equality. Pro-Aufklärung, Anti-Gegenaufklärung. [economic: -4.0 social: -4.21]

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:38 am

Horizont wrote:
Evil Wolf wrote:
You're joking, right? There are two active threads right now talking about "opting-in" or "opting-out" of raiding with the suggested penalties for violating this "opting" process being Deletion. >_<

But I suppose those threads were all made satirically, so we can just lock them now. :P


Seeing as R/Ders don't need to partake in RP, why should RPers be made to partake in R/D?


I find it funny (and intellectually dishonest, though I guess that's why the Generalite in me finds it funny) that no raider (or even a mod or admin), to my knowledge, has ever provided an actual answer to that question.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Herrebrugh
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15203
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Herrebrugh » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:38 am

Hurdegaryp wrote:
Herrebrugh wrote:And the argument is that, if the only way your game can exist is through forcing people to play along, then it's shitty to begin with.

Note that all these suggestions only involve stopping people from forcing others to play along with their game, and not banning said game.

Even though many people would be perfectly fine with making the whole raider chucklefuckfest a thing of the past.


I'm not denying that, of course. I'm simply saying that that's not a belief held by all people who oppose being forced to participate in the R/D game.
Uyt naem Zijner Majeſteyt Jozef III, bij de gratie Godts, Koningh der Herrebrugheylanden, Prins van Rheda, Heer van Jozefslandt, enz. enz. enz.
Im Namen Seiner Majeſtät Joſeph III., von Gottes Gnaden König der Herrenbrückinſeln, Prinz von Rheda, Herr von Josephsland etc. etc. etc.


The Factbook of the Kingdom of the Herrebrugh Islands
Where the Website-Style Factbook Originated!

User avatar
Lubyak
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9339
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Lubyak » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:39 am

Evil Wolf wrote:
Hurdegaryp wrote:The significantly reduced traffic on this forum caused by such a poorly thought out policy would at least cripple the income of this forum, since all those unviewed adds will generate no profit at all. There are faster ways to destroy an internet community, but it's a start.


RP is a large portion of the site, true, but to suggest that RP is the only portion of the site worth playing and that it makes all the money for the forum is a rather grandiose claim. Just as NS does not revolve around RP, I somehow doubt that all it's profits (which I'm sure aren't much) are entirely from Role Play.

In any case, I enjoy the strangeness of this situation, where RPers act very offended when people suggest restrictions, as ridiculous as they are, be placed upon the RP community, but then those same RPers are completely straight faced and serious when they talk about wanting to destroy the Military Gameplay community.

It's as equally a ludicrous and arrogant as suggesting the destruction of the RP community and yet many here seemingly don't see the irony.


No one is saying we should destroy R/D, at least not to my knowledge. We're complaining that it is--in essence--legalised bullying and trolling, yes, but not advocating for it to be banned. The closest I've come at least is saying that if the R/D community is so utterly dependent on people being forced into it that it would die if players were allowed to opt out then it should not be worth trying to protect. Surely, if R/D is as popular as people say it is then there would be plenty of players who would opt in to play, no? As before, the RP community is annoyed that we have to bow before the R/D game, and in a way which is designed to FORCE us into playing R/D against our will, combined with the attitude on Mall's part that R/D can 'do more' with a region than RPers can. As before, RPers only want to be left to play our game in peace, but R/D constantly seems to force their way in.

User avatar
Nierr
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1211
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Nierr » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:41 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:Not only that, but once the RP community and their regions disappear you will target other non-gameplay region

You know that most raids aren't of RP regions? To claim that RP regions are bring explicitly targeted for raids above any other kind of foundetless region is silly.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:41 am

Evil Wolf wrote:
Horizont wrote:Seeing as R/Ders don't need to partake in RP, why should RPers be made to partake in R/D?



But...there are R/Ders that partake in RP >_<


They sure as fuck weren't forced to do it.

But that little fact inconveniences you, so you prefer to ignore it, amirite.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Evil Wolf
Minister
 
Posts: 2407
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Evil Wolf » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:44 am

So the argument is the RP are "forced" take part in R/D by matter of being in NS?

Well, duh, its in the FAQ, it's something everyone agrees to every single time they make a new nation. You agreed to be subject to R/D when you clicked "I have read and agree to the NationStates.net Terms & Conditions." when you made your nation. At this point you're just arguing over semantics. You had the opportunity to say "that's something I don't want to be part of" and walk away. You didn't, you're here, it's part of the game and it's not going away.
It's ok! You can trust me! I've been Commended!

Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.

Mallorea and Riva should be a Game Moderator Game Administrator.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:45 am

Evil Wolf wrote:So the argument is the RP are "forced" take part in R/D by matter of being in NS?

Well, duh, its in the FAQ, it's something everyone agrees to every single time they make a new nation. You agreed to be subject to R/D when you clicked "I have read and agree to the NationStates.net Terms & Conditions." when you made your nation. At this point you're just arguing over semantics. You had the opportunity to say "that's something I don't want to be part of" and walk away. You didn't, you're here, it's part of the game and it's not going away.


Dodging the point.

Every other part of the NS experience is totally voluntary. I mean, for fucks sakes, you don't even have to answer the fucking issues, and that's literally what the entire site was intended for.

EDIT: So what the flying fuck makes R/D so goddamned special?
Last edited by Grenartia on Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to International Incidents

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Atmora, European Federal Union, Greater Ordena, Reino do Brazil, Warhaven

Advertisement

Remove ads